Back in Feb, I was witness to my neighbours car being hit whilst parked in the private car park for our flats.
At the time of the incident the female driver, got out of the car and inspected the damage along with her male passenger and gave me her details on request. At no point was there a dispute that she A- hit the car and B- was responsible for the damage.
Today, I was made aware by my neighbour that the driver is now saying that she did not hit the car and her passenger will back this up, my neighbours car is still not repaired.
She asked me to speak with the driver as I was the witness (not sure if I should have) but I did call her and made her aware that saying she did not hit the car was silly as I was standing right there and saw the impact with my own eyes, she maintains that she did not hit the car, her 'brother' who I assume was the male passenger at the time came on the phone and began in a very rude manner to say that his 'sister' was not liable for the damage as she could not have caused such a dent at the speed she was going, note, he does not deny that she hit the car like she did.
At the time of the incident I did take immediate pictures of the damage that I still have on my phone and also the number plate of the drivers car, which is registered to someone else, my neighbour feels that the driver is not insured to drive the car and by the way she was drinving it seemed evident to me that she was not an experienced driver.
My neighbour said this may go to court and I'll need to be her witness, which Im fine with but is this the normal proceedure and what are my neighbours chances?
|