I've just bought a Honda CR-V (ES diesel auto) after a succession of 5 Volvo V70 estates. Having decided to go for a four wheel drive, I looked at the XC90 and XC60 and decided in favour of the CR-V.
It has several advantages: Honda reliabililty, good value for money, low maintenance cost (5 years for £850!), spacious interior, practicality and very pleasant to drive. The 2010 version feels like a premium car in a way that the earlier CR-Vs don't quite manage. However, it's also thirstier than I would like and the standard M&S tyres aren't quiet. We looked at the CR-V EX - lots of lovely toys but we want practicality and comfort, not luxiness.
The XC60 is cramped inside - not a proper Volvo. The XC90 is just too big and cumbersome, especially for parking. It seems to cost a fortune to maintain. Oddly enough, the smaller CR-V feels more spacious.
On balance, the CR-V ES is spot on for what we want and so far we 're delighted with it.
|