"My understanding is that powder is more effective than foam, which isn't safe on electrical fires".....
The foam extinguisher I refer to is certified to 35 kv @ 1 metre, as are the all foam SPRAY extinguishers.
I've bought an Amerex 9 litre water MIST extinguisher for home which uses ditilled water and is also certified for the same electrical use. The Jewel E Series 6 litre water mist extinguisher is certified for Class F (cooking fat) and electrical fires.
Water - WITH ADDITIVE - extinguishers are also certified tby means of the accepted 35KV electrical conductivity tests.
However the post originated in the form of a vehicle sited extinguisher not an electrical situation.
I think the efficacy of powder versus foam could be argued in terms of the application it's being used for and could agree that powder injected through a small gap in to the engine compartment might smother and starve a fire better than foam - but inside a vehicle with a person trapped and with a fire associated with materials within the interior being alight then I'd favour the ideal of foam rather than risk choking the occupant with the powder.
As I said before, you can't beat the spray/jet from a high pressure hoserel that the FB use when they arrive....it's really trying to second guess the best course of action UNTIL they get there. And I guess either is better than nothing and we can't carry a selection of extinguishers around with us realistically.
I have CO2 at home and is good for confined spaces (provided there's no risk of suffocation) but it's rarely carried on vehicles so isn't especia;lly relevant to this topic and is less effective in the open than indoors. But agree that it's totally clean.
Some of us remember BCF (bromochlorodifluoromethane) and even CTC (carbon tetrachloride) which were excellent at vehicle fires and other confined uses...but were withdrawn as we all know. Co2 being the next best replacement for them.
Edited by KB. on 01/01/2013 at 21:00
|