Future Classic Friday: Mercedes-Benz A-Class

Mud sticks. And there are few cars to which it stuck more in the early days than the Mercedes-Benz A-Class, which famously turned turtle during the infamous 'elk-test' - a road test carried out by the Swedish automobile publication Teknikens Värld to simulate the evasive action a driver may take to avoid a stricken moose in the road.

Unfortunately, the Mercedes A-Class was already on sale when it came unstuck, which prompted a large scale investigation into what went wrong. And in the process, glossed over what a clever piece of engineering the Mercedes A-Class actually was. 

Mercedes did the responsible thing, recalling the 2500 cars it had already sold at this point and delaying production of the others by a further three months until it found a fix.

It went as far as fitting dynamic stability control as standard to all models, a fix that cost the company £300 million in rectification and goodness knows how much more in lost sales and reputational damage.

It was a crying shame for the Mercedes A-Class, which was the German firm's first real attempt at a small car. Shorter than a Ford Focus, the aim was to bring Mercedes-like levels of luxury into a car not much bigger than the average small car. 

One of the model's major innovations was its 'sandwich' floor, which was a combination of safety aid and practical design.

The modular design of the floor structure meant that, in a frontal impact, the engine and transmission would be pushed away underneath the vehicle, minimising intrusion into the passenger cell, while at the same time the high floor and low running gear meant that interior space was as good as that of the Mercedes C-Class.

As small cars went, then, the Mercedes A-Class was one of the most spacious and also most intricately finished. It was, in many respects, a very good car indeed.

From an engineering perspective, it was clever while the raised body, low floor and innovative packaging were features that went on to appear in plenty of subsequent cars, many of which populated the same 'monobox' area of the market.

Long wheelbase luxury models and a warmed up Mercedes A190 'Brabus' edition were further interesting twists in the Mercedes A-Class tale, while the Mercedes A210 'Evolution' was as close as the model came to being a hot hatch.

It was no hardcore drivers' car, but could be hustled along quite rapdily and with minimal risk of tripping over its own antlers.

But the damage was done early on. And what should be remembered as the first truly premium supermini, wearing the oldest and boldest of names, has instead gone down in history as the 'Moose'-edes, the car that stopped them from calling the E-Class coupe the ELK.

A future classic? Well, it's certainly a car with a story behind it...

Ask HJ

Is my classic car with a modern engine ULEZ compliant?

I am looking at a classic British car that in need of restoring. It has had a "modern" engine transplant (at this stage I am not sure of the year of the engine but its around 2005). Do you know if it still would the vehicle still be ULEZ compliant?
If the vehicle is registered in the Historic Vehicle class, which will be shown on the V5C registration document, then yes, it will still be exempt from ULEZ. However, it may not be exempt from MoT testing. DVLA has issued guidance on what constitutes a "significantly modified vehicle" here: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a81f7e6ed915d74e6235144/vehicles-of-historical-interest-substantial-change-guidance.pdf
Answered by Craig Cheetham
More Questions