My son has been accused of holding and using his mobile, whist driving. This, he emphatically denies, pointing out to the three constables that his van is equipped with hands-free via Bluetooth. Despite protesting at the time that seeing clearly into the van's windscreen is very difficult unless viewed from straight in front, (which they weren't), why would he hold the phone anyway? They have sent him a three point and £60 fixed penalty notice, which in the circumstances is outrageous.

I advised a meeting with a solicitor, who told him on the phone that the cost would be £100 plus VAT. If this goes to magistrates court, the Beak will take the copper's word, three against one and the old pals act coming into play. This is blatantly wrong and unfair. Any suggestions?