What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
Shell V-Power Nitro+ vs Millers Ecomax diesel additive
If my understanding is correct, Shell V-Power Nitro+ and Millers Ecomax fuel additive (when added to regular Shell diesel) both claim to achieve the same objective.
However, Millers Ecomax additive works out at an additional £1 per 50 litres, whereas the V-Power is an additional £4 per 50 litres. Is using V-Power instead of the Millers Ecomax additive really worth the additional £3, and if so, how is this justified?
However, Millers Ecomax additive works out at an additional £1 per 50 litres, whereas the V-Power is an additional £4 per 50 litres. Is using V-Power instead of the Millers Ecomax additive really worth the additional £3, and if so, how is this justified?
Asked on 1 September 2014 by Russ
Answered by
Honest John
I have lots of evidence to support the use of Shell V-Power Nitro+ petrol and diesel, but, though I trust Millers products, I have nothing to support the long term use of Millers Ecomax instead, so I can't tell you.
Real MPG enables you to register the fuel economy you are actually getting against your make and model of car, its engine and type of transmission.
Every time you enter an average consumption figure against your car, the overall average automatically adjusts to reflect it.
Similar questions
I have noticed a considerable difference in mpg when using some supermarket fuels compared to Shell V-power. Is this due to supermarkets buying low grade fuel to keep their costs low ? What is exactly...
Following your advice, I filled up with Super Unleaded and was slightly disappointed to find I only got an extra 20 miles out of my 40-litre tank. I have filled up a second time, this time with Shell V-Power,...
What is the best petrol for economy and performance for my Audi Q3 2.0 TFSI Quattro? Is it Shell, BP, Texaco or Esso? Should I buy a "super" petrol e.g. Shell V-Power or other suppliers equivalents?
Elsewhere on 
.jpg)
