There is another 'elephant in the room', which has not been touched upon yet. That is the customers (the OP in this case) responsibility to themselves (if nothing else), to look into whether or not any potential purchase is likely to be reliable long term. In the case of Citroen, they generally do not fare well in reliability or customer satisfaction surveys. This is a well known fact, and supporting information on this is widely and freely available through internet research.
As to Citroen's 'obligation to build vehicles that don't just stop working'?. Not really, their obligation stops when the warranty is up. Car manufacturers want customers to get a new car every 2 or 3 years so it isn't really in their interest to make cars which owners will want to keep long term. As long as folk are willing to plow large amounts of money into getting the latest 'it' car, without giving any consideration to things like long tem reliability, or indeed whether or not the car is actually any good, this will continue to be the case for most makers. Cynical?, yes, but also true!.
I don't have anything against the Picasso, it is one of the few cars which has been properly designed to be a family car, as opposed to something which flatters the drivers ego, and that is only to be applauded. But alas, Citroen don't seem to be able to make cars which last, being to complex for their own good. For this reason, there is no way i'd keep a new Citroen beyond the length of its warranty. If i wanted a car (of that type), to keep long term, it would without a doubt be a Toyota Verso. No, it isn't as well designed as a family car, but it will just keep on working.
Edited by badbusdriver on 11/05/2019 at 12:18
|