Real MPG: Nissan Note (2013 - 2016)
Practical design and spacious cabin. Reasonably comfortable. Clear instrument binnacle. Some clever technology on upper grades.
Not very good to drive. Refinement isn’t great. Material quality could be better.
Select engine for more Real MPG information:
| Engine | Official MPG (NEDC) | Official MPG (WLTP) | Real MPG Avg. | Real MPG % | |
| 1.2 | 60.1 mpg | - | 46.1 mpg | 77% | |
| 1.2 DIG-S | 65.7–78.5 mpg | - | 45.4 mpg | 63% | |
| 1.2 DIG-S Automatic | 55.4 mpg | - | 37.1 mpg | 67% | |
| 1.5 dCi | 78.5–80.7 mpg | - | 62.5 mpg | 79% |
Read the Honest John review...
Nissan Note (2013 - 2016)
Practical design and spacious cabin. Reasonably comfortable. Clear instrument binnacle. Some clever technology on upper grades.
Rivals
| Nissan Note (2013 - 2016) | 47.7 | avg mpg |
| Fiat Panda 4x4 (2012 - 2023) | 47.1 | avg mpg |
| Smart Fortwo (2014 - 2019) | 49.7 | avg mpg |
| Volkswagen Up (2012 - 2023) | 53.4 | avg mpg |
.jpg?width=300&height=160&rmode=crop)
Submit your Real MPG
