Sharp intake of flaps
I am distressed to find myself in the process of having to spend a considerable sum of money to rectify an apparently known and acknowledged design fault/weakness in elements of the intake manifold, as well as the repair and replacement of collaterally damaged parts of the "top end" of the engine in my 2003 BMW 330d.
After just 100k miles of regularly serviced and carefully driven miles (rarely exceeding 3,000 rpm) a sudden loss of power and rear end smoke clouds was experienced, immediately found to be the fault of breaking up swirl flaps in the intake manifold. The detritus of broken spindles, rivets and parts of the flaps themselves having nowhere else to but go but into the combustion chambers have caused inevitable damage to piston crowns, valves and valve seats. All this is very expensive both in labour and genuine replacement parts to repair, over and above the cost of a replacement of the primary problem source - the manifold itself. I am advised that this "fault" has been known apparently to BMW for some time, which has, as a result modified the manifold design for production from 2004 to avoid the continuing failure of the component.
After just 100k miles of regularly serviced and carefully driven miles (rarely exceeding 3,000 rpm) a sudden loss of power and rear end smoke clouds was experienced, immediately found to be the fault of breaking up swirl flaps in the intake manifold. The detritus of broken spindles, rivets and parts of the flaps themselves having nowhere else to but go but into the combustion chambers have caused inevitable damage to piston crowns, valves and valve seats. All this is very expensive both in labour and genuine replacement parts to repair, over and above the cost of a replacement of the primary problem source - the manifold itself. I am advised that this "fault" has been known apparently to BMW for some time, which has, as a result modified the manifold design for production from 2004 to avoid the continuing failure of the component.
Asked on 1 May 2010 by R.W., via e-mail
Answered by
Honest John
It’s warned of in car-by-car breakdown at www.honestjohn.co.uk . I agree that if the car was regularly serviced at a BMW franchise the
franchise should have alerted its customers to this potential catastrophe. The trouble is, that might have exposed BMW to liability for it. Obviously if the car is not regularly serviced at a BMW franchise you could not expect BMW to root out all owners names from the DVLA and issue a warning. It would not be a “recall” because this is not a safety issue. Despite the high mileage in your case, BMW may still offer some goodwill towards the repair.
franchise should have alerted its customers to this potential catastrophe. The trouble is, that might have exposed BMW to liability for it. Obviously if the car is not regularly serviced at a BMW franchise you could not expect BMW to root out all owners names from the DVLA and issue a warning. It would not be a “recall” because this is not a safety issue. Despite the high mileage in your case, BMW may still offer some goodwill towards the repair.
Tags:
Similar questions
I have found a BMW 3 Series 2.0 SE diesel that's been owned and maintained by a mechanic for the last 6 years. It seems in good quality but is 15 years old with 150,000 on the clock. Does £1995 seem like...
The timing chain on my 2002 BMW 318i has begun to make a rattling noise. It has 146,000 miles on the clock and I rely on it for my daily travel. Should I replace the chain?
I currently drive a BMW E46 M3 and whilst I love the driving experience, as a daily drive it definitely has some short comings. My previous car was a diesel A4 B8 Avant and the one thing I really miss...
.jpg)
