Had BMW with DPF for 4 years, no problems so far.
Wifes had Kia for 18 months, same again plus as with BMW problems appear rare. Add to that the 7 year warranty covers the DPF providing the car is serviced etc. etc. thus we are not worrying.
|
The problem is related to car usage, not car brand.
Most of the problems with DPFs arise from usage consisting mainly of short journeys, which doesn't give the DPF long enough to regenerate passively or actively, so becoming blocked.
|
Mercedes have been using the system for donkys years with no problem in the scheme of things not many cars do have problems .
|
|
Isnt 18K in 3 years short journeys?
Last trip was 1000 yards down the road and back because it was snowing.
No issues with the Nissan xtrail 2009 onwards.
I think it would be easier to list cars that are a problem, such as early mazda 6?
|
I, as a non mercedes driver ( hobby "G" wagens excepted) am of the opinion that despite Mercedes much published fall from grace in respect of electronic reliability ( & the wee giltch with the ATF cooling courtsey of Valeo) Mercedes have not had any DMF issues either simply due to rigerous evaluation and proper engineering outweighing penny pinching production savings.
just a thought
I have been particularly impressed at the quality of design & construction in the wee old 1984 "G" wagen, which is also a pleasure to tinker at.
|
|
Isnt 18K in 3 years short journeys?
Maybe, maybe not.
It depends how many consecutive short journeys you do in between longer ones.
My own usage in winter is a pattern of 4 weeks of short journeys totalling about 200 miles and then a long high-speed run for 300 miles on the Sunday - this doesn't cause any problem for the DPF as it gets it's "Italian Tune-Up" regularly.
|
Isnt 18K in 3 years short journeys?
Maybe, maybe not.
It depends how many consecutive short journeys you do in between longer ones.
My own usage in winter is a pattern of 4 weeks of short journeys totalling about 200 miles and then a long high-speed run for 300 miles on the Sunday - this doesn't cause any problem for the DPF as it gets it's "Italian Tune-Up" regularly.
I dont doo italian tune ups, the xtrail engine goes to the red line in first on a regular basis.
Typical driving week, 5 miles to super market mainly A57. 50 mph limit.
3 miles to other super market, 30mph limit.
Once a week A57 wifes keep fit, 6 miles.
6 miles to daughters. 30/40 mph limit
Twice a week fishing, 9 miles.
Very little crawling in traffic, other than when i go fishing, rush hour traffic
7 times a year towing, maximum 2.5 hours, not sure on mileage.
Typical towing 1 hour.
For got to mention caravan parked up for winter Nov to March.
Edited by xtrailman on 29/01/2012 at 16:00
|
I dont doo italian tune ups, the xtrail engine goes to the red line in first on a regular basis.
Then why do you drive a diesel? ;o)
|
I dont doo italian tune ups, the xtrail engine goes to the red line in first on a regular basis.
Then why do you drive a diesel? ;o)
Why not?
Modern diesels rev like petrol cars, hence its quite easy to find the red line with out trying.
|
Modern diesels rev like petrol cars, hence its quite easy to find the red line with out trying.
The Subaru diesel might - but the others don't !!
|
Whatever the maximum cut off speed is (usually somewhere around 5000 RPM) it is completely pointless revving past 4000 because the torque and power and efficiency are falling away rapidly. Diesels just aren't rev friendly-the fuel doesn't burn fast enough.
I still think it is the application that is most important-rather than the type of engine. The xtrail is a heavy car, and the engine has to work harder than if it were in a small car.
It's interesting that BMW haven't expanded their high powered diesel engines beyond 3.0 litres. I suspect DPF concerns were part of the reason.
|
Modern diesels rev like petrol cars, hence its quite easy to find the red line with out trying.
The Subaru diesel might - but the others don't !!
No diesel engine revs like a petrol, the way the different fuels burn makes it impossible and totally pointless anyway. Even the 280 bhp 2 litre that Seat used in the WTCC peaked at 4000 rpm.
|
Yes i was very impressed with the subaru engine, i tested one in 2009, revs just like the xtrail engine.
In comparison i tested the CRV, and found the engine very ordinary, much like my old T30 xtrail, just didnt like revs.
|
|
|
|
Most of the problems with DPFs arise from usage consisting mainly of short journeys, which doesn't give the DPF long enough to regenerate passively or actively, so becoming blocked.
Are some DPF's more robust in this type of environment?
|
|
|
|
I haven't seen many reported DPF issues with diesel BMWs either, but that's just an impression gained from the lack of reports on motoring forums.
(1) I wonder if the manufacturers where there appear to be more failures have customers who are more likley to come on to forums stating their DPF failures.
(2) Are all people who post up about DPF failures giving the full story, it is easy to say the DPF have failed and blame it on the manufacturer but a lot harder to say that they failed to adhere to the instuctions in the handbook, the warning light on the dashboard.
(3) When something is working its is less likley that a person will post up a thread to say so?
|
I would hope that these things are being developed and improved with time. I've read that the DPF fitted to the VAG common-rail diesel engine has a bigger 'reservoir' - if that's the word - for particulates than the old PD had.
My last car was a CR diesel and I never had a problem.
|
My impression is that the DPFs that give the most problems are those associated with the use of EOLYS. This certainly includes all PSA modern diesels SFAIK
|
|
Taken from the VW UK website today
"The latest generation of filters operate without additives. This makes them maintenance-free for an exceptionally long time: an initial inspection is usually carried out only after 150,000 km. The filter's lifespan is dependent on factors such as fuel quality, driving style, use and oil consumption."
I'm looking at a new car, including various VAG products sporting the 1.6TDI engine.
I'd be interested to know what 'quality' fuel is recommended by VAG, together with driving style.
|
Hi, new to this forum but i thought i would add my recent experiences with a golf diesel, 2.0ltr common rail fitted with a dpf. Car is less than 3 yrs old, i have covered in excess of 84,000 miles with it (approx 3,000 miles per month) - ideal conditions for a dpf / diesel? Apparently not, my dpf failed at 64,000 miles - first the filter light came on - i followed the instructions re driving at high revs for x time, then the engine warning light came on so i followed the instructuions in the book and took the vehicle to a main dealer. They tried to regenerate the filter but couldn't (they also replaced the sensor) - then the bomb shell, sorry sirm, you need a new filter and that will be in excess of £2,000! This started alot of discussions with VW, dealer and anyone else i could talk to. Eventully they agreed to replace it but still at £750 (with some good will from VW)! This took over a month with my car off the road.
Since then (this was about 8mths ago) no problems but will i buy another diesel with dpf - very, very doubtful as my driving is ideal for a dpf , engine always warm, a little bit of revs etc. I am now in the process of getting a petrol even though it will cost me more in fuel. If you get a dpf vehicle factor in at least £1,000 for a replacemnt within your vehicle calcs. As an aside, my previous car, a Skoda 1.9TDi (04 plate) is still going strong with my wife at 185,000 miles - no dpf !!!!!
|
Hi, new to this forum but i thought i would add my recent experiences with a golf diesel, 2.0ltr common rail fitted with a dpf. Car is less than 3 yrs old, i have covered in excess of 84,000 miles with it (approx 3,000 miles per month) - ideal conditions for a dpf / diesel? Apparently not, my dpf failed at 64,000 miles - first the filter light came on - i followed the instructions re driving at high revs for x time, then the engine warning light came on so i followed the instructuions in the book and took the vehicle to a main dealer. They tried to regenerate the filter but couldn't (they also replaced the sensor) - then the bomb shell, sorry sirm, you need a new filter and that will be in excess of £2,000! This started alot of discussions with VW, dealer and anyone else i could talk to. Eventully they agreed to replace it but still at £750 (with some good will from VW)! This took over a month with my car off the road.
Since then (this was about 8mths ago) no problems but will i buy another diesel with dpf - very, very doubtful as my driving is ideal for a dpf , engine always warm, a little bit of revs etc. I am now in the process of getting a petrol even though it will cost me more in fuel. If you get a dpf vehicle factor in at least £1,000 for a replacemnt within your vehicle calcs. As an aside, my previous car, a Skoda 1.9TDi (04 plate) is still going strong with my wife at 185,000 miles - no dpf !!!!!
They were having a laught at £2000, just hoped you paid up. Even at £750 they are making a profit, the part is under £500.
You are still well in pocket running a diesel even after this unfortunate expense, check the maths:
84,000 miles in a diesel (2.0 TDI 140) at say 53 mpg (Honest John figure) @ £6.30/gal = £9,985
84,000 miles in a petrol (1.4 TSi) at say 43 mpg (Honest John figure @ £6.05/gal = £11,818.
The difference is £1,833 meaning after your £750 bill you are still £1,083 in pocket and gaining with every mile. Add to that the cheaper road tax of the diesel and you have saved even more.
|
|
|
|
|
|