Should I have been told that my Honda Jazz was originally a hire car?
I recently bought a Honda Jazz, twelve months old with 12,700 miles, from a reputable Honda dealer. I was told by the salesman that the car had one previous owner. It was not until I received the new registration certificate from the DVLA that I discovered the previous owner had been a car hire company. Does this constitute the dealership and the salesman being sparing with the truth?
Asked on 21 December 2013 by IK, Liverpool

No. If you buy a used car that is 3 - 18 months old then there is a 90 per cent probability that the first keeper of the car was a car rental company.
Tags:
hire cars
buying a used car
Similar questions

I bought a six month old Volvo XC60 from my local Volvo dealer in Sunderland on the understanding that it was an ex Volvo UK management car. Two weeks later when I received the V5C in the post I noticed...

We have an apartment in Mallorca, Spain and currently rent cars. This works well, as we have found a decent private operator, but are looking for a slightly better standard of car as we increase our use...

On 23 November, I bought a 61-plate (registered Feb 2012) Volkswagen Golf 1.2 TSI 85 S five-door for £9629 from a dealer. The salesman told my wife and I that the car was previously registered to Volkswagen,...
Related models
.jpg?width=115&height=75&rmode=crop)
Neatly styled. Increased room and better performance than original Jazz. better to drive. Very versatile. CVT-7 returned in February 2011 replacing i-SHIFT. More reliable than first generation Jazz.