As Thunderbird says you may not be insured at all - as technically you have lied to
In fact you are insured on both and will remain so. An insurer can retrospectively revoke your cover if they can show that the thing you mis-represented is somthing that would have caused them to refuse the insurance had they known about it.
In this case that is not so. They may have charged you a different premium, and thus are able to charge you that increase, but even that may not be significant dpending on what kind of intro discount they may have given normally.
You are certainly under paying though. And normally the existing insurer will refuce to confirm NCD until either their policy is cancelled/expired or you have agreed to a premium without NCD.
In fact the "how many cars in your household" is used for a couple of things; firstly they want to understand who is driving what. So, for example, if you had two experienced 50 yr old drivers, and one 17 year old learners, two new Mercs and a 5 year old Saxo, they they will know that the 17 year old is likely to be the main user of the Saxo and rate accordingly. This is less of an issue with a provisional licence, since they will assuem that one of you is always with the young driver.
The other use for that question is to understand use. If there are more drivers than cars, than each car usage is up from average. If there are less drivers than cars, then milage per vehicle will be down. they will rate accordingly. It will also help them understand how the driving other cars extension may be misused.
Claims from a car not in use, such as vandalism, theft, fire etc. Are trivial when compared to claims from cars in use - personal injury, replacement cars, amuilance chasers etc etc.
|