I wouldn't be surprised if the sale advert actually said 'one PREVIOUS owner' - which can legally mean one owner PRIOR to the one currently on the logbook - so it's had 2 owners.
If that's the case, then you haven't got a leg to stand on with that side of things. Even if you did, for a 6 year old vehicle it would amount to buttons - £100 or so - for having 2 prior keepers rather than one.
By the reading of the respondent's letter, they're stating that you've left it rather 'woolly', which is meant by 'insufficiently particularised', 'no reasonable course of action against the defendant', and 'stylised particulars'. In other words, cut the flowery rhetoric, and stick to plain facts Some thing like :
That the defendant did provide a vehicle that was not fit for purpose, that the defendant is liable for the cost incurred in repairing that vehicle to make it fit for purpose, and that the sum involved is £XXX.
The warranty company is irrelevant - the selling garage is entirely liable for failures within the first six months.
|