Real MPG: Range Rover (2002 - 2013)
Sophisticated image backed up by superb refinement. Luxurious and stylish cabin. Feels well built. Excellent off-road ability.
Expensive to fix. Doesn't handle on-road as well as other large 4x4s. Slow steering and sometimes a lot of weight transfer.
Select engine for more Real MPG information:
| Engine | Official MPG (NEDC) | Official MPG (WLTP) | Real MPG Avg. | Real MPG % | |
| 3.6 TDV8 | 25.1 mpg | - | 24.6 mpg | 98% | |
| 4.4 TDV8 | 30.1 mpg | - | 28.6 mpg | 95% | |
| 5.0 V8 | 19.0 mpg | - | 16.0 mpg | 84% | |
| TDV8 | 25.5 mpg | - | 25.9 mpg | 101% | |
| V8 | 18.6 mpg | - | 16.4 mpg | 88% |
Read the Honest John review...
.JPG?width=310&height=175&rmode=crop)
Range Rover (2002 - 2013)
Sophisticated image backed up by superb refinement. Luxurious and stylish cabin. Feels well built. Excellent off-road ability.
Rivals
| Range Rover (2002 - 2013) | 25.0 | avg mpg |
| Volvo XC90 (2002 - 2015) | 30.2 | avg mpg |
| Toyota Land Cruiser (2003 - 2009) | 27.1 | avg mpg |
| SsangYong Rexton (2003 - 2012) | 31.2 | avg mpg |
.JPG?width=300&height=160&rmode=crop)
.jpg?width=300&height=160&rmode=crop)
Submit your Real MPG
