Evening all. I just wanted to get the group consensus on the respective reliability of these two engines as fitted to the Focus II and Volvo S40 (amongst other cars).
At 5 years, 80,000 miles, there is little difference in purchase price between the two engine sizes in either model of car, although 2.0 volvos are more numerous than 1.6s, with the opposite trend in Focii. I've driven both engines in various cars and enjoy both experiences. The 1.6 is what I would call "fine" in performance terms, whereas the 2.0 is "plenty"!
From my experience the is little to choose in terms of refinement. Would I be right in thinking that there is a ballpark 10mpg difference between the two engines in every day use?
So basically it comes down to the likelihood of extra-ordinary running costs. I tend to hear more horror stories about the 1.6 than the 2.0. e.g. the sludging up issue - repetitive turbo failures caused by EGRs etc. Both have DMF and DPF but is one generally more troublesome than the other?
Opinions and personal experiences welcomed.......
|