I don't think anyone can say for definite which engine will be cheaper to run as that depends on too many factors.
However, I used to own a 2004 Mazda 6 petrol so I can give you my experience. Servicing was cheap (independant garage) as it never had any major problems. Reliability was rock solid, it never let me down once. Economy wasn't very good, I averaged 27-30 MPG in mixed driving, but I do have a heavy right foot. General wear and tear parts like tyres, brake pads etc were no better or worse than any other car I've owned of similar size.
I would definitely recommend checking for rust as this model has a few issues in that area and my car suffered very badly from it. If it didn't I'd probably still own it.
For what it's worth, a common experience for me was telling mechanics I know what car I was driving and seeing a look of concern on their face. Then a look of relief when they found out I was driving the petrol rather than diesel. I'm sure there are plenty of reliable Mazda diesels out there but there are enough dodgy ones to have built up a bad reputation.
I think the new 2.2 is supposed to be much more reliable but personally if going Mazda I would still pick the petrol.
|