A guy ran into the back of me and admitted full liability - everything is sorted insurance-wise.
There is now a Vehicle Identification Check VIC marker on my car as it is an economic write-off - I don't know if it's a C or D.
The garage said my car is still structurally sound to drive as-is after the accident. The damage was confined to the tail/boot/hatch door and lock and also the rear spare wheel well is crumpled slightly probably by about 2-3 inches. The garage repaired the hatch door so that I can open and close it easily. Other than a few paint scuffs on the bumper, there is no noticeable dsmage to the bumper as the other guys car went under mine and lifted it up upon collision.
I notice that the process for the VIC is that repairs must be carried out. But I'm told that the car is still sound. Given that repairs to the rear hatch door have been carried out am I compelled to have the wheel well repaired as well if I'm happy to keep the car as it is? The spare wheel still fits comfortably so that might give you more of an idea of the limit of the crumple.
On the other hand, if I must have the wheel well repaired what sort of percentage value of the car might I look at if I sell had the car not been in an accident?
Thank you for reading me and your time to reply. This matter has some urgency for me so if you can reply I will appreciate it very much indeed.
Edited by kevin67h on 24/01/2012 at 22:34
|