***Why not just insist that your car is repaired by the main dealer, its your right and the insurance company cannot refuse.***
I understand what you mean. But let me tell you how bad it can be.
The third party insurer was pressing for using their body shop and saying if I go to the main dealer I have to get the hire car myself which could be a hassle. Rubbish as it maybe, the easiest way for me to go to Mazda as they only use approved bodyshop, which I did and I got a hire car without much hassle.
It gets even better. My car was a perfect example of well maintained, low mileage, sought after car bought as Mazda authorized used car an year ago, and I was hoping to keep it for another five years. They wrote off the car and offer me 4200 without any consideration about how much I need to spend to get a similiar car. I rejected the offer and send them the mazda used car webite link with the search parameters. They hiked the offer by 150 pounds which is still way below what I am going to spend. Going by the website prices, I need to spend 6000 pounds to get a similiar car from the dealer.
What they say now is, if I reject the offer they are going to take the hire car back and I have to get a hire car through my insurer. So, now I have to invoke my legal support from my insurer! Again, more money wastage which will eventually passed to the customers. I don't like it, but thats how it works. I could keep silent and get the money they offer, top up the remaining amount from my pocket and get a new car. Is that right considering someone just smashed my parked car? You see the problem.
Edited by JimmyV on 19/11/2012 at 17:43
|