What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
All down hill
An article in yesterdays paper that recommends, "Never coast in neutral; idling uses more fuel than running in gear on a closed throttle.” I don't understand how this can be. If you go down a hill for example with the car in gear but your foot off the accelerator the car is braked by the engine and gear box, whereas if you freewheel the car gains momentum and then you carry on for longer without using fuel. In both instances the car engine is still running but by coasting you use less fuel because freewheeling allows you to travel further. What is the most effective method of reducing fuel?
Asked on 25 January 2010 by AN, via email
Answered by
Honest John
If you coast out of gear the engine has to idle to remain running and to do that it uses a little fuel. If you drive down an incline with your foot off the accelerator, the fuel supply is shut off, the drivetrain of the car turns the engine, and it uses no fuel at all.
Tags:
coasting
fuel economy
Real MPG enables you to register the fuel economy you are actually getting against your make and model of car, its engine and type of transmission.
Every time you enter an average consumption figure against your car, the overall average automatically adjusts to reflect it.
Similar questions
The Department of Transport says in one its leaflets: "Don't coast downhill or towards lights in neutral as this uses more fuel" Is this true? The leaflet is called "Be a smarter driver and save money."
Twice in the past year you have answered a similar question to 'is it economical to coast in neutral down hill'. Both times your answer is wrong! Of course you are correct that in neutral the engine is...
The article by Kara Gammell in the Money Supplement in a recent Sunday Telegraph stated towards the end:- "But don't think that freewheeling down a hill will save you petrol. It won't. Not only is coasting...
.jpg)
