What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
Coast to Coast
The article by Kara Gammell in the Money Supplement in a recent Sunday Telegraph stated towards the end:- "But don't think that freewheeling down a hill will save you petrol. It won't. Not only is coasting dangerous, but due to changes in vehicle fuel systems, it will not save you any money on petrol.” Whilst accepting that freewheeling could be dangerous, I was always under the impression that it could reduce petrol consumption by anything up to 10%. What is your view on freewheeling to reduce petrol consumption?
Asked on 9 October 2011 by EJ, Frodsham
Answered by
Honest John
It doesn't. Because modern fuel systems supply no fuel to the engine when you lift your foot off the accelerator pedal. The engine is turned by the car's wheels and its drivetrain. If you put it out of gear and coast down the hill with the engine idling, the engine will use a small amount of fuel in order to idle.
Similar questions
Over the past 30 years or so I have been in the habit of coasting down long hills in neutral with the engine idling. Can coasting do any damage? I find it suits my relaxed style of driving and as I recall...
The Department of Transport says in one its leaflets: "Don't coast downhill or towards lights in neutral as this uses more fuel" Is this true? The leaflet is called "Be a smarter driver and save money."
Twice in the past year you have answered a similar question to 'is it economical to coast in neutral down hill'. Both times your answer is wrong! Of course you are correct that in neutral the engine is...
Elsewhere on 
.jpg)
