What's the insurance law?
My son's car was parked in an official parking bay and was run into by a drink driver. His insurance company have accepted responsibility but "beyond economical repair" has been mentioned. It is my understanding that it is up to the insurance company to pay for the repair even it it exceeds the value of his car - to put him in the same position as he was in before this incident. Otherwise he will be worse off through no fault of his own - and makes a mockery of having compulsory third party insurance. Can you confirm the position and what his options are please?
Asked on 18 July 2012 by Eric Law
Answered by
Honest John
No. Unfortunately case law has held that paying the market value of the car puts him in the same position as he was in before this incident.
Tags:
insurance
legal issues
We give you the low down on how to save on insurance, little-known tricks and tips, what insurance groups mean and how to use insurance aggregators to beat insurers.
Insurance group finder and how to save on insuranceSimilar questions
My daughter was involved in a minor supermarket car park incident three years ago. She denied responsibility at the time, which her insurers (Direct Line) seemed to accept, and the incident remained on...
I’ve bought a car through a salvage auction site. It's registered as a Category N write off, but upon inspection of the car at my local garage, the car has structural damage to the rear subframe and possibly...
I have a Ford Torneo that I bought in 2011. I have owned the vehicle for six years. When I bought the minibus, it had a V5 with two letters attached from the DVLA. The letters said their had been a discrepancy...
.jpg)
