Fuel consumption tests

I'm glad to see the DT taking up the cause for improving the completely unrealistic 'Official' consumption figures. As you say, manufacturers are simply designing to the test. I wrote to my MP and DfT pointing out the failures of the test and at least they replied to say change was afoot. The main failings are:
1. Temperature - how often do people drive to work in the UK at 20-30degC ambient?
2. Aerodynamics - the test is done in a lab!
3. Max speed - only 50mph or thereabouts, how can that reflect motorway driving?
4. Power variability - the test follows a speed profile, so more powerful cars will be hardly breaking into a sweat compared to, say, a small 3-cylinder.

Asked on 3 May 2012 by wiggers

Answered by Honest John
It's not the DT. It's www.honestjohn.co.uk/realmpg We now have 25,000 real driver inputs. But we are not complaining because complaints will only bring more realistic tests that will show higher true CO2 and mean higher taxes. We merely want to provide a means of showing carbuyers a realistic assessment of the fuel economy that cars are likely to achieve in average everyday motoring. In fact, in real life, the real life figures show that drivers are more likely to get better economy than the EC figures from big engined cards than they are from small engined cars.
Similar questions
I have been quoted a high fee for an infotainment software subscription on my Dacia Sandero. Will the system and reversing camera still work if I refuse the update?
My wife has the Toyota C-HR Hybrid and we have just returned from a long holiday (11 weeks) and the battery is flat. Would a solar charger be sufficient to keep the battery in good order? Does the C-HR...
Does the Citreon C1 (2009 model) have timing chains or belts?
 

Value my car

Save £75 on Warranty using code HJ75

with MotorEasy

Get a warranty quote

Save 12% on GAP Insurance

Use HJ21 to save on an ALA policy

See offer