What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Dingle232

My mileage has recently increased (well, in the last 6 months) to over 20k per year with most of them being weekly runs to the Lakes; a weekly journey of just over 200 miles round trip. In addition I have normal commute etc mileage during the week plus some other longer motorway runs twice weekly.

I currently run a Toyota RAV4 2.2 D-CAT Auto which I love in every other respect than the running costs.

Even keeping things steady it's returning a recorded average of around 32mpg so real life is much worse. My monthy dlesel cost is over £200 which for me is unsuatainable. Add to that road tax and you get the picture.

Ideally I am looking to buy a similar or big enough vehicle that is more economical and wondered if anyone had a view. Criteria are:

  • Must be diesel and no more than 2 - 2.5 years old. My RAV is a 2014 plate.
  • Must be Auto.
  • Budget to £17500 (this would enable me to potentially swap the RAV4 like for like so as not incurring extra cost and therefore impacting potential savings).
  • Must also have a boot space big enough to swallow 2 x mountain bikes when required plus luggage.

I have had an initial look at:

1 - Nissan Qashqai - seems reasonably spec'd but not driven one.


2 - Kia Carens - I really liked this but the 'Real MPG' on HJ suggests I won't be too much better off, if at all.


3 - Skoda Octavia 2.0 - however I have concerns about the DSG and I prefer the higher riding position of the SUV types but the boot size is amazing.

Any other ideas? Intention is to keep the car 3 - 5 years.

Thank you on advance for the help.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Falkirk Bairn

Is the Lake District Private Mileage or Company mileage?

A DiL does short business journeys in her car for business BUT Long Journeys Hires a car through Company Scheme - saves mileage on her car & day rate is a negotiated rate with no silly 100 mile maximum per day.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Dingle232

It's all private mileage - I don't do very much business mileage at all. That's part of the issue - spending time at the petrol station is becoming a hobby :-).

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - SLO76
I Doubt any large diesel automatic within your budget will achieve a meaningful saving regarding fuel consumption. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV is able to average around 65mpg apparently depending on usage, massively short of the manufacturers claims but still it is a large auto SUV with Japanese levels of reliability and there's no turbo, DMF or DPF to worry about plus free road tax.

If you can put up with changing gears for yourself the Honda CRV 1.6 DTEC is very economical. Ours is averaging 56mpg with 65 possible on longer runs and road tax is only £20. But the auto is only an option on the much pricier and heavier 4wd 2.2 or 1.6 twin turbo diesels neither of which will be much if any more economical than your current car.

Agree with avoiding VAG's DSG box, there are too many expensive tales of woe on the net regarding them.
SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Dingle232
I Doubt any large diesel automatic within your budget will achieve a meaningful saving regarding fuel consumption. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV is able to average around 65mpg apparently depending on usage, massively short of the manufacturers claims but still it is a large auto SUV with Japanese levels of reliability and there's no turbo, DMF or DPF to worry about plus free road tax. If you can put up with changing gears for yourself the Honda CRV 1.6 DTEC is very economical. Ours is averaging 56mpg with 65 possible on longer runs and road tax is only £20. But the auto is only an option on the much pricier and heavier 4wd 2.2 or 1.6 twin turbo diesels neither of which will be much if any more economical than your current car. Agree with avoiding VAG's DSG box, there are too many expensive tales of woe on the net regarding them.

Thanks for that it's helpful.

I did look at the PHEV but am mindful of the reviews that slate it's economy over longer distances. As most of my mileage is motorway thay that's quite offputting.

Looking at the real mpg figures then the Qashqai appears to offer around 43 mpg. I accept that isn't outstanding in its own right but it's probably around 10-12 mpg more than I'm getting right now. Over 20k miles that's a saving.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - SLO76
I like the look of the Qashqai but the fact that it is basically a Renault Megane underneath puts me off. I know Renault's 1.5 dci is tried and tested and will do 150k easy enough if looked after but the newer 1.6 is still unproven and I'm not sure what autobox they use but Renault don't have a great reputation in this area either. Don't buy one thinking you're buying Japanese reliability, it's a Renault with a Nissan badge.

As for the saving you'll get, it's small change compared to the cost to buy a newer car and the higher depreciation you'd suffer on it. I'd also have more confidence in your Toyota than a newer Renault, sorry Nissan Qashqai.

Edited by SLO76 on 21/11/2016 at 19:33

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - SLO76
I do like the lazy drive of an automatic gearbox but one thing I've found when shopping for a similar motor last time was that the majority of SUV manufacturers only offered an autobox on higher spec models usually with 4wd. We'd probably have ticked that option had Honda offered it on the 1.6 2wd CRV but the only option was the much thirstier 2.2 4wd at the time which is nearly 20mpg down on our car.

Large, high riding and heavy family SUV's particularly one lugging around a heavy 4wd drivetrain and driving through a power sapping autobox is never going to be great on fuel.



SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Avant

That seems very bad for a diesel. I had two petrol Octavias that did better than that. The DSG did about 38 mpg on a long run like that, the manual over 40.

My current Volvo V60 (torque-converter auto) will do about 50 mpg on a long run, so try an XC60 D3 or D4 which should give you 45 or so. Or even a V70 estate if it's a better shape for your bikes. The Qashqai sounds like a good idea too.

Edit: Thinking about it, does SLO76 or any other expert have any views as to why cars like the RAV-4 are so thirsty? Is it the 4WD or the poorer aerodynamics compared with an estate?

Edited by Avant on 21/11/2016 at 18:45

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Dingle232

It is Avant. I have driven diesels for many years and the previous worst I had was a V40 D3 which had the 5 pot engine and even that wasn't as bad as this.

Economy aside the RAV is a fabulous car even if I am an unashamed Toyota fan. It's practical, not at all bad to drive and, of course, as reliable as toast.

The tax is over £200/year though and when coupled with very very poor economy it makes it borderline unsustainable to run. The trick is to find something that doesn't cost me anything to change so I am netting any savings from Day One.

I may have to consider an estate as it does appear that the SUV/MPG types are inherently thirsty.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - RT

4wd, automatic transmission, high ground clearance and upright seating position all conspire against fuel economy, that goes for any SUV and most CUVs - you may have to accept the height penalty to carry your loads but stick with conventional estates if you can.

32mpg from a RAV-4 is poor, I was getting 33 from a Hyundai Santa Fe 7-seater and get 30 from my current 3.0 VW Touareg, both automatics.

Edited by RT on 21/11/2016 at 19:32

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Dingle232

RT - makes total sense and very much what I was thinking myself. Just one point though: the 32 mpg is as reported by the car's computer. I haven't actually done a brim to brim comparison but I think it's reasonable to assume that the the real MPG is likely to be even worse.

You can imagine it's proving somewhat costly......

I may have to look at the larger estates so would anyone recommend any in particular? Instinctively I'd tend to go for an Avensis estate but fear the Toyota diesel, again paired with their auto box, may be comparitively expensive.

Never was a Ford fan but Mondeo estate would obviously be a contender even if I'd be less confident about them doing 100k + miles. May also look to see if I can pick up a 3 year old E Class as long as it's been looked after.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Avant

Another thought - VW Group diesels are good on both performance and economy. You have less to fear from the wet-clutch (usually 6-speed) DSG that's found in the 2.0 TDI Skoda Octavia, Superb and Yeti, also in sundry VWs, SEATs and Audis. It should give you 50+ mpg on a good long run.

This transmission is much less troublesome than the dry-clutch type in smaller VW Group models, so it's worth thinking about a Skoda, which will be cheaper for the same age of car than a VW or Audi.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Dingle232

Thanks Avant I wasn't aware of that as have just been massively put off by all mention of DSG. You really would have thought that VW would have remedied these by now.

I'll look at those.

I have also been looking at a few this evening and the 308 SW looks to have a cavernous boot size - I'd never considered those before either.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Falkirk Bairn

Watch out!

Replacing Reliable Toyota RAV4 for another make & model might save money in the forecourt

To be replaced with LUMPS of money spent in the garage on repairs.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Dingle232

Yes that is a concern but I am sure that there are cars from the likes of Kia/Hyundai and other mainstream makers these days that can't be all that bad surely?

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - SLO76
Before considering an automatic Peugeot take a moment to check the used values of similar older examples. You'll lose a crippling amount in depreciation, it'll be worth £6.50 when you come to sell. Whereas there will always be a steady supply of willing punters for your Toyota. It would be a false economy.

I also doubt that you'd save money by swapping to a large automatic prestige estate like the E Class which will struggle to hit 40mpg and will cost substantially more for parts and servicing. Though I can see the appeal of the Volvo V60 with Volvo's own Diesel engines rather than the older and notoriously fragile PSA 1.6 diesel and I'm a fan of the Skoda Superb. If the DSG box is ok as Avant says it would be a good bet. They certainly stand up well to taxi use in manual spec.

But I'd advise against spending thousand of pounds buying another car based on fuel consumption alone, it's only one factor in overall running costs and you may just be saving a few hundred quid a year on fuel but end up losing more to higher depreciation and servicing costs.

Have you considered a second cheap car as a runabout to reduce the mileage you do in the larger car? We run a VW Polo 1.2 TDi as well as the CRV and by my calculations it should pay for itself by keeping mileage off the more valuable car. 60mpg local economy and £20 road tax help too. It's handy having a second car as a backup.

Edited by SLO76 on 21/11/2016 at 22:26

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Dingle232

Thanks SLO76 I appreciate your view and share some of your concerns. Just to be completely clear I am actually not talking about spending anything but instead working within the current valuation of the Toyota and no more. That's the only way to take advantage of what may only be small savings but savings nonetheless.

I've looked quite a lot this evening. The 308 is a consideration but I have now also considered the depreciation and you are correct - the hit I would take is greater than the cumulative expense on the Rav so that's a no brainer.

On reflection I may be better placed to look at brands with higher residuals (VW/Skoda) so I'd instead look at those. However I can't ignore the warranty merits of Kia and Hyundai if they prove to be financially viable and cost less to run. Cars like the i40 are hard to ignore from that point of view but, again, I don't know what their residuals are like.

I'd love a V60 but that woukd incur expense over and above the Rav4.

Oh - I'd love a second car. But I have SWMBO to get past. :-)

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - SLO76
I take it it's your intention to sell the RAV 4 privately? Otherwise a deal to swap for another car of the same value will see you worse off.

You'll be offered minimum trade in values against cars of the same value or less and many dealers may unjustly assume your car has an issue if you just want to swap out of it. Have you approached any dealers to have your car valued?

The steering committee at my residence is thankfully a fellow petrol head and she's pretty relaxed at my propensity to fill the driveway with four wheeled junk. I'm down to just three at the moment after selling my old V6 Ford Cougar for a profit after 6mths use. I love cheap older cars and have run a long line of them over the years for buttons ever since losing a fortune on a nearly new BMW. It's a great feeling to beat the system.
SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Dingle232

I think I like you :-).

To be honest I think I'll struggle to sell it privately as I have done with cars at a similar price point in the past. If you consider that most cars today are financed or PCP'd then in my experience there aren't a lot of people willing to pay £17k cash without the backup of the dealer experience.

A valuation of mine has been respected by the couple of dealers I have spoken to thus far but, again, I take your point that the car I'd be buying for the 'same' would of course have dealer profit embedded into the price and in reality be worth less.

Can't win really.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - SLO76
Thanks..

I agree you'd struggle, I always have with anything beyond around £3-£4k but you never know. It's not that common to find a diesel auto RAV4. Price it right and it might go but then if there's no backup car you're stranded I suppose. If you were near by I could lend you the Mazda 3 I use for work. It cost me nothing, a freebie for helping an old punter save over £1k on a used car.

I'd keep it and go buy a wee cheap runabout for £1,000-£2,000. It'll pay for itself by keeping the miles off the Toyota and it's less than you'll lose part exchanging. It'll protect the DPF in the RAV4 too as you can use it for local running. Go sell the idea to the other half.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Dingle232

Nice idea but the second car idea just won't fly at home I am afraid. Having slept on it I need to consider some more really before jumping in. I either need to stick with the RAV and pay the bills whilst enjoying th eversatility it gives me

or

go for something like a V40 or Auris that I can stick a bike carrying town bar and roofbox on for when I need it. That would give me the best of both worlds I guess.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - jc2

If most of your driving is motorways/long distance,why do you prefer auto?

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - SteVee

Do you carry anything on the outside of the RAV4 ?
Bikes / spare wheel etc ?
Is there anything you could do make the car more effecient on your long journeys ? Are your tyre pressures correct ?
Could you possibly do fewer journeys to the lakes ? - just one less per month should ease the cost.
I think you would regret getting rid of a reliable Toyota for an older, possibly much less reliable car on the basis that you MIGHT get better fuel consumption.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Dingle232

Do you carry anything on the outside of the RAV4 ?
Bikes / spare wheel etc ?
Is there anything you could do make the car more effecient on your long journeys ? Are your tyre pressures correct ?
Could you possibly do fewer journeys to the lakes ? - just one less per month should ease the cost.
I think you would regret getting rid of a reliable Toyota for an older, possibly much less reliable car on the basis that you MIGHT get better fuel consumption.

No that's the baffling thing - more often than not it's only me in the car and even at a steady 65 mph the clock is still showing a max of 34mpg. Tyre pressures are absolutely bob on so nothing you can immediately point to.

Even if I take me as a variable out of it and set the cruise it's the same result.

I am very reluctant to let it go on the basis of reliability I really am. But I can't ignore that running costs are, for me, unsustainable. Inexplicably so.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Palcouk

If 20k/year and auto there is nothing in your budget that would offer any significan saviing on running costs (Real mpg & maintenance)

Any px of your existing Rav would swallow any future saveings in the depreciation hit - in other words you would be cutting off your nose to spite your face.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Dingle232

If 20k/year and auto there is nothing in your budget that would offer any significan saviing on running costs (Real mpg & maintenance)

Any px of your existing Rav would swallow any future saveings in the depreciation hit - in other words you would be cutting off your nose to spite your face.

Ignoring (for a minute) the small loss I would take over what I paid for it how is this so? If I pay nothing to change for a more economical vehicle then surely savings are savings?

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - SLO76
You would receive a car that's worth at least £1,500-£2,000 less than the one you currently own. From the type of alternatives you're suggesting (large executive diesel SUV's and estates) you won't save much more than 5mpg. How many years would it take to make up this loss in value?

You'll also be introducing the risk of higher maintenance and reduced dependability into the mix on what will be an older, higher mileage motor and considering how desirable your Toyota is you'll also likely suffer higher depreciation which will on its own eliminate any fuel saving.

If you want to save money then you need to sell the car and downsize to a manual diesel powered car that's carrying less weight and has better aerodynamics, otherwise the reduction in fuel consumption will be marginal.

You can't get something for nothing. If you want a large comfortable estate or SUV with an autobox then you'll have to accept the running costs that come with it or downsize.

Swapping with a dealer will leave you worse off by a substantial margin. As a salesman I've done deals like this and the customer has never landed well. Unless you're putting money in and upgrading you get the worst trade in value.

Sorry to be all doom and gloom by the way, just trying to save you from what would likely be a regrettable mistake.

Edited by SLO76 on 22/11/2016 at 12:45

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Dabooka

Your situation is almost identical to that of my wife's two years ago, with 20k / annum and a Rav 2.2 which we loved but mpg was poor and it was getting a bit leggy.

We opted for a pre reg Pug 2008 although it's the manual and it is smaller the Rav, but you should get bikes etc in (no rear passenegers obviously!). Shop around and you'll have change a plenty form your budget.

Cheap as hell to run (she gets ~60mpg on a good journey, and insurance and VED are a pittance compared to the Rav), comfortable, well spec'd and more than adequate for our needs. Might be worth going for a test drive to at least rule it out?

Otherwise you're looking at an estate of some sort to hit those MPG returns

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Dingle232

Your situation is almost identical to that of my wife's two years ago, with 20k / annum and a Rav 2.2 which we loved but mpg was poor and it was getting a bit leggy.

We opted for a pre reg Pug 2008 although it's the manual and it is smaller the Rav, but you should get bikes etc in (no rear passenegers obviously!). Shop around and you'll have change a plenty form your budget.

Cheap as hell to run (she gets ~60mpg on a good journey, and insurance and VED are a pittance compared to the Rav), comfortable, well spec'd and more than adequate for our needs. Might be worth going for a test drive to at least rule it out?

Otherwise you're looking at an estate of some sort to hit those MPG returns

Thanks and that is an option. I think SLO76 is on the button though that in round terms I am going to lose out by doing that and then take another potential hit in terms of depreciation when I come to sell it.

It's certainly an option if I am prepared to accept that though, the more i think about it, the more I consider that it may be worth my 'investing' a few quid to buy something of parity and then keep hold of it. Probably the most likely option would be a V40 D4 which should be reliable, have reasonable residuals and certainly be more economical though I'm not deluding myself in any way by pretending it will be big enough to pay for the outlay.

The benefit to me will just be, moth on month, savings in terms of fuel and annualyy tax and insurance.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - bazza

It's very difficult to change the car and end up saving money in my experience. I've tried it too and once you factor in the dealer profit margins, I think the only way is to sell your car somehow for its market value and downsize into something older, more economical and shrewdly purchased. Even then it's a lottery. Anything older might hit you with an unexpected bill and wipe any potential savings out.

I calculate you are spending about £280 monthly and even buying something doing 45 mpg will only save you about £80 a month on diesel. I doubt you;ll find a big auto SUV that can average that to be honest.

I would keep what you've got, drive it until the change point you originally anticipated and look for a large estate or hatch, or MPV. I'd avoid SUV and 4wd unless you really have a need for it, otherwise it's just wasting fuel.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Falkirk Bairn

If it costs say £3,000 to change a good reliable car for a "new one" i.e. new or 2nd hand.

If you get 30 mpg and the new car gets 40mpg the cost of petrol/diesel goes down.

20K @ 40MPG = 500Gallons - 2,250 litres

20K @ 30MPG = 666 Gallons - 3,016 litres

Savings = 166 gallons @ £5.00 per gallon = £830

i.e you will be into 3.5 years before you save the £3,000 cost of change.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Avant

It does look as if you won't save much by changing. Before you give up on the Toyota, maybe try a little experiment.

Fill the car up at the start of a trip to the Lake District. Then - if you can bear it - keep your maximum speed down to 60 mph, and see if you can avoid using the kickdown which is particularly tempting on diesel automatics in order to make good progress.

At the end of the trip fill up again, even though you may not need to, just to see what the consumption is before you do any short journeys.

I hope that helps. If it does, let us know how you get on.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Dingle232

Thanks Avant. I agree, and the posters on the thread have been very helpful, in helping me determine that I will encounter similar issues should I simply move to another SUV.

The experiment you mention is very apt as I actually did just that some weeks ago in setting the cruise to 60 and letting that do the work. It was a frustrating journey!

At the end of it I can tell you that the actual mpg I got was 34 - that's on a motorway!

My thinking at the moment, as others have said, is that I either have to pay the price at the pumps of owning an SUV Auto or I have to change my thinking. I am actually minded to downsize, as I mentioned in an earlier post, to a medium sized hatch, and then simply accepting that the car will be a long termer.

The unknown of course is reliability and that's my biggest concern. As a previous Volvo owner I am swayed towards a V40 despite the interior being rather small but am also tempted by the Mazda 3 and 308. I accept that I will be taking a hit at point of change over what I paid for the RAV but at least I will not be paying out any more at this point and then, hopefully, the monthly fuel bills will at least be somewhat less. That doesn't make it a great deal but rather just a case of cutting losses.

Depreciation of course is something I'll have to live with later in the day.

Will sleep on it and decide tomorrow. I am not in a mad panic.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - SLO76
Downsizing is your only option if you need to save money week to week and don't want to run a second cheap car but I'd avoid anything that has PSA's notorious 1.6 diesel under the hood, it has a terrible reputation for turbo failure. Look up several threads on here regarding it. I've encountered more than a few myself. This includes the 308 and some variants of the Volvo V40 along with the Ford Focus and the Mazda 3. Are you still wanting to stick with an automatic gearbox or are you willing to change your own gears? It'll severely limit your options if you want a diesel auto in this class.
SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Dingle232
Downsizing is your only option if you need to save money week to week and don't want to run a second cheap car but I'd avoid anything that has PSA's notorious 1.6 diesel under the hood, it has a terrible reputation for turbo failure. Look up several threads on here regarding it. I've encountered more than a few myself. This includes the 308 and some variants of the Volvo V40 along with the Ford Focus and the Mazda 3. Are you still wanting to stick with an automatic gearbox or are you willing to change your own gears? It'll severely limit your options if you want a diesel auto in this class.

Yeah I think downsizing is the way forward if I elect to change. Thanks for the heads up about the engines. The ones I've looked are: V40 D4 so the new engine. 308 2.0 HDi Mazda 3 2.2 Skyactiv and yes I will still need an auto I'm afraid. They all look nice cars and are capable of towbar and roofbox if I need them so a good option. The 308 is the cheapest and would actually involve my receiving around £5k back over the trade in value of the RAV I am torn with this as cash wise it's the most tempting but, as you said earlier, I am not sure what it would be worth in another 2 years. The V40 is a 16 plate and the others late 2015. Ironically I was very tempted by a hybrid Auris but there's conflicting advice as to whether I could use a towbar at all with a Hybrid. That probably would have been my first choice.
SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - SLO76
I like the current Mazda 3 but I've read some reports of issues with Mazda's 2.2 diesels on a thread here recently that I wasn't aware of. The V40 is a nice thing and Volvo's own diesels do have a great record for durability plus residuals would be strong and comfort high. As for down trading to the 308, you can expect an automatic Pug 308 to be worthless by its 5th birthday. Plus have you tried a dealer to see what you'd be offered in a down trade? I think you'll be surprised at how much less than trade value you'll get for your own car in such a deal. It's a kind of unwritten rule that a downtrade or swap style deal will see your trade in heavily marked down unless it's against a motor they're desperate to sell. I'd spend a bit to save a lot and upgrade to a nice auto V40. Avant says the same car is good for 50mpg plus it'll be easier to sell on with an autobox than the Pug or the Mazda.

Edited by SLO76 on 23/11/2016 at 09:49

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - SLO76
I realise you're probably fed up with us all questioning your economy figures but I can't understand why you're only getting 34mpg on a run at 60mph. I've bettered that in a Shogun 2.8 diesel auto with a light right foot and it they were greedy old things. Even the automatic petrol Saab 9-5 2.3 turbo estate my partners aunt used to run could better that when we borrowed it.

The reasons why full automatics are generally thirstier than the manual version are down to the power sapping torque converter plus autos tend to be lower geared than manual equivalents so you'll find that the engine is spinning at higher revs constantly but I'd still expect your big motor to hit 40mpg in such conditions.

I'd get your tracking checked, if it's out by much it's like driving through sand and will hurt economy as much as incorrect tyre pressures will. There's certainly something amiss.
SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Dingle232
I realise you're probably fed up with us all questioning your economy figures but I can't understand why you're only getting 34mpg on a run at 60mph. I've bettered that in a Shogun 2.8 diesel auto with a light right foot and it they were greedy old things. Even the automatic petrol Saab 9-5 2.3 turbo estate my partners aunt used to run could better that when we borrowed it. The reasons why full automatics are generally thirstier than the manual version are down to the power sapping torque converter plus autos tend to be lower geared than manual equivalents so you'll find that the engine is spinning at higher revs constantly but I'd still expect your big motor to hit 40mpg in such conditions. I'd get your tracking checked, if it's out by much it's like driving through sand and will hurt economy as much as incorrect tyre pressures will. There's certainly something amiss.

No no I am very appreciative of the help and insights. Sometimes there are things you don't think of yourself when you are so immersed in the subject so thanks for taking the time.

I don't understand it either. I bought the car in full knowledge that it would be slightly more expensive to run but not this expensive. On Monday I filled it up and after a 35 mile trip to Manchester and back plus a run to work and home yesterday it's almost half full! You get the picture.

I have seen a nice V40 that will cost me around £900 to get into. It's a 2016 too and looks very nice so am tempted to go down that road.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - SLO76
That figure of £900, is that based on the dealers offer on your own car? If you want to post a link for the advert sometimes us car know it all types can spot issues from it.
SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Dingle232

Yes it is and please excuse me not wanting to post the link but I've been burned before by somebody jumping in before me :-).

It's nice though, V40 R Design D4 on a 2016 plate, 10k miles, FSH. I have actually done a CAP valuation for mine and their offer is actually slightly above that.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - madf

According to HJ's real MPG figs, you should achieve c 40mpg..

There is soemthing seriously wrong.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Ian_SW

If you're planning to keep the car a reasonably long time with high mileage and buying at 2-3 years old, you can use quick depreciating cars to your advantage.

Consider cars where the model is just about to be or has just been replaced or facelifted, which instantly knocks a large chunk of their value. It doesn't need to be a rubbish car, just one which the market considers 'out of date'. Examples could be at the top end of your budget a BMW 5 series, somewhere in the middle an old model Mondeo, or at the bottom end a Vauxhall Astra (which you would have enough money left over to buy a spare one with 2 year old cars selling for about £8k!!)

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - RT
I realise you're probably fed up with us all questioning your economy figures but I can't understand why you're only getting 34mpg on a run at 60mph. I've bettered that in a Shogun 2.8 diesel auto with a light right foot and it they were greedy old things. Even the automatic petrol Saab 9-5 2.3 turbo estate my partners aunt used to run could better that when we borrowed it. The reasons why full automatics are generally thirstier than the manual version are down to the power sapping torque converter plus autos tend to be lower geared than manual equivalents so you'll find that the engine is spinning at higher revs constantly but I'd still expect your big motor to hit 40mpg in such conditions. I'd get your tracking checked, if it's out by much it's like driving through sand and will hurt economy as much as incorrect tyre pressures will. There's certainly something amiss.

All the TC automatics I've had in the last 20+ years have had torque-converter "lock-up" for use when cruising, eliminating the TC inefficiency at least then as it's still there during acceleration or hard driving.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - SLO76
"All the TC automatics I've had in the last 20+ years have had torque-converter "lock-up" for use when cruising, eliminating the TC inefficiency at least then as it's still there during acceleration or hard driving."

True but as you say it's still affecting it during acceleration plus the final gearing is almost always lower than the equivalent manual. Though the latest 7&8 speed boxes and CVT's might well be a match. Shouldn't be crippling the figures as much as it is in this case though.
SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - MGspannerman

I too have a Rav4 2.2D auto. Mine is 63 reg with currently 51k on the clock, all but 10k down to me. I did a 230 mile round trip yesterday together with 40 odd miles this morning. i always fill brim to brim and zero the trip meter and I obtained 39.63 mpg. This is as accurate as I can get and consistent with previous calculations. I travel on the motorwy at 70-75 and drive fairly briskly so this is not due to nun-like behaviour. Can i suggest that first and foremost you check the true mpg? After all this is akey driver in your decision to consider swapping. i dont even bother to look at the computer on mine as I have always used the tripmeter and fill-to-full method as a way of gauging mpg and general car health.

Previously I had a D5 V60, lovely car but considserably smaller and much less room for passengers and luggage. it averaged 42 mpg in similar driving circusmtances but the last service I had done cost over £350 at my local dealer, albeit at 16k rather than 10k miles. The Rav4 cost at most £240, and last time at 50k was only £180. The Rav4 with £51k miles and in 37 months has had 4 new tyres, and front discs and pads. For the size fo vehicle I think this is pretty mucxh as good as it gets as I do value the reliability factor. The 5th Toyota we have owned and as good as the others.

What would i replace it with, bearing in mind that ligament damage dictates an auto? I really have no idea but maybe a new version 308SW after the initial chunk of depreciation has been lost. Possibly the new Kia Sportage but they are still very expensive. Actually for the distances involved the Rav4 overall looks to be a reasonably economical bet for my 18k a year or so. I will be itnerested to see the outcome as I too spend over £200 a month on diesel.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - sandy56

Have a look at the Peugeot 508SW- and the 2l HDI diesel Auto- a rather good comfy estate car, or the 3008 with same engine, and within your price range. They also do a hybrid version.

Edited by sandy56 on 24/11/2016 at 12:07

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Dingle232

Just to close out the story as many of you were kind enough to reply. I looked at, and drove, a number of options over the last couple of days and have bought a 16 plate Volvo V40 D4SE Lux Nav. I'm delighted with it as it's 6 months old and I managed to get the deal for just £750 over the trade in of the RAV4. I actually got more for the RAV4 than the CAP or Glass' valuation.

It's a little smaller inside than some of the other options but, as per your advice, I concluded that downsizing and 'investing' a little was indeed a better option than like for like swap. I've managed to bag a nice car that's newer, far more economical and, hopefully, will serve me well with decent enough residuals.

Oh, and it goes like the clappers :-)

Thanks for all the help.

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - SLO76
Excellent
SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - RT

Thanks for the update, it's always nice to hear the end of the story/saga however it plays out.

So now go and enjoy!

SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - SLO76
Good choice, nice car, one I'd buy myself so keep us informed on how things go, especially economy wise.
SUV/MPV - Most economic option? - Dingle232

I will do. Today is only day 1 but with the same driving, and on the same regular run as the RAV4, the V40 computer is showing 48.9 mpg.

Even allowing for the error in both cars' calculations that's a massive difference. I think the only person disappointed I have changed cars is the bloke in the local Shell petrol station :-)