What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
Peugeot RCZ 1.THP - Main dealer used car warranty, wear & tear - Patricia Davies

Bought this car from a none Peugeot dealer over the phone 10 months ago.

As the car I wanted ha to be low miles and a certain spec, bought from this dealer who belongs to another Marque, main dealer.

The 1.6THP is used in BMW's as well as Renaults I think and had a reputation for the timing chain to fail.

I noted a slight rattle from the engine about 2 months ago, ie when we had the car 8 months.

I'm the second owner, the car has full Peugeot service history and I had it service through Peugeot a couple of months ago, the 5th service at about 17700 miles.

We have covered about 700 miles on the car when nosie was first noted and now we have done about 850 miles.

We spent 2 months having the car looked at by the dealers/franchise we bought the car from and Peugeot. Clear to Peugeot that it was timing chain as to me without pulling the engine apart. But we had to pay about 130+ pounds to have this done and the dealers representative that we bought the car from to confirm if it was covered by warranty.

They said the fault not covered under warranty as it is "wear and tear."

I feel that as the fault became apparent when we'd had the car for just under 8 months and had covered only 700 miles that the dealer we bought the car from should cover the cost in full or at the very least in part.

To spend 900+ pounds (check fee and repair) to replace the timing chain and tensioner on a low mileage car that had been fully maintained by the main dealer, it does not feel right. IMO, either the warranty is not fit for the purpose or the car.

We rang the dealer we bought the car from and they will relay my concerns to higher management but felt it was a now win for me as "wear and tear had been noted." and suggested we tried Peugeot customer services.

I bought the car over the phone as it was the main dealer with a good reputation and the car was low mileage and full service history from a main dealer but never expected to throw away 900 pounds having barely covered 700 miles in the car over 8 months or so.

Two months of waiting, going to one showroom to another, about 20 phone calls and many emails I get lumbered with this

Thank you. Patricia.

Edited by Patricia Davies on 07/09/2018 at 01:54

Peugeot RCZ 1.THP - Main dealer used car warranty, wear & tear - Gibbo_Wirral

To spend 900+ pounds (check fee and repair) to replace the timing chain and tensioner on a low mileage car that had been fully maintained by the main dealer, it does not feel right. IMO, either the warranty is not fit for the purpose or the car.

You're absolutely right. Small claims court.

Edited by Gibbo_Wirral on 07/09/2018 at 13:18

Peugeot RCZ 1.THP - Main dealer used car warranty, wear & tear - RobJP

To spend 900+ pounds (check fee and repair) to replace the timing chain and tensioner on a low mileage car that had been fully maintained by the main dealer, it does not feel right. IMO, either the warranty is not fit for the purpose or the car.

You're absolutely right. Small claims court.

I tend to disagree. The car is out of warranty, and the Consumer Rights Act protection only applies for 6 months after purchase.

Even though the car is only low mileage, it's obviously a few years old, as it's now had 5 services.

You don't say exactly what 'warranty' the car was sold with. But bear in mind that the retailer's obligations to you last for 6 months - anything within that timespan, any problems are assumed to have been 'present or developing' at the time of sale, and it is up to the retailer to prove otherwise.

After that 6 months, it is up to YOU to prove that the problem WAS 'present or developing' at the time of sale - an independent engineer's report, basically.

Whether it 'feels right' or not is irrelevant.

Peugeot RCZ 1.THP - Main dealer used car warranty, wear & tear - SLO76
“They said the fault not covered under warranty as it is "wear and tear."


They’re trying to fob you off. Timing chain failure at this mileage is certainly not wear and tear, it is a warranty issue and should be covered. Press the dealer and warranty firm and make clear that you will persue them through legal channels if they don’t act. It’s normal for warranty firms to try wriggling out of claims but they usually will back down if you stand your ground. I am assuming from your post that it is a low mileage car with full dealer history?

As for the warranty being up as another poster mentions well as long as the issue was reported before the policy was up then they are obligated to fix it. I know it’s too late to say but this engine is not a good design, I wouldn’t recommend it to anyone.

Peugeot RCZ 1.THP - Main dealer used car warranty, wear & tear - Patricia Davies

Thank you all.

The warranty we got with the car is for 12 months, a Toyota, warranty for 'approves used cars.' Therefore, the car was at the point of the claim and still is under warranty.

Peugeot RCZ 1.THP - Main dealer used car warranty, wear & tear - galileo
“They said the fault not covered under warranty as it is "wear and tear." They’re trying to fob you off. Timing chain failure at this mileage is certainly not wear and tear, it is a warranty issue and should be covered. Press the dealer and warranty firm and make clear that you will persue them through legal channels if they don’t act. It’s normal for warranty firms to try wriggling out of claims but they usually will back down if you stand your ground. I am assuming from your post that it is a low mileage car with full dealer history? As for the warranty being up as another poster mentions well as long as the issue was reported before the policy was up then they are obligated to fix it. I know it’s too late to say but this engine is not a good design, I wouldn’t recommend it to anyone.

The OP has only done about 700 miles in 8 months - the engine may never have fully warmed up, which is hardly ideal usage.