Real MPG: Fiat Panda (2012 on)
Cute looks. Surprisingly practical. Fantastic value for money. Really easy to drive.
Leisurely performance. Low quality interior plastics. Poor safety rating.
Select engine for more Real MPG information:
| Engine | Official MPG (NEDC) | Official MPG (WLTP) | Real MPG Avg. | Real MPG % | |
| 0.9 TwinAir | 67.3 mpg | 40.9 mpg | 47.8 mpg | 117%* | |
| 0.9 TwinAir Dualogic | 68.9 mpg | - | 41.9 mpg | 61% | |
| 0.9 TwinAir Trekking | 64.2 mpg | - | 48.0 mpg | 75% | |
| 1.0 MHEV | - | 53.3–54.2 mpg | 60.0 mpg | 112%* | |
| 1.2 | 50.4–55.4 mpg | - | 49.7 mpg | 94% | |
| 1.3 MultiJet | 72.4 mpg | - | 66.5 mpg | 92% | |
| 1.3 MultiJet Trekking | 67.3–74.3 mpg | - | 68.5 mpg | 97% |
Read the Honest John review...
Fiat Panda (2012 on)
Cute looks. Surprisingly practical. Fantastic value for money. Really easy to drive.
Rivals
| Fiat Panda (2012 on) | 50.4 | avg mpg |
| Nissan Note (2013 - 2016) | 47.7 | avg mpg |
| Chrysler Ypsilon (2012 - 2015) | 50.7 | avg mpg |
| Ford Fiesta (2013 - 2017) | 46.8 | avg mpg |
.jpg?width=300&height=160&rmode=crop)
Submit your Real MPG
