Only a? tiny fraction of routes are legal? ?a?n?d? ?a?c?c?e?s?s?i?b?l?e for motorised vehicles.? ???G?r?i?n? ?a?n?d? ?b?e?a?r? ?i?t? ?.
|
|
Only a tiny fraction of routes are legal and accessible for motorised vehicles. Grin and bear it.
(Sorry - I have complained again to our developer about this ridiculous fault - I am assured it will be dealt with - Avant)
Edited by Avant on 05/07/2010 at 00:35
|
|
It's true that some of these ancient tracks are 'roads' and even the National Trust cant itself declare them otherwise. But they don't remain tracks of any kind if they are destroyed by recreational 4x4 use.
The Ridgeway for example is now closed to non-essential traffic for the most part though, so it can be done if there is a will in the right places.
www.nationaltrail.co.uk/ridgeway/downloads.asp?Pag...2
Edited by Manatee on 04/07/2010 at 20:32
|
When I had a Land Rover I did a bit of 'green laning' - but only in the summer and treading lightly as far as possible.
Public rights of way fall into 3 categories.
Footpaths - pedestrians only
Bridleways - pedestrians, horse riders and cyclists
Byways - variable but many are open to motor vehicles - these are sometimes known as green lanes.
I'm first and foremost a rambler and cyclist, and I saw the damage that some 4x4 users took pleasure in causing - and trail bikers too. I have to say that horses cause just as much damage on bridleways though.
My advice to 4x4 green laners is to get a mountain bike or a nice pair of walking boots - it's more fun than lumbering along in a Land Rover wondering if you'll get stuck miles from anywhere.
QUOTE from original post:..."" I've tried cycling and running along many local paths through beech and pine woods"" Did you check to see whether the paths you cycled along were ones where you're allowed to cycle?
Edited by Sofa Spud on 04/07/2010 at 22:51
|
Well seeing as how walkers have severely degraded "paths" through National Parks, down to bare rock & eroding badly in places, ho-hum.
Gander/Goose, the sauce for.
|
|
RUPP-Roads used as Public Paths.
|
QUOTE:....""Well seeing as how walkers have severely degraded "paths" through National Parks, down to bare rock & eroding badly in places, ho-hum.
Gander/Goose, the sauce for.""
Not really a comparison. The walkers inflict less damage than horse riders, 4x4 drivers and probably even mountain bikers. It would be a lot worse in these honeypot areas if the paths were open to 4x4s and horse-riders.
I am a bit of a poacher-turned-gamekeeper on green laning, as I said above - been there, got the T-shirt and had the mud on my driveway, but not any more!
Edited by Sofa Spud on 05/07/2010 at 12:59
|
Cept its a numbers game , millions of walkers against thousands ( perhaps hundreds) of 4*4ers. Plus actually the walkers are probably worse for damaging fences and littering and allowing their dogs to chase livestock.
But actually I have a complete dislike to those dorks who think that just because they have bought a 4*4 with ginormous tyres they gotta prove sommat by driving somewhere otherwise inaccessible.
bit like some of the Horsey peoples on our roads
we are all ( apparently) meant to drive at 10mph because they cannot control their steed....bah humbug indeed.
|
There's a historical reason for some doing it:
www.themotorcyclingclub.org.uk/index.htm
|
I used to do a bit of offroading on bikes a few years ago and looked into all this sort of thing.
There were 2 classifications of what would be called a footpath or byway that you can legally drive/ride on
BOAT Byway open to all traffic
RUPP Road used as a public path
An Ordanace Survey landranger map should have these marked on it.
I have to say that it was satisfying to be able to prove to walkers etc that i was legally able to be riding where i was just by showing them the map. Although some still wouldnt believe it!
But then bikers are all evil kitten killers so i guess some people will think the worst of me regardless wont they?
|
Well, its certainly true that when on a nice peaceful country walk, listening to bird song, you don't really want noisy, smelly trail bike whizzing by and kicking up a big cloud of dust in your face. Nor you you want a big 4x4 forcing you off the path so it can get by.
It's not about whether it's legal. It's about consideration for other people, something which seems to be in very short supply these days. The attitude of "I can do this, so I will" is far too common, and exemplified by amj's post.
|
amj - would you like salt and vinegar on that chip of yours?
|
Oooh yes please, are you buying?
And yes it is my "i can so i will attitude" just so i can annoy holier than thou people like you who want the countryside just to themselves.
If its legal to ride or drive along an unmade road and i have proof then why shouldnt i and why should i not take exception when someone wont accept it just because it does fit in with what they find acceptable?
Tollerance and consideration works both ways you know!
|
I thinkyou should practice the last line of your mail.
Horrible noisy smelly wildlife disturbing if you want to really go offroad do what I did and work in africa ,middle east or south america you will soon get fed up of it especially when people are shooting at you. The UK is to small for such antics.
|
So im riding a road legal, taxed and insured bike with helmet,boots,gloves etc on a RUPP or BOAT that the law of the land says i am legally entitled to do so and i should feel bad because someone who happens to be walking along that same byway doesnt like it? Now who is being intolerant and inconsiderate, me going about my lawful business or someone who doesnt like it just because it offends their own set of standards for what they find acceptable?
Secondly, if the aforesaid person where to contact the police or council and complain about this i wonder what the response would be? Would i get a visit and possibly a criminal record for using a fully legal vehicle on a legal byway? I very much doubt it, dont you?
There are literally thousand of miles of public footpaths where neither bikes, cars, mountain bikes or horses can legally go, so if it really is of that much concern then please go and use those paths and accept that there are several different groups of users with access to certain relatively small parts of our small and crowded island and that if you chose to frequent these areas you may well come into contact with them at some point.
|
The bikes on many tracks are not road legal: trailered to site, not silenced, certainly in their unsilenced state illegal on the road. Neither are they ridden with consideration for equally valid users. A pox on them.
|
I'm sorry but this from pyruse: "The attitude of "I can do this, so I will" is far too common, and exemplified by amj's post." is just such total hogwash.
That is not the thought process of someone who is going to go to the bother of preparing such a machine, with all that it entails mechanically and legally. You don't buy a bike, and equipment, become licensed, insure it, tax it, and then think to yourself "where can I go now to annoy the ramblers?"
The way it works is that you develop an interest - which may be contrary to what other people are interested in - and then once you're fit to explore this interest, you go and find places in which to enjoy it.
I suspect that you actually realise this but it's probably too hard a thought to bear, that someone else might want to use the areas that you enjoy in a different manner.
There are hardly any off road areas left now where people can enjoy their machines. The ramblers, it seems, have just about won; as far as they're concerned the countryside belongs to them and no-one else. Consideration for other people seems to be in short supply from their narrow outlook.
|
Extra vingear to match that sour attitude of yours? It's live and let live in my view, but if you do something just to annoy others, that's pretty sad, in my opinion.
|
However from the perspective of the unfortunate private landowner who has the misfortune to have a bridle path / rupp / boat or whatever the designation is running across his or her lands.
Walkers are probably? the most assertive and even agressive users
"I got my rights" to walk over your land etc etc, through your farmyard etc etc
So again.......................... where is the tolereance?
cheers
M
|
This whole thread just goes to highlight the general situation in the British countryside right now. Its all groups and cliques fighting for "their bit" of the landscape. Mountain bikers get annoyed at horse riders for churning up bridleways, horse riders get annoyed at 4x4 drivers, ramblers get annoyed at everyone all the time.
As an ex MTB-er and 4x4-er I have experienced the best and worst of ramblers, sadly in equal measures rather than the best outnumbering the worst. I could go on for ages about how bad some ramblers have been to me but it would just reinforce my point above.
As dieseldogg says, ramblers have more than enough paths to use, so if they have to use a RUPP or BOAT, don't be surprised to find a vehicle on it, ...legally.
|
Yes it is just your opinion Mr Sandwich and being an open and public forum i shall assert my right to have a different opinion and to be as vociferous as i like in making that known!
|
It`s an emotive subject - but let`s try to not let the thread head down the path (or track;-) to personal insults.
Edited by oilrag on 08/07/2010 at 15:07
|
I was very active when in http://www.crag-uk.org/ but the Glos CC saw to it, via NERCA, that we lost almost all of the roads to the Restricted Byway. I left CRAG, painted my V8 RRC camo colours and used to drive the lanes I always did with no plates on it. I used to be a polite, concessionary driver when laning, but the loss of the rights of way turned me bad. If I met some grumpy, stick waving gent on a lane with his wrinkled up wife dressed in knee high red socks, I'd flick them the bird and roost them.
Despicable behaviour, but having had coffee thrown over me, been shouted at and insulted when performing a perfectly legal activity before NERCA, I realised the people that wanted us banned from the lanes were simply not going to be reasoned with. It was not even as though I was churning the lanes up. Most of the damage occurs in winter, and is from farm machinery legitimately using the rights of way. Don't like farmers using the countryside? Then stay at home! Even though my RRC had a 3" lift and 33" MT tyres, there was no way I could drive a lane that had tractor sized ruts in it. So it was obvious to anyone with even a smidge of intelligence that I could not have been causing, or worsening those ruts. Some areas of the lanes were very badly damaged by some vehicles, in thje same way that some National Parks have been denuded by walkers, but is that a reasion to ban us ALL from the lanes? I spent my OWN time repairing a lot of the lanes in groups, supported by the CC. Never once got thanked by walkers for my efforts. Anyone tried the Daneway lane recently? I repaired that with Lord Bathurst and his estate workers.
It conspired to make me sell the RRC. Shame as my daughter no longer got long days out with me and a picnic in a secluded spot. No more night watching of Badgers for us. No more clearing the vegetation to ensure walkers and horses could pass. No more voluntary work to keep drainage working to ensure the lanes stayed open in all weathers. No more rides for my mate who is crippled with Rheumatism, into the wilds of Exmoor and the Quantocks.
Still, at least the Ramblers can be happy in the knowledge that they won, and can now enjoy the place to themselves.
Edited by oilrag on 08/07/2010 at 16:43
|
I run a business in SW France offering off-road motorcycle guided rides.
Oddly enough we meet lots of hikers/ramblers, cyclists and horse riders etc when out on ride-outs on our road legal, fully insured, regularly serviced and properly silenced bikes.
We slow right down and potter past and they stand to one side and we say hello and all is nice and friendly between us.
We've even had little old ladies stopping for a chat and asking for a lift along the trails off us "young men".
Except when the hikers/ramblers are Brits, in which case their faces tend to scrunch up and they wave stuff at us and get all a***y because they travelled all this way to France to walk in peace blah blah blah... It seems, to me, to be a very British rambler thing to hate all other users of trails, even when the usage is perfectly legitimate and legal.
Their complaints nearly always degenerate to the same points as well which is that they're sick of noisy MX bikes being ridden illegally and far too fast, but they're so blinkered that they can't tell the difference between stopping illegal acts and being a whiny ponce about something they just don't "get".
|
well i think most of the biker types i meet are gents
|
So basically what's being said here is "we don't like big nasty smelly motorbikes and 4x4's driving where they have a legal right to and we'll act like utter bawbags to the owners and accuse them of all manner of evils on a par with Charles Manson, Peter Sutcliffe and Robert Mugabe all rolled into one"
If memory serves me correctly there was once another group of people who basically didn't like anyone doing anything, did their best to force their fascist views onto everyone and woe betide anyone who dares to disagree with their views.
We called these people Nazi's
|
I`ve temporarily left examples of posts that i`ve been editing out and hiding. It`s not the usenet at large, gentlemen. This is a family orientated forum and future posts of this nature will be deleted and accounts considered for suspension.
Thanks to all the forum members who entered into reasonable debate.
Thread locked
Edited by oilrag on 09/07/2010 at 08:02
|
|
|
|
|
|