What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
slowing down in the 21st century - bell boy
Reading a piece today where its now the norm to teach people to slow down with the brakes and not to use the gearbox.
Well i have a message for these new world teachers of fashion---
--------how many accidents have you caused with this bad teaching this last week with all the snow we have had had?
If people as pupils of driving schools were taught that in certain situations ie in snow that the gearbox could be their friend then i reckon a lot of claims could have been avoided
slowing down in the 21st century - Rattle
I always use the gears if appropiate it is the way I was taught, e.g I can see hazzards ahead, drop into 3rd, then maybe 2nd if I need to slow down further then stop. I always tend to slow down slowly so it involves changing down anyway.

I ignore a lot of the things I was taught though, e.g I always put it neutral at lights, why would I leave it in first?
slowing down in the 21st century - corax
e.g I always put it in neutral at lights, why would I leave it in first?


Good habit to be in , especially if you're there for some time, it saves the clutch release bearing.

The only thing I would say is that if you slow down using gears at higher speeds, your brake lights aren't coming on, and the person behind has no warning of your actions, although usually one would only slow down using the gears at low speeds where its not such an issue.
slowing down in the 21st century - Robin Reliant
Bellboy,

As a former ADI I can tell you that you mis-understand how the teaching of "Brakes to slow, gears to go" is done (at least when taught properly). Any good instructor will teach a pupil to use the gears to control the speed of the car in slippery conditions or on steep descents. What is not encouraged is the use of crash downshifts, where for example somebody doing 30mph shifts down into second and lets the clutch up abruptly in an attempt to retard progress in the same manner as firmly applying the brakes. I have known older drivers torture their transmissions like this in an attempt to "Save the brakes for an emergency".

Unfortunately, I would be the first to admit that there is an alarming percentage of ADI's who interpret everything in it's literal sense and don't seem to have the wit or common sense to take an intelligent and flexible approach to driving techniques, added to scant mechanical knowledge of what is going on among the oily bits under the bonnet. Combine this with the many drivers who stopped attempting to learn anything more after they passed their tests and you have the reason why peoples driving techniques in hazerdous conditions sometimes leave you gasping in amazement.
slowing down in the 21st century - gordonbennet
this feels like lighting the blue touch paper, but i tend to agree with using the brakes to slow down within reason whilst still believing people should be capable of driving without brakes at all so they can use their judgement!? in bad weather.
Modern braking systems are so powerful and easy and cheap to replace the wearing parts that it makes sense ot let the brakes take the strain.
slowing down in the 21st century - PhilW
GB,
think you are correct in normal circumstances but you may have missed the "with all the snow we have had had?" in OP.
I had a Yaris last week - automatic - and found that using the gearbox (on very snowy/icy lanes in Sussex) which had a 1st and 2nd gear setting was a much safer way of slowing to almost a halt than using the brakes. No slipping and sliding. Was very impressed with the Yaris in the snow (narrow tyres? light weight? lack of power!!?) - much better than the Porsche 997 later in the week!!!
As an aside to main point of this thread - were conditions last week exaggerated by the media? I managed to go (from east Midlands) to Norwich, Sussex, Truro back to Sussex, Kent, across London, and then back to E Midlands without any problems. Must admit that I didn't go down to Truro on Weds when I intended originally because I was told not to - ("conditions too bad" according to guy in Truro). In fact, the lack of traffic was great! Not stuck in any sort of traffic jam all week.
Safe driving
Phil
slowing down in the 21st century - gordonbennet
PW, no i read the OP proper this time i think (unusual i admit)..;)

I agree with you about people learning to control their cars in all conditions and yes in these conditions good gearbox use helps a lot.

Sometimes it doesn't help though, how many here have had old automatic cars that had excess 'creep' on the transmission, i've had cars where you've had to develop the knack of knocking the car into neutral just before you stopped on ice else gentle application of the brakes would be enough to brake the front wheels but the rear wheels still wanted to turn the brakes not applied hard enough for rear drums maybe.

Some modern RWD's manuals on the wrong tyres would possibly start to lock the rear wheels up decelerating in low gear on ice too, something artic drivers are too aware of and often turn off automatic retarders.

EDIT, sounds to me like you managed ok no doubt helped by a good helping of luck, i know i need my share of it.
Not a bad little box that Yaris for an automated manual.

Edited by gordonbennet on 10/01/2010 at 21:51

slowing down in the 21st century - Alby Back
Last one I had like that GB was an automatic Sierra. Pig on snow or ice. It did exactly as you describe, locked the front wheels while sometimes still pushing with the back. Luverly... :-(
slowing down in the 21st century - gordonbennet
automatic Sierra. Pig on snow or
ice.


Hush now Humph, i really liked my ex plod 2 litre Sierra manual.;)

always wanted a 2.8 4x4 but never had the money, didn't want a an XR4i though, like the Capri's nice engine but wouldn't have wanted RWD only on such light cars.
slowing down in the 21st century - Alby Back
One of the nicer Sierras I had was a manual 2.0iS. Sort of poor man's XR4. Looked sporty and had the bucket seats etc. without the running costs. Had a 2.9 Granada 4x4 for a while too. Pleasant but fairly pointless with a thirst like a thirsty thing.
slowing down in the 21st century - PhilW
"you managed ok no doubt helped by a good helping of luck,"

Yep! Almost certainly!
slowing down in the 21st century - gordonbennet
Yep! Almost certainly!


Sorry PW my last post came over badly as if i was suggesting you couldn't manage without luck, apologies for my poor way of putting it.

What i meant was i like you covered a goodly number of miles and luckily managed to not be in the worst place at the wrong time, so i/we had a bit of luck on our side.

I hope that sounds better.;)
slowing down in the 21st century - PhilW
"came over badly as if i was suggesting you couldn't manage without luck,"

Didn't take it that way GB - think I got what you meant! We all need a bit of luck at times! Just glad I wasn't on the A3 on Weds(?) night - which I could have been!
Phil
slowing down in the 21st century - Altea Ego
In snow and ice, using the engine to brake is not the way to do it. Greater control is maintained with feathered throttle and the use of brakes.
slowing down in the 21st century - corax
Robin Reliant

I saw your earlier post about post snow dog-poo (snowy stuff vol3). Really made me laugh. Thanks for that!
slowing down in the 21st century - David Horn
Sorry, I brake as hard or as gently as I consider necessary and then slot it into an appropriate gear for the speed. Hate being in a car with someone who laboriously changes their way all the way from sixth to first, going through each gear with absolutely no reason to.

Icy conditions obviously require a modification of this technique, but remember that it's still possible to end up in a situation with the engine at idle and the wheels still turning but slipping over the ice, which is worse because you have neglibible directional control.
slowing down in the 21st century - Altea Ego
I was taught to drive in 1972. Most driving instructors by then had realised that brakes that worked were the norm, and that gears to go and brakes to slow was the correct way to teach driving.

changing down through the gears to slow the car down is archaic. Slowing it down that way makes it unstable as you are only braking on two wheels.

You use brakes to slow a car down on a descent for example, then the correct gear to keep it at that speed.
slowing down in the 21st century - George Porge
Any 4 x 4 off road drivers care to comment on out of gear muddy descent? Same thing on snow really wouldn't you say?

Edited by Dox on 10/01/2010 at 23:36

slowing down in the 21st century - Altea Ego
tell me how the hill descent control works on Range Rovers?
slowing down in the 21st century - George Porge
tell me how the hill descent control works on Range Rovers?

I don't know, but I'd bet I cant mimic the computerized gadgetry in a fiesta on snow
slowing down in the 21st century - gordonbennet
Any 4 x 4 off road drivers care to comment on out of gear muddy
descent? Same thing on snow really wouldn't you say?


No because you should be driving all 4 wheels in this circumstance and using the engine to brake in the appropriate gear (probably the same as you would climb the hill in, 1st or 2nd low) thereby allowing normal small amount of slip to develop on an odd tyre but a moment later that tyre will regrip and another tyre slip slightly and so on as the descent takes place...the brakes alone under these circumstances will be too brutal and all or nothing not taking into account each individual tyres grip.

Once a lock up happens by braking then all steering control will be lost and the descent end in tears as releasing the brakes will allow the vehicle to gain too much speed before getting engine braking under control again, if the speed is too fast then the gear will be too high and inadequate engine braking result...exactly the same if you had tried to climb in too high a gear.

If you were in a 2 wheel drive vehicle on the same descent you'd use a combination of engine and braking and prayer..;)

I've not explained that terribly well, hope it makes some sense.
slowing down in the 21st century - gordonbennet
I should have added on a muddy descent you have to be careful not be in too low a gear too, otherwise the wheels will turn too slowly should the vehicle start to slide away and you could still lose steering control and end up going down sideways, experience counts..

so they tell me..;)
slowing down in the 21st century - AndyTheGreat
On very slippery stuff my preferred method is to slip it into neutral and use the brakes. This means I have complete control over the level of braking.

Using gears to slow can be very dangerous on snow and ice, you get an initial burst of braking which can easily lock the wheels.

On the subject of learning to drive, how many of you were told to be in the correct gear before entering a bend?

There may be a case for using gears where drivers use the brakes as an ON/OFF switch.
slowing down in the 21st century - dieseldogg
First engage brain, re driving in poor conditions.
Second was it a golfer who said
"the more I practise, the LUCKIER i get"
cheers
M
PS
One actually ENJOYS driving in snow
In the absence of idots who cannot drive, and are therefore worse in snow
This in a 12 year old & therefore disposable FWD
slowing down in the 21st century - movilogo
not to use the gearbox


As more people going automatic way, manual cars will soon be obsolete.

DSG/tiptronic brigade often boast that in future all cars will be equipped with these gearboxes only!

:(
slowing down in the 21st century - midlifecrisis
Information-position-speed-gear-acceleration! (Well..99% of the time) ;)

The System of Car Control consists of 5 features, these being,
* Information - Identify the hazard ahead and check all mirrors to establish your situation
* Position - Where there is benefit, change road position to improve visibility, or to protect your personal space
* Speed - Make necessary changes in speed by use of brakes or deceleration
* Gear - Having now completed all of the above, directly select the gear that will provide the best response
* Acceleration - Apply power to drive the car out of the hazard and into safety

Edited by midlifecrisis on 11/01/2010 at 09:01

slowing down in the 21st century - L'escargot
As more people going automatic way manual cars will soon be obsolete.


Heaven forbid!
slowing down in the 21st century - L'escargot
Changing down has the same effect on the driven wheels as braking. The disadvantage of changing down is that the undriven wheels don't get any braking effect so the braking effect is all done on one axle. Gentle braking is better than changing down. The operative word is gentle.
slowing down in the 21st century - macavity
Jackie Stewart's book Principles of Performance Driving.

Chapter 4
The High Speed Technique.
"On the subject of gear changing techniques, I have always believed that you should take as little out of the car's transmission as possible that obviously means gentle, sympathetic changes when going up through the gears, but also by using the brakes to their maximum when slowing down, often missing gears while changing down through the box. Many people think that racing drivers go all the way down through the gears in a six-speed box like a machine gun. But that means you're taking on a juggling act: steering, operating the pedals, blippingthe throttle and using the gear lever like a madman. I always chose to change down by jumping through gears.
........from sixth to fourth to second. Thet applies to wet or dry conditions, although you need to be careful how you do iy in the wet, perhaps eliminating all the down changes, using the brakes to knock off your speed, and then finally slipping from sixth to first gear right at the end. Remember, you are not going to stop any faster by using the transmission. Brakes are made to stop a car, gears are primarily for acceleration. Deceleration was not part of the gearbox's original purpose: don't abuse it.


Chapter 6
The Road Application.

"Somehow many people think that the better the driver you are, the more gear changes you need to make, both up and down, not to mention changing down as many times as possible when you are braking for a stop sign or a round about. Not so! I'd rather use the brakes first because brake pads are cheaper to replace than gear boxes!

Roll into a corner under braking, even in fourth gear, and put it directly into second gear when the time is right, but not when the car is going to nose down and the rear wheels lock up momentarily while the revs shoot off the clock.

So don't rev the engine violently; change gear early and apply the brakes before down-shift smoothly. The braking comes before the gear changing on the way down, never the other way round. And the brake application again should be smooth and progressive. Before you have even so much as touched the brakes you must consider the way in which you come off the power. Don't come off the throtle pedal abruptly, but ease back on it gently.......
The same should apply when you press the brake. Do it gently and progressively and , before you have finished the braking motion, release the brake again very gently and progressivley, so that you don't feel it coming off.


.....a road car is more softly sprung and greater suspension movement , more roll, more dive and more squat. All the movements are exaggerated compared with a competition car."
slowing down in the 21st century - CraigP
A lot of people say they use the gearbox to slow down, but it's just the clutch friction instead of brakepad friction they're using.

If you're rev matching downshifts (i.e. not using your clutch instead of brake pads) i find engine braking alone isnt worth anything until down to 2nd gear.
slowing down in the 21st century - davmal
The slowing of the vehicle is achieved between the tyre and the surface it runs on. How is what retards the tyre's rotation down going to make a difference?
It's easier and cheaper, generally, to change discs and pads than clutches and gearboxes, and as pointed out, brakes operate on four wheels rather than two as engine braking does on most cars - and ABS is there too.
slowing down in the 21st century - bell boy
You are coming up to a junction in a car and the road you are on is covered in snow and a top coating of slush and probably ice somewhere underneath
Now answer this in a normal bog standard type car front wheel drive or rear wheel drive abs or no abs brake assist or no brake assist
Is it safer to stop at the junction by coming up to it in a gear that takes you there slowly (usually second) or is it safer to brake and dip the clutch, as you would and let the 4 wheels under braking stop you?
My answer by the way is by use of the gearbox.
Non of this trashing up to the junction and banging it down some gears, i mean using common sense and the conditions that prevail to give you complete control over the vehicle you are in rather than frightening the wits out of the driver on the major road as he sees you coming from his left
Reason i posted this by the way was i saw a few near misses last week due to cars flying up to junctions and braking,in fact one did it to me so badly i had to veer sharply to the right into virgin snow quite high as i was afraid he /she was going to hit me.
slowing down in the 21st century - davmal
If you use the gears to slow down, at some point you will have to dip the clutch (in a manual, of course) or stall the car. Using the brakes doesn't mean you have to dip the clutch, the car can overrun in a higher gear whilst braking. Net result is that the wheels slow down, and hopefully car slows down. What rate it slows down is up to the driver and prevailing road conditions, brake hard or brake progressively with four wheels doing the business and brake lights showing, less wear on clutch and gears.
Perhaps in the good old days with no servo assistance and fade prone drum brakes there was an argument for relying on engine braking.
slowing down in the 21st century - CraigP
How is what retards the tyre's rotation down going to make a difference?


Cost. Using your clutch for braking is more expensive than brake pads / discs.
slowing down in the 21st century - SteveLee
Of course there's always the argument that you shouldn't have to brake that hard if you read the road properly and think ahead. I've often completed long motorway journeys without having to touch the brakes at all. Many drivers just alternate between pressing the throttle then pressing the brake! Look ahead and moderate the throttle!

The modern way of driving on the throttle and then stomping on the brake when you want to slow down with no in-between is so incredibly fuel inefficient. Easing off the throttle 20 or 30 yards before you need to touch the brakes takes wear off the brakes, does no harm to the engine and gearbox and saves you fuel as a modern car (particularly a petrol car) in gear with a closed throttle will use no fuel at all, the FI will stop injecting fuel under those conditions.

I'm not advocating using the gearbox to slow down par se, just being in the right gear and using the throttle sensibly. The problem with using the gears to actually slow down on snow and ice is if you get it wrong you will have effectively locked driven wheels with no electronic gizmos to help you out.
slowing down in the 21st century - sandy56
I use the brakes to slow down and then change gear as required.
Most drivers are asleep and you need those bright lights on at the back so they dont run into you.
slowing down in the 21st century - SteveLee
I use the brakes to slow down and then change gear as required.
Most drivers are asleep and you need those bright lights on at the back so
they dont run into you.


It works both ways, if you have some idiot touching their brakes unnecessarily every 5 seconds I guess you'd zone out and ignore the brake lights after a while.

Edited by Dynamic Dave on 11/01/2010 at 21:35