If the 'friend' was given instructions that he could only use the vehicle on the condition insured it and the owner was given that assurance then when it was used because no Insurance was taken out then the owner did not give permission for the use of the vehicle. In this case there is no offence of permitting the use of a vehicle without Insurance. This was the direction in the case Newbury v Davis [1974].
In relation to speed offences detected by camera it would seem that they are only interested in that offence and do nothing in relation to document check. They have Insurance and Excise details on computor (MIB and DVLA) against vehicle details and a simple quick check could reveal further offences which could be included in the 172/Noip sent out. In the case of Insurance a £200 6 points opportunity lost.(Money Mr Osbourne, money)
dvd
|