What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
First speeding fine - jamie745

I thought I'd share with the Back Room the fact I received my first ever speeding fine a few days ago. It occured early evening, doing around 60 on a NSL road which drops down to 30 as you go through a little business/residential area. I just let the car slow itself down as there was nothing else on the road, the road doesn't narrow or change in any way as you go past the 30 sign.

I saw a flourescent spec in the distance hiding behind a bush like a rapist and was clocked at 49mph in the 30mph limit. I explained to the noble Policeman what I just explained to all of you and he did see my point and noted himself that I was slowing down all the time from when he saw me. He did go on to say it's probably a bit harsh as I wasn't causing any danger (his words) but discretion is apparently limited these days and he had little option but to write me out a little pink slip.

Am I annoyed? Yes, very. I made that clear at the time. Apparently I'm meant to slam on the brakes, judder from 60 down to 30 within 4 yards despite the road being empty or something.

On the whole, 3 points for over 10 years of driving? Could be worse.

*waits for sarky remark from unthrottled*

First speeding fine - brum
*waits for sarky remark from unthrottled*

The world is also waiting for his judgment........

First speeding fine - Bromptonaut

You're meant to anticipate the 30 and slow down to enter the limit at that speed. If you want to risk this that and the other by slamming on anchors at last minute then that's your problem.

I'd just gently ease off and let the engine braking do the work.

First speeding fine - unthrottled

I was going to offer my (non-sarcastic) condolences. I do the same. Btw, 49mph is a long way above the posted limit. Will you get away with just 3 points?

First speeding fine - jamie745

You're meant to anticipate the 30 and slow down to enter the limit at that speed.

Well maybe so but speeding for 100 yards on an empty piece of road which doesn't alter (aside from a speed limit sign) is hardly crime of the century. The sky didn't fall in and baby children did not die in a massive fireball.

When the copper thought about it a bit he did say it's harsh and he would consider tearing it up if he could, but Police simply can't get away with that anymore.

Btw, 49mph is a long way above the posted limit. Will you get away with just 3 points?

Well I haven't heard anything otherwise. Went down the Police station on Friday and had the licence sent off. I've been told its 3 points and a £60 tax. The possibility of a Speed Awareness Course was mentioned but I seriously doubt they'd give me that for 49 in a 30 and even if they did I'm not being told I'm criminal scum for two hours.

Edited by jamie745 on 10/02/2013 at 18:27

First speeding fine - daveyjp
Many highways authorities are moving away from 60 straight to 30 as has Jamie found out too many drivers simply decide to use the 30 as the time to begin reducing speed, so well into the 30 zone they are still well above the limit. Good for the Treasury, not good for safety.

On my travels in rural areas (in particular Scotland) I have noticed far more sections of roads where limits are 60-40-30 on approach to built up areas.
First speeding fine - Bilboman

I agree that a gradual speed reduction is better all round than the sudden drop which *seems* to be designed to trap the unwary and swell the coffers. On A roads and motorways in Spain there is always a series of warning signs for a stretch of roadworks, usually in the sequence 'Roadworks' sign - 'Lane closure' sign - 'No overtaking' sign - 100 sign - 80 sign and an "end of restriction" sign where the line of cones ends. Anyone who fails to see or act upon a total of FIVE signs deserves all they get and most people seem to obey these days as driving in Spain is generally improving.
Talking of fines, a colleague recently got caught at 71 (44 mph) in a 50 (30mph) zone, just inside the "heavy penalties" zone: at 70 km/h it would only have been a lesser fine, but he was hit with 2 points and 300 Euros. No sympathy, I'm afraid...

First speeding fine - FP

"The possibility of a Speed Awareness Course was mentioned but I seriously doubt they'd give me that for 49 in a 30 and even if they did I'm not being told I'm criminal scum for two hours."

If you mean you wouldn't take a speed awareness course even if it was offered, then of course that's your choice, but to me it's a no-brainer - you sit through whatever the course consists of and count the £60 that you're saving.

Although I haven't been on one of these, the accounts that appear in the BR and elsewhere suggest it's not a question of being harangued and denigrated.

I wish I'd been offered that when I was flashed doing 46 in a 40 limit a few years back.

First speeding fine - galileo

If you mean you wouldn't take a speed awareness course even if it was offered, then of course that's your choice, but to me it's a no-brainer - you sit through whatever the course consists of and count the £60 that you're saving.

You don't sav £60, these courses cost about £80, I believe. What you do save is 3 points and a possible insurance increase.

First speeding fine - Bromptonaut

Well I haven't heard anything otherwise. Went down the Police station on Friday and had the licence sent off. I've been told its 3 points and a £60 tax. The possibility of a Speed Awareness Course was mentioned but I seriously doubt they'd give me that for 49 in a 30 and even if they did I'm not being told I'm criminal scum for two hours.

49 in a thirty is close to the boundary for a fixed penalty v appointment with the beak so 3/£60 is probably a result.

I've never seen a report of a SAC that suggested attendees were treated like crims (though that might depend on a willingness to learn).

Most report something like the ROSPA provided Driving for Work course I QA'd for work. Some of it was obvious but it made you think about how/why so you came out a better driver.

First speeding fine - Manatee

ACPO guideline is that SACs can be offered for a maximum of the speed limit +10% + 9 mph - 42mph in a 30 limit.

So an offer is unlikely in this case. Shame, it sounds as if it might be beneficial.

Edited by Manatee on 16/02/2013 at 23:10

First speeding fine - barney100

Took a lot longer than ten years to get my first speeding ticket but whilst not condoning speeding for a moment it seems that raisnig money is more of a motive than road safety. I was in the wrong but made a genuine mistake...thought a 30 limit was a 40.....I am now a driver who looks out all the time for speed limits which I think can detract attention from other important driving observations.

First speeding fine - madf

After 47 years driving what does a speeding ticket look like?

First speeding fine - Dutchie

I've had a few speeding fines not proud of them.I used to drive in my spare time test cars for the Adibis BP oil test center.Different quality oils was tested and engine wear.You had to cover a high mileage a day in the majority BMW'S and Mercedes.Got a couple of speeding tickets on the Motorway.Clean licence over the last five years I want to keep it that way.

You mentioned about slowing down to a 30mph limit and you was coasting Jamie.

My little mate Harry was killed by a car just entering our village.He was five, you was well over the 30mph limit Jamie.I understand you are saying nobody about but the next time you are coasting there could well be.

First speeding fine - jamie745

My little mate Harry was killed by a car just entering our village.He was five, you was well over the 30mph limit Jamie.I understand you are saying nobody about but the next time you are coasting there could well be.

If I ran over a 5 year old at 29mph the likelyhood is they will die, though I have no idea why a 5 year old would be in the road, unsupervised on such a road. Don't play the 'think of the children' card.

First speeding fine - the_bandit

Hit a child at 30mph and they are 50% likely to die.

Hit a child at 50mph (your speed) and they are 90% likely to die.

The speed changed from 60mph to 30mph for a reason so why don't you get over the speeding ticket, accept your mistake and learn from it.

Edited by the_bandit on 12/02/2013 at 20:28

First speeding fine - jamie745

Hit a child at 30mph and they are 50% likely to die.

Hit a child at 50mph (your speed) and they are 90% likely to die.

Ok I'll make sure I run them over at 30mph. What if I have to swerve to hit them though? That could slow me down further.

The speed changed from 60mph to 30mph for a reason

Indeed; to make money. Why else would the Police be hiding in a hedge like a rapist? I wasn't ticketed for killing a child, I was ticketed for not slamming on the brakes for no good reason. You don't see the 30mph sign until you're 100 yards from it, why put myself through the windscreen when there's nothing there?

First speeding fine - Falkirk Bairn

After 47 years driving what does a speeding ticket look like?

After 49.5 years driving what does a speeding ticket / points look like?

First speeding fine - dixgas

After 50.3 years driving, what does a speeding ticket / points look like?

First speeding fine - jamie745

Years of driving matters little compared to hours actually spent on the road. A few of the guys where I work are always out in the vans many hours a day and they've all got points. One of their newest vans is a 61 plate and its done 135,000 miles. I don't do their job but I'd have thought it simply a case of 'law of averages' that they'll get done for something somewhere.

I thought about saving the 3 points but it's not a massive deal and many insurers now treat a SAC the same as 3 points anyway as so many people get sent on them for minor 'offences.'

Edited by jamie745 on 12/02/2013 at 16:47

First speeding fine - Drivethru

Do police camera vans usually clock you from the back window, I know some can get you from the front of the van and even the sides but would the norm be from the back window.

First speeding fine - Bromptonaut

Do police camera vans usually clock you from the back window, I know some can get you from the front of the van and even the sides but would the norm be from the back window.

The camera vans here (Northants) are invariably facing in the direction of traffic with the machine doing it's bit thruogh smoked glass at rear. I think it can only watch one vehicle at once which saved me on the 40 that could still be 70 on the road out to M1/J16

First speeding fine - dan86

Im on the road up to 9 hours a day and so far iv not got a ticket but as iv grown up and had kids my attitude has changed and I don't drive around like lunatic I used to in my younger days.

First speeding fine - wemyss

After 56.3 years driving what does a speeding ticket/points look like ?.

Does anyone know what a black catter is ?????.

wemyss

First speeding fine - freman

After 67 years perhaps someone could tell me what a parking ticket looks like in addition to a speeding ticket.

I was an I.A.M. member until a few years ago but it seemed that as it stopped getting any advantages it was'nt worth the annual membership fee.

I think that this may have been part of the black cat influance.

First speeding fine - Leif

"He did go on to say it's probably a bit harsh as I wasn't causing any danger (his words)

That would be the case then with everyone he caught, in which case either he chose the spot, and he was lying to you, or his superior(s) chose the spot, and he has to do as instructed.

Anyway, speed limits are not just for 'safety', they can be imposed to reduce road noise.

Apparently I'm meant to slam on the brakes, judder from 60 down to 30 within 4 yards despite the road being empty or something.

Or you use forward observation, see the sign, and slow before you reach it. I'm tempted to suggest poor driving on your part, but I would be a hypocrite if I did. :)

I would prefer they used these speed traps in poor weather, and at night (impossible though) as that would trap the lunatics.

First speeding fine - jamie745

Anyway, speed limits are not just for 'safety', they can be imposed to reduce road noise.

I'm sure taking an extra 70 yards to slow down in the early evening caused great pain and disruption to the local community.

First speeding fine - skidpan

I'm sure taking an extra 70 yards to slow down in the early evening caused great pain and disruption to the local community.

Don't you possibly think that an extra 70 yards could have caused great pain and suffering to a child or any person, dog, horse etc.

Have a little more consideration for others.

How much time does it actually save you, probably a couple of seconds.

First speeding fine - corax

I'm sure taking an extra 70 yards to slow down in the early evening caused great pain and disruption to the local community.

Don't you possibly think that an extra 70 yards could have caused great pain and suffering to a child or any person, dog, horse etc.

How often does that actually happen though? Children usually get killed because they run out from between parked cars. Dogs just run out into the road regardless, and horses ridden by riders can usually be seen far ahead.

There would be less fatalities and accidents if people actually used their eyes more and read the road ahead rather than doing their hair and make up, gibbering down their mobile phones or texting.

Less camera's, more responsibility. It's not going to happen though. The standard of driving gets worse by the year, and I find myself increasingly surrounded by talentless apes.

First speeding fine - nortones2

If there were no cameras, a proportion of the population wouldn't slow much, if at all. There is the occasional police driver, but they are a dwindling resource.

First speeding fine - FP

"If there were no cameras, a proportion of the population wouldn't slow much, if at all."

I agree.

What the whole argument about speed cameras comes down to, in my opinion, is personal responsibility. Previously, if you were a good driver you were aware of road conditions, you were observant of other drivers and considerate of them and you knew what your vehicle was capable of and you adapted your speed accordingly. Of course, a proportion of drivers never reached this standard.

Now, because of the sheer numbers of cars on the road, plus a general decline in people's sense of responsibility, together with a sense of invulnerability induced by a huge advance in car safety design, the significance of accidents seems that much greater.

Speed camers are a very blunt instrument. I have no doubt they do curb at least some irresponsible driving, but they also penalise responsible drivers who are basically safe, but who make a small error of judgment, or simply fail to be observant enough to spot the camera.

First speeding fine - Leif

I'm sure taking an extra 70 yards to slow down in the early evening caused great pain and disruption to the local community.

I suppose if you don't care about anyone else then you can take that attitude. If the speed limit was to keep noise down, then hey who gives a damn if the residents suffer excessive traffic noise. If the limit was there because there is a hidden hazard, such as a hidden driveway, then hey who cares about the safety of the residents.

Don't you possibly think that an extra 70 yards could have caused great pain and suffering to a child or any person, dog, horse etc.

Have a little more consideration for others.

How much time does it actually save you, probably a couple of seconds.

The problem with your response is that we know that quite often, but by no means always, the speed limit starts on a stretch of road with no fixed hazards and good visibility. We have a 40 that starts where there is woodland on one side and a parallel road on the other side, with houses. But the limit is soon reduced to 30mph which is appropriate. So in this case doing as per Jamie would be anti-social but not dangerous, assuming there weren't hazards such as horses, dog walkers etc about of course.

First speeding fine - Leif

Anyway, speed limits are not just for 'safety', they can be imposed to reduce road noise.

I'm sure taking an extra 70 yards to slow down in the early evening caused great pain and disruption to the local community.

By the way, given that you did not see the new limit until you were almost on it, what chance is there that you would see hazards, such as pedestrians or horse riders in dark clothing? So I think thre is good reason for you to obey the limit since you have already demonstrated poor observation skills. (Not that I always spot the limit, of course. Some signs are obscured by vegetation, or damaged. That is my excuse anyway. )

First speeding fine - thunderbird

They sorted it in our village. They moved the limit signs back 200 yards or more at both ends. Then they posted camera vans regularly at each end and made a fortune.

Not as many doing 60 or more as they pass the start of the houses now.

Great improvment.

First speeding fine - Ethan Edwards

Didn't a Gubbermint not unlike ours say recently that Labours' war on the motorist was over?

Perhaps they meant to say a whole new wave of Tory terror is to sweep over the land to help us pay for windy mills and chavs, both of which don't actually work and our funding of foreign corrupt regimes and dictators thereof.

Well if it's war they want we'll see how tough they are when they are wanting us to vote them back into their over paid little jobs. Ditto local poly trickans.

First speeding fine - Leif

Didn't a Gubbermint not unlike ours say recently that Labours' war on the motorist was over?

Perhaps they meant to say a whole new wave of Tory terror is to sweep over the land to help us pay for windy mills and chavs, both of which don't actually work and our funding of foreign corrupt regimes and dictators thereof.

Well if it's war they want we'll see how tough they are when they are wanting us to vote them back into their over paid little jobs. Ditto local poly trickans.

We are building windmills to satisfy EU emissions regs. Failure would mean fines. The funding for problem families is having success, and should pay back in terms of less problem families, less crime etc.

Well at least Labour did not take us to war in far off countries ... oh hang on a minute ...

Can't say I'm keen on Cameron, but is Wallace aka Milliband any better? Do you trust the party that wants to increase spending when we earn less than we spend as it is?

First speeding fine - jamie745

We are building windmills to satisfy EU emissions regs. Failure would mean fines.

Which is why we need to leave the European Union as soon as possible. Their bonkers emission laws are already driving industry to India and the EU's economic output is declining every single year. Since when could a great, proud, historic nation like ours be fined by anybody? Makes you sick doesn't it, especially as none of us have ever voted for it.

Do you trust the party that wants to increase spending when we earn less than we spend as it is?

No but the problem is you're talking about all three main parties there. The Conservatives are also committed to spending more than we earn. The differences between the three parties is incredibly marginal, just three brands of social democracy run by three career politicians who've never done a days work in their lives. They play up their tiny differences but on the big issues they're all the same.

With that in mind I'll be voting UKIP next time round, even if it does engineer a Labour win because...well...what difference would it make anyway?

First speeding fine - madf

Jamie obviously thinks we have a Conservative Governement

We do not.

As for UKIP? Al and Di from the Aldi advert on Home and Away make more sense.

First speeding fine - jamie745

Jamie obviously thinks we have a Conservative Governement

Hardly. If you read what I actually wrote you'll see I described the Conservatives as another brand of social democracy. I said all three main parties are essentially identical and it makes no difference which one wins.

I used to mock UKIP but the days of Kilroy-Silk are over, Farage has done a very good job and they're the only party broadly saying what I think. The status-quo establishment do their best to destroy them, obviously, because UKIP are a threat to the establishment so they'll rally to convince you there is no alternative to the LibLabCon.

That tactic has been played throughout history and always by desperate oligarchs who are running scared. I'm not falling for it. Are you?

First speeding fine - Collos25

I wonder if you go on a political forum they talk about motoring.

First speeding fine - jamie745

Unfortunately it's not a huge leap from speeding fines to politics;

Speeding fines - money - Government revenue - politics.

First speeding fine - nortones2

Nigel is perhaps so comfortable as an MEP in enemy territory that he doesn't seem to want to contest Eastleigh. Opportunity missed? Or acknowledgement that life is so much more rewarding on an MEP salary with EU special tax rates and expenses. The work he carries out as an MEP is hardly demanding, as he rarely attends. Leaving room to play the nearly man. Surrendering the sinecure on one hand, and making a risky bid for a UKIP seat in the HP is not to be taken lightly for a leader, n'est pas? Just suppose he stood, and the voters say non. The "establishment" won't destroy him: the electorate might.

First speeding fine - jamie745

Or acknowledgement that life is so much more rewarding on an MEP salary with EU special tax rates and expenses.

A) MEPs don't get expenses, they get allowances and every MEP of every party gets exactly the same.

B) Nigel Farage used to be a City trader and earned a damned sight more there than the 70k odd pre-tax you get as an MEP - and probably put in far fewer hours.

The work he carries out as an MEP is hardly demanding

You could say that about every MEP, yet I don't see you complaining about Labour/LibDem/Tory MEPs who are all there just to pick up the money.

as he rarely attends.

The more time you spend in Brussells - the more allowances you receive. You're incentivised to stay out of your constituency and in Belgium, hence why MEPs refer to it as SISO - Sign In and Sod Off.

Farage probably does more travelling, campaigning and actual work than any other MEP we send to that mysterious place. Do you even know the name of any Labour/Tory MEP?

This 'UKIP are just in Brussells for the money' line has been used by the establishment for years, they accused Alex Salmond of the same thing when he was in the House of Commons campaigning for his country to not be part of it.

UKIP voters want Farage in Brussells because frankly he's more use there than in Eastleigh.

The "establishment" won't destroy him: the electorate might.

The electorate gets what it deserves then. If you feel our interests are best served by the LibLabCon - who are all exactly the same party - then you go ahead and vote for them.

First speeding fine - nortones2

"UKIP voters want Farage in Brussells because frankly he's more use there than in Eastleigh."

Why? Do you think he has any, any, influence in the EU? If Nigel wants power, he'd better start at home. Just because he got a seat in a barely contested election doesn't mean he can where the other parties lay into his lack of support other than the mayflies he currently attracts.

First speeding fine - unthrottled

can where the other parties lay into his lack of support other than the mayflies he currently attracts.

Why do Ukip's detractors always want to play the man rather than the ball? There's always the snide suggestion that anyone who dares to express doubts about the glorious European Project must be a xenophobic 'fruitcake' ormerrie Englander. Perhaps it's because the list of the EU's tangible achievements is rather small. In fact, since the failure of the Euro, all the Europhiles have left is scaremongering and unfalsifiable claim such as:

"If it weren't for the European Union, there would be another war in Europe"

(Conveniently ignoring all the years following the end of WWII when there wasn't an EU or a war in Europe.

or,

"If we withdraw from the EU, British trade would suffer"

(Conveniently ignoring the fact that most of our trade with Europe is imports. I can't really see France refusing to sell us wine, or the Germans refusing to sell us cars)

Then there's the spurious claim that the British are 'bad' Europeans. How many Poles are there in 'good' European countries like France or Germany? Not many, because they're not permitted to work there The only countries which upheld the principle of free movement of people were Ireland and the UK.

If it weren't for the fruitcakes, we too would be stuck in the quagmire that is the Euro.


First speeding fine - jamie745

Why do Ukip's detractors always want to play the man rather than the ball?

Because if we play the game with the ball then UKIPs arguments actually win. For the first decade the establishment just ignored them, when that ceased to be possible they set about denigrating UKIP (loonies, fruitcakes, closet racists etc).

"If it weren't for the European Union, there would be another war in Europe"

(Conveniently ignoring all the years following the end of WWII when there wasn't an EU or a war in Europe.

They ignore the fact stable democracies don't shoot each other, they believe the existance of individual countries causes war so we must break them up and live as one. There was no prospect of a post-war, democratic Germany invading anybody, frankly. I find that line quite insulting to the good people who have run Germany since 1945.

The establishment claiming 'without this, everything would be worse' is hardly new. Afterall they did that with slavery and the corn laws.

"If we withdraw from the EU, British trade would suffer"

(Conveniently ignoring the fact that most of our trade with Europe is imports. I can't really see France refusing to sell us wine, or the Germans refusing to sell us cars)

We are the EU's biggest export market in the World. If they tried to put up trade barriers to stop BMW selling cars here then BMW would bring down the German Government inside about 3 minutes. You don't need politics to do business. Switzerland and Norway have free trade with the EU without being members paying £50m a day.

However massive British corperates might suffer. Afterall, EU membership makes tax avoidance much easier, hence why the congolomerates mouthpiece, the CBI (who advocated joining the Euro in 2001) claim we'd lose jobs without EU membership.

Edited by jamie745 on 13/02/2013 at 21:01

First speeding fine - Leif

Nigel is perhaps so comfortable as an MEP in enemy territory

Not exactly the best advert is he, sitting in a cushy euro seat with nice pay, and not doing much.

First speeding fine - Leif
No but the problem is you're talking about all three main parties there. The Conservatives are also committed to spending more than we earn. The differences between the three parties is incredibly marginal, just three brands of social democracy run by three career politicians who've never done a days work in their lives. They play up their tiny differences but on the big issues they're all the same.

With that in mind I'll be voting UKIP next time round, even if it does engineer a Labour win because...well...what difference would it make anyway?

They are different, but yes they are career politicians, too many lawyers and marketing peeps rather than business peeps and scientists. UKIP must be sponsored by Labour.

First speeding fine - jamie745

Why? Do you think he has any, any, influence in the EU? If Nigel wants power, he'd better start at home.

He has no influence in the EU because the EU is run by unelected people. His influence is in hammering the Eurocrats and it ending up on Youtube, attracting followers and hopefully turning into votes back at home to get us out of the EU.

Nigel doesn't want power, if he wanted power he'd have sat at the back of the room in the Tory party and just quietly wandered into a job. Nigel wants the country to have a referendum on EU membership and doesn't really care which party gives it to us.

Not exactly the best advert is he, sitting in a cushy euro seat with nice pay, and not doing much.

You can say that about every MEP from every party, yet you only target one? What do you suggest he does instead? Tiny parties can take several decades to break through under FPTP in the UK and UKIP needed a platform so they targeted the European Parliament where they lead it's first ever opposition. You say 'nice pay' but I wouldn't do the hours he does, with the agro he gets for 70k a year pre-tax.

You say he doesn't do much, but if it wasn't for UKIP we wouldn't even be talking about the EU in this country and Cameron wouldn't have been forced into that speech a couple of weeks ago.

UKIP must be sponsored by Labour.

Oh I'm sure, but Labour don't realise many 'old labour' people have gone UKIP as well, but they are a bigger threat to Cameron obviously. Camerons own fault, if he wants to shoot UKIP dead then call the referendum before 2015.

First speeding fine - wemyss

Cameron won't need to worry too much about UKIP as the media will do it for him. Those who remember the referendum of whether or not to stay in the Common Market may recall the polls a few weeks before the referendum showed a huge majority for leaving it.

However a vast effort by the media reversed this and the staying in vote won by a huge majority. Already planning will in be play to discredit Nigel and UKIP. They will get my vote of protest anyway as I vowed years ago never again to vote for any of the main parties.

wemyss

First speeding fine - nortones2

If "He has no influence in the EU because the EU is run by unelected people." were true, which is absurd, why does Farage take part in it, and claim allowances and expenses from a tainted source? BTW, his allowances and expenses seem to have remained opaque despite promising to post details on his website. Too busy perhaps?

Re "UKIP needed a platform so they targeted the European Parliament where they lead it's first ever opposition." Rubbish. There are 7 groupings, some of which have had major disputes amongst themselves. They don't need UKIP for that.

First speeding fine - jamie745

If "He has no influence in the EU because the EU is run by unelected people." were true, which is absurd,

It is true. The Commission has the power and no citizen of Europe has voted for any of those people to have those jobs. The 'European Parliament' is a sham as it's the unelected Commission which reserves sole right to propose legislation. President Barroso even boasted that he was 'elected' by the European Council via a secret ballot.

why does Farage take part in it, and claim allowances and expenses from a tainted source?

Why did Alex Salmond sit in Westminster for years while campaigning for Scotland to leave it?

What would you have Farage do instead exactly? Have you never heard of keeping your enemies closer or joining something to bring it down? The European Parliament gives his cause the biggest platform he could get. He gives the anti-EU movement a voice from exactly where the EU don't want it - in their own back yard. They absolutely hate him which must be a good sign.

From there he's been able to start a debate which the LibLabCon don't want to have, he's denied the Tories a majority in 2010, taken his minority party to solid 3rd in the opinion polls and forced a PM to make a speech on Europe for the first time in 40 years. Could he have done that as a councillor in some Surrey backwater or constantly coming third in by-elections?

BTW, his allowances and expenses seem to have remained opaque despite promising to post details on his website. Too busy perhaps?

It doesn't really matter if they're published because every MEP gets the same amount in a lump sum anyway. As I said, the fact he doesn't attend Brussells that often - something you criticise him for - means he's actually missed out on allowances.

Nigel Farage is someone who in the early 90s decided he couldn't vote for anyone on the ballot list so rather than doing nothing - like you - he decided to stand himself, even though it meant giving up a career with a better wage than any MEP. I can always respect someone who got off their a*** and fought for what they believe in, rather than sitting in their armchair and just throwing abuse at everyone else - like you.

People like you will sit in your armchair, slate everybody who says something you find uncomfortable and keep voting for the LibLabCon MEP's to transfer power from Britain to Brussells every single day. I don't want to be asked by my grandson in 60 years time why I did nothing to stop Britain becoming part of a European Superstate with people like Barroso at the top.

First speeding fine - nortones2

Legislation is proposed by the Commission. European Parliament decides, and debates the issues. Farage just a noise and is an embarrassment. When UKIP puts up for Parliament they will be part of the formal political process, or not. The only abuse here comes from the usual source.

First speeding fine - jamie745

The point is only the unelected Commission can propose legislation and once it's become law, there is nothing you or me can do in any general election to change it, unless you vote for a party which will leave the EU. I'm not interested in arguing how the institution works because I want my country out of it, I don't really care how the EU controls our lives, I just care that it does.

No wonder turnout is less than two-thirds in general elections now, our Government controls extremely little so we may as well vote for that penguin for all the difference it makes.

Farage just a noise and is an embarrassment.

The embarassments are the people who invented the Euro and still claim it's a success. People like David Cameron, Nick Clegg, Gordon Brown, Tony Blair and the rest of the political class who have constantly lied to us and given away our democratic control of our country are the real embarassments.

The only abuse here comes from the usual source.

My great-grandfather died for my liberty and freedom, as did many other great men twice in the last century. Our political class have given much of that liberty and freedom away to the EU and although times have changed and it's not the Nazi police or the Soviet gulags, it's still an erosion of democracy which I find disgusting. If you're standing in my way of getting that back then I can have no respect for you as a person, sorry.

First speeding fine - Leif

Legislation is proposed by the Commission. European Parliament decides, and debates the issues.

Indeed. However, does anyone know who the MEPs are, what they are debating, and what they decide? The answer is no, they don't. Which means that they are not held to account, and in many respects the EU is no more than a junket for many MEP's, and for others it is a power trip. They make laws, and feel self important. In practice many laws are plain stupid (such as requiring cars to carry spare bulbs, even though many can only be replaced by a garage) and others result from horse trading i.e. we pass this law which suits your country, if you pass that law which suits us. There is at present an attempt to destroy the UK banking industry, because we dominate banking in Europe. The accession of Eastern European countries was encouraged by bribing the new entrants, legally of course, in order to make the EU commissioners even more important. We no longer have control of our borders, we do not have ultimate control over our laws, the EU is moving towards political union, it just gets worse.

Farage just a noise and is an embarrassment. When UKIP puts up for Parliament they will be part of the formal political process, or not. The only abuse here comes from the usual source.

Yes, Farage is an embarrassment.

First speeding fine - Leif

Why? Do you think he has any, any, influence in the EU? If Nigel wants power, he'd better start at home.

He has no influence in the EU because the EU is run by unelected people. His influence is in hammering the Eurocrats and it ending up on Youtube, attracting followers and hopefully turning into votes back at home to get us out of the EU.

The EU is run by elected MEPs. However, no-one really knows who they are, what they do, and what the EU does, so in many respects the EU is anti-democratic, and pro self interested bureacrats.

Not exactly the best advert is he, sitting in a cushy euro seat with nice pay, and not doing much.

You can say that about every MEP from every party, yet you only target one?

Because of hypocrisy. He argues against the EU, and yet he is an MEP and has a dismal voting record, preferring to take the money and not participate fully, even if only to argue against the EU. His verbally abusing Von Rumpuy was childish.

You say he doesn't do much, but if it wasn't for UKIP we wouldn't even be talking about the EU in this country and Cameron wouldn't have been forced into that speech a couple of weeks ago.

Sadly that is true. Or perhaps not sadly, it is about time we actually debated the EU beyond the facile sound bite-ism of Labourites. "Oooh, if we leave the EU, the economy will collapse, companies will pull out of the EU, the earth will open up, flames will leap out of the depths and consume anyone not wiped out by plaque and pestilence, and if we stay it will be all cuddly, lovely and soooo nice darling, care for some more avocado dip?." Or something like that, I'm sure the actual Labour response would make the preceding sentence sound sensible.

Oh I'm sure, but Labour don't realise many 'old labour' people have gone UKIP as well, but they are a bigger threat to Cameron obviously. Camerons own fault, if he wants to shoot UKIP dead then call the referendum before 2015.

I don't believe Reds would go UKIP.

First speeding fine - jamie745

The EU is run by elected MEPs.

No it's not. Only the unelected Commission of Civil Servants can set the agenda, propose the creation and repeal of legislation. The EU has already removed elected leaders in Eurozone countries so I'd argue the EU hates the very notion of democracy.

Because of hypocrisy. He argues against the EU, and yet he is an MEP

So in your world you're only allowed to be an MEP if you 100% agree with the entire project?

He became an MEP to find out what goes on 'over there' where nobody is looking and report back here. He's there to give a voice of opposition. Alex Salmond sat in the Commons for years while campaigning for his country to not be under its rule. There is plenty of historical precident of people joining Parliaments they don't want to be in so can we drop this ridiculous 'hypocrisy' argument please?

Have you never heard of keeping your enemies closer or joining things to bring them down? His MEP status gives him the biggest possible platform for the anti-EU message and brilliantly that platform is where the EU least want it - their own backyard.

and has a dismal voting record, preferring to take the money and not participate fully

Good. I don't want him participating in the project. If he participated then you could accuse him of hypocrisy but thankfully he always votes against the EU or doesn't vote at all. His voters put him there because they want us out of the EU, not because they want Farage to make it work better for us.

I'd say the LibLabCon, who take the money while going out of their way to destroy British democracy, jobs and industry are even more of an insult than someone who just takes the cash and causes us no harm.

His verbally abusing Von Rumpuy was childish.

It was no worse than what you see in the Commons every week.

I don't believe Reds would go UKIP.

Well that depends. Don't forget as recently as 1983, withdrawal from the EEC was in the Labour manifesto. In the 70s they were the opposition to us joining the common market, they said it'd damage jobs and democracy and they were right.

The Labour leadership (much like the Tories) is now so far removed from it's general voting base it's unreal. It's traditional, patriotic working class Labour who see the effects of uncontrolled, mass immigration every day and list it as one of their biggest concerns. The Labour Party left those people behind a long time ago.

First speeding fine - Leif

The EU is run by elected MEPs.

No it's not. Only the unelected Commission of Civil Servants can set the agenda, propose the creation and repeal of legislation.

No they don't. They implement the decisions of the elected representatives. Or at least that should be the case, assuming the elected reps take the lead as they are supposed to. I suppose you might get the "Oui M. le ministre, cela est une decision tres brave" ...

The EU has already removed elected leaders in Eurozone countries so I'd argue the EU hates the very notion of democracy.

I agree with that. The founders of the EU knew it was to be a political union, and not to tell the public as they would not agree to that.

I don't believe Reds would go UKIP.

Well that depends. Don't forget as recently as 1983, withdrawal from the EEC was in the Labour manifesto. In the 70s they were the opposition to us joining the common market, they said it'd damage jobs and democracy and they were right.

The Labour leadership (much like the Tories) is now so far removed from it's general voting base it's unreal. It's traditional, patriotic working class Labour who see the effects of uncontrolled, mass immigration every day and list it as one of their biggest concerns. The Labour Party left those people behind a long time ago.

Nonsense. So why do Labour lead the polls by a large margin? Why has Dead Millipede stated that Labour got it wrong on immigration?

First speeding fine - jamie745

No they don't. They implement the decisions of the elected representatives. Or at least that should be the case

It should be but it isn't. Everybody - except the EFD group lead by UKIP - is a total fanatic supporter of the concept of political union and a federal Europe. Everybody agrees. The Commission holds the power, some of whom are former communists from the Soviet regime and none of whom have been elected by the public.

In Westminster, elected people set the agenda and the civil servants carry out their instructions. In Brussels it's the other way around.

Nonsense. So why do Labour lead the polls by a large margin? Why has Dead Millipede stated that Labour got it wrong on immigration?

Labour lead because people want the free money taps turned back on and they think Labour is the only alternative. Interestingly those same polls say the public still trust Osborne more than Balls on the economy, so that huge lead is soft.

Labour did get it wrong on immigration but as EU members no British Government can change those rules so his speech is worthless. Labour left their patriotic working class behind when they signed up to Eastern European expansion and told us we need them because the British working class are useless, feckless and lazy. That's when they left those people behind.

First speeding fine - Avant

This thread has drifted away from motoring. Moved to General.

First speeding fine - jamie745

There are 7 groupings, some of which have had major disputes amongst themselves.

The only disputes they've had is over how much power and influence the EU should have. Either quite a bit or an awful lot. UKIP lead the EFD group arguing that the EU should have no power or influence and should cease to exist.

Federalists arguing with federalists over just how federal our continent should become is hardly a 'major dispute' in the eyes of those who don't want federalism at all.

First speeding fine - nortones2

The far right group, of which UKIP is a member, take EU money to fund nationalistic dreams and party funds. In value for money terms UKIP and their very unsavoury group of associates are conspicuous by their absence from EU Parliament. Taking cash for non-EU parliamentary purposes is not playing the game! OLAF will take action, in due course. A number of UKIP MEPs have had to refund ill-gotten gains to the EU already. But, of course, the much vaunted transparency of UKIP wouldn't show this, as the quarterly statements of cash flow have yet to be published. Nigel isn't in power, but his promises are forgotten already.

The current negotiations on EU and USA free trade will make the UKIP single-topic agenda even more absurd. The idea of a free-trade arrangement, as with Norway, has a blind spot. The US might prefer the UK to be within the tent, but its just a sentimental old idea, with no cash advantage to the USA. Norway negotiated openly and in advance. Joining the EU, then pulling out, as UKIP wish, makes any negotiation on the matter crippled from the start, leaving aside the settling of scores caused by lack of solidarity with fellow European countries.

As for ancestral sacrifices: you are not alone. Don't presume sacrifices lead in a particular direction. A common error by fundamentalists.

First speeding fine - jamie745

The far right group, of which UKIP is a member, take EU money to fund nationalistic dreams and party funds

The European Union last year spent several billions of taxpayers money advertising itself in schools, universities and generally pushing it's own propaganda. Now they're employing EU civil servants to go on social media and 'correct' any criticism of the Union, in fact I reckon you probably are one of them. Nobody can be as stupid as you unless they're paid to be.

UKIP and their very unsavoury group of associates

European politics is extreme, especially in the south. You'll find unsavoury people where the UK Labour Party sit as well, but nobody bothers to mention that.

Taking cash for non-EU parliamentary purposes is not playing the game

There's no evidence anybody currently in UKIP has done that, but they have used some money from the 'information fund' to publish information the EU may not like people to know, if that's what you mean.

A number of UKIP MEPs have had to refund ill-gotten gains to the EU already. But, of course, the much vaunted transparency of UKIP wouldn't show this.

UKIP had problems with a few members and sacked them on the spot, where as the LibLabCon pushed the 'everyone was doing it' defence and still have many of their thieves in Parliament, both here and in Brussels.

The current negotiations on EU and USA free trade will make the UKIP single-topic agenda even more absurd.

First off, you are absolutely absurd and secondly; UKIP isn't a single issue party.

leaving aside the settling of scores caused by lack of solidarity with fellow European countries.

That's just total guff, I have no idea what you mean there. If by 'lack of solidarity' you mean Merkel not liking Cameron then I don't really care if politicians like each other. They can't cut us off from trade because we're the biggest paymaster of the EU economy.

Don't presume sacrifices lead in a particular direction. A common error by fundamentalists.

You are the fundamentalist and you are frankly dangerous. Tell me, do you plan to vote for the LibLabCon to further erode British democracy and freedom? If you're going to vote for them professional shysters then how on Earth can you criticise UKIP for anything?

First speeding fine - Dutchie

I beleive the biggest paymasters are Germany Jamie.Don't think Mrs Merkel will be bothered about likes or dislikes.Politicans are a devious breed the truth about anything is the last on their agenda.The Brits have been conned I mean jo blogs the benefits which where promised we never got.We now rely on foreign companies to create jobs in the UK.

This lot will be kicked out in the next election but who to vote for who will make a change to better our soceity.

First speeding fine - jamie745

By 'biggest paymaster' I was referring to the fact we are the EU's biggest export market in the world. We are the biggest export market for German cars, Spanish holidays, French wines, you name it; we buy it. If 'three million UK jobs depend on EU membership' as we're so often told, then six million continental jobs depend on the UK being a member.

The reality is you don't need political union in order to do business, we don't need to turn Europe into a federal state just to trade with French companies, so the only jobs reliant on EU membership are the jobs of certain politicians/civil servants. The bottom line is the EU couldn't afford to let us leave without a free trade arrangement and that's been acknowledged by the EU themselves since the late 1990s.

As for the next election, my view is simple; All three main parties are almost identical. On the major issues they all agree with each other and they're all led by various incarnations of the same slippery career politician. The EU controls so much now anyway that it's almost irrelevant who occupies No 10. Policy on immigration, energy, financial services regulation, environmental legislation, employment law and many other areas are now mostly controlled by Brussels and short of leaving the EU, no vote we make in any election can change any of it.

So with that in mind I'm going for UKIP. They're not perfect but nobody is, in 2010 I was of the mind that a UKIP vote engineered a Labour win, I'm now of the view that it makes little difference anyway so I might as well vote for who I disagree with the least.

First speeding fine - Ben 10

10 years driving experience Jamie.Shock, horror! That explains a lot about you and your views on here.

Suck it up and stop feeling sorry for yourself with excuses and wanting sympathetic empathy. You're reacting like a spoilt brat.Put those toys back in your pram.

It happens this time you've been caught. Count the number of times you've got away with it over such a" long time of driving", and with all that experience too.

No sympathy from me son, just take the points and pay the fine and consider yourself lucky you didn't wind up further in the do do.

First speeding fine - jamie745

Wasn't actually asking for sympathy, my purpose was actually to warn people that they now need to slam on the brakes for no reason because the tax collectors are out in force this week.

First speeding fine - Dutchie

I do agree it makes more sense to have a 60 to 40 to 30 mph reduction in speed.Could save lives and speeding ticketts.

First speeding fine - Manatee

Spent a few days in Scotland last month. Very common in Dumfriesshire to have countdown markers to 30 limits on main roads, and useful too.

I've seen a few this side of the border, but not many.

First speeding fine - FP

"...they now need to slam on the brakes for no reason..."

Never let the wisdom of others prevent a good bit of exaggeration!

Here's a good reason: £60 and three points. And with a bit of extra care, you can even avoid the slamming-on-the-brakes bit.

Edited by FP on 17/02/2013 at 18:21

First speeding fine - Leif

Wasn't actually asking for sympathy, my purpose was actually to warn people that they now need to slam on the brakes for no reason because the tax collectors are out in force this week.

No, you needed to slam on the brakes because you have poor observation skills. So in your case, I think the speed limit really is needed, and the fine and points will be of benefit. Other drivers look ahead, and judge their speed to match. It certainly is true that a transition from 60 to 30 can mean braking rather than natural slowing, so count down signs to 30 would be of benefit.

Of course it is always possible both speed limit signs were obscured, in which case you should have taken photos and fought the 'conviction'. It is rare but it does happen.

I live in an area where the speed limits are not silly, but when I lived in the Luton area, they were often perverse, and probably aimed at making money, given the poverty in the area. Silly speed limits and large numbers of cameras seem more common in poor areas. I suppose you could argure that the poor are bad drivers, but I think the real reason is that the council does not get enough income, and sees speeding as a cash cow.

First speeding fine - Leif

By 'biggest paymaster' I was referring to the fact we are the EU's biggest export market in the world. We are the biggest export market for German cars, Spanish holidays, French wines, you name it; we buy it. If 'three million UK jobs depend on EU membership' as we're so often told, then six million continental jobs depend on the UK being a member.

The reality is you don't need political union in order to do business, we don't need to turn Europe into a federal state just to trade with French companies, so the only jobs reliant on EU membership are the jobs of certain politicians/civil servants. The bottom line is the EU couldn't afford to let us leave without a free trade arrangement and that's been acknowledged by the EU themselves since the late 1990s.

Indeed, but I bet few people see it like that and the "we'll lose jobs" bogeyman will keep us in the EU.

First speeding fine - jamie745

Indeed, but I bet few people see it like that and the "we'll lose jobs" bogeyman will keep us in the EU.

Which is why the battle starts now.

I must say I find your UKIP stance extremely cut-nose-spite-face. They're the only party expressing your views on the European Union yet you seem opposed to voting for them because Nigel Farage has gone to Brussels and expressed your views to the Eurocrats faces? Very strange. Who can you vote for? The LibLabCon who all disagree with you?

I've already explained how theres historical precident of people joining political clubs they want to bring down, so the 'he's an MEP' argument doesn't wash, but let's look at pure practicalities; The establishment, who all agree with this EU project are the ones with the secretaries, access to multi-million-pound advertising funds and access to the local, national and international media to push their agenda. In the early 90s it became obvious there was no opposition to this, so UKIP was formed - nature abhors a vaccum and all that.

Now if you're going to start a campaign against this establishment consensus, what you need more than anything else is income. Farage spent years doing 26 hour days touring the country, giving speeches, getting his hands on every single piece of media spotlight he could grab - even if it was to be broadcast overseas instead, anything is a help - and you can't hold down a full time job which would pay you enough to do all of that at the same time.

They couldn't target a general election because to break through in First-past-post you need to be known - it took the Greens 40 years to get an MP - so that was unrealistic. The best option was to stand for the European Parliament, cash in on the 'sod the lot of them' voting pattern of a populace more willing to vote for minor parties in such elections and use the EU as the platform for the campaign against it.

I can always respect someone who got off their a*** and did something, rather than people like us who debate online about it from our armchair. What would you have had Farage do instead? That's my question. What would've given the anti-EU message a bigger platform than the EU's own backyard? What course would've turned UKIP from nobodies to a major threat to the Tories within just 20 years?

Sometimes you have to join your enemies to bring them down.

First speeding fine - Leif

Indeed, but I bet few people see it like that and the "we'll lose jobs" bogeyman will keep us in the EU.

Which is why the battle starts now.

I must say I find your UKIP stance extremely cut-nose-spite-face. They're the only party expressing your views on the European Union yet you seem opposed to voting for them because Nigel Farage has gone to Brussels and expressed your views to the Eurocrats faces? Very strange. Who can you vote for? The LibLabCon who all disagree with you?

My view of UKIP is based on my knowledge of the people involved and the somewhat unpleasant in-fighting. Farage has demonstrated by his behaviour that he is a border line loony, and I would not vote for someone like that. He is a self publicist with a huge ego, and a big mouth. I simply would not want to have that person represent me. He engages too much in crass statements and sound bites. Now you might say "Ah yes, so he is a politician", but I find him too extreme. I could never vote for Labour, depite having done so in the past (I was taken in by the con man known as Blair), and despite admiring some of the more decent socialists. There is too much class warfare, and pure envy in that party, it is not healthy. The LIberals are a joke. So that leaves the Tories, but even then there are too many slick sales people, lawyers, English and history graduates, media types and so on, and not enough actual business people and technologists.

Frankly our politicians are all about sleazy politics and facile 'debate', and little to do with actual competence and knowledge of industry, economics and technology. It is depressing. That is why charlatans such as Melanie Phillips and Peter Hitchens are so popular. God save us from such crass and ignorant nincompoops.

First speeding fine - jamie745

Farage is passionate and very blunt but I wouldn't say loony. A few months ago the EU Commission President told us the Euro crisis was all over to rapturous applause by the vast majority of fanatical MEPs all signed up to the project. I'd say they're the real loonies, like the Iraqi General who kept insisting the Americans are losing when you could see the US tanks over his shoulder.

UKIP's had problems, of course it has. In the early days it was a magnet for some very unpleasant people and for most of their history it's been a very unprofessional outfit. Kilroy was a blessing and a problem because although he made UKIP a household name, it wasn't a household name you'd want to pin on your front window. UKIP is only 20 years old, not 300 years old like the Conservatives so you should expect some problems and amateur-hour events, I think they've come a very long way.

You say the only option you have is the Tories, but they're fanatically signed up to all the same things the Labour and Lib Dem parties are too. You heard David Cameron in the Commons the other week clearly say 'I don't want Britain to leave the European Union.' There is extremely little between the Labour and Tory parties these days and frankly if you refuse to vote for someone based on them having unpleasant associations and infighting then how the hell can you vote Tory?

There is no seperating Con from LibLab anymore. A vote for any of those three amounts to the same thing.

First speeding fine - Bromptonaut

Back on thread I'd wager a modest amount that the copper was there becuase speeding is a priority issue for the local citizenry.

The police consult on this stuff. Speeding, anti-social yoof and one other permed from petty crime, public drunkeness, littering and street prostitution or whatever come out as top 3.

I'd have a modicum of sympathy albeit tailored by a hint on improving observation if Jamie was a stranger to the road. If it's on his regular route he thoroughly deserves his 3 points.

First speeding fine - RichardRohn

That awas a bad luck for you.Well to be honest i did not yet have that violation in my 2 years of driving but i experience some bad luck in some private parking control in Finland at (link deleted) where i just charge a huge amount and i can't imagine that i spend money for just an parking my car in private parking space.

Edited by Avant on 14/12/2013 at 00:41

First speeding fine - FP

What is it with this guy?

He wants to link with a site most of us won't understand. What's in it for him?

Bizarre.

First speeding fine - galileo

What is it with this guy?

He wants to link with a site most of us won't understand. What's in it for him?

Bizarre.

I remember watching Finnish rally drivers thrashing Group B cars through forests at 150mph, clear proof of slight insanity. There again, alcohol consumption is popular, as is leaping from saunas into below-zero snow.

Not wishing to stereotype a nationality but Finns have a reputation for being a bit different.