I think motorbikes should be forced to have lights on and wear high vis at all times. Day or night.
Yes alan cars are large but on something like an overcast day, pulling out of somewhere with cars parked at the side of the road, cant see whats coming, everybody in grey cars as they are these days, you can find yourself not knowing somethings there until its too late. If it has lights on you'll see the lights coming, like you do at night.
And people are missing the point, trying to say it wont work when all cars have them, but it will. Because it works at night. Nobody here would say "well every car has lights on at night and as a result we dont see them now" would you?
Its not designed to make cars stand out from each other, its to give them a beacon so you know its there! If, say in five years when it becomes more widespread, some study comes out to say daytime accidents have taken a major decrease then i suppose it will prove it worthwhile.
And as for the argument of cars having these lights makes bikes more invisible, well, Mr Motorbike, feel free to put your lights on also, so as you stand out with a big beacon like the cars do. Motorbikes make up a tiny proportion of traffic yet seem to manage to be involved in about 90% of crashes LOL! So take some responsability, you're riding a death trap to start off with, do everything you can to make yourself seen.
And the "its not good for bikes as they will blend in with other lights and increase accidents" is a non starter. Would you tell a biker to turn their lights off at night? So as they dont blend in with the other lights to make themselves safer?
No, of course not.
"if lights were needed 24/7 then lighthouses would run 24/7" im sorry but thats another strawman argument. The light isnt on the lighthouse for you to see the lighthouse. Its there so as you can see the coast. Which you can see in daylight anyway. You dont need to see the lighthouse in daytime do you? Its not what its for.
By using a lighthouse as an analogy, you are essentially saying there is no need to see a car in the daytime. Which i find alarming, i think you do need to see them.
I think alot of this resistance to the rule (a law which applies to manufactuers, not to drivers, you as a driver dont h ave to do anything. so i dont see why people care about it so much) is because its the EU. And much like in the old days when they wanted to make seat belts compulsory, people plain and simple didnt like it, and would come up with any load of rubbish to justify not wearing one. People would say "oh its much safer to be thrown clear from the car than trapped in!" and rubbish like that, in a desperate attempt to not do as they're told. And this will be the same.
There are places in Europe where its compulsory to have your lights on at all times and carry a spare set with you, and failure to do so results in a harsh penalty, and it seems to work well for them.
Edited by jamie745 on 08/04/2011 at 15:00
|