Tony
Thanks for your advice - here is what the Motor Codes (trade body negotiator) has to say:
" I wanted the garage to go over the point about why it was not noted at the time of the service that this had happened. The answer was that they would not have known at that time because the crack formed 5 inches inside the spark plug hole. It was only after the car overheated and the car was assessed when it was taken back did they have the benefit of hindsight and were able to diagnose that the crack came from the 4th plug hole. As the neutral third party, I am satisfied with this explanation. The fault would not have been apparent until the car was driven under normal usage.
However, having explained the position they feel more at ease about this and would like to try and help minimise the costs. He has initially offered to half the labour rate, but **** felt it would be better if you two could discuss what options you would have. I am sorry if you were hoping that the garage were at fault and a refund would be on the table, I just don’t think that the garages actions were detrimental to the failure. If you disagree with me you are of course allowed to get a second opinion; I personally don’t think that would be a very cost effective method however."
It seems the trade body has sided with the garage......
So I am now left with the dielemma - should I
1) get them to repair the car and then try to claim the money back in the courts. This would probably cost £1300 more and the car is not worth that.
2) take the hit and scrap the car - presumably I can't go to court if the car is scrapped. I might try to claim back the cost of the original service through the visa debit card I used as I heard you have some rights under this payment.
Cheers
Sweeney
|