What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
HJ's Braking Distance Challenge - Ben 10
So, had Tex O'Brian actually been convicted of doing 173mph he would have got two years in prison, at the taxpayers expense.

What's the sense in that?

To teach him a lesson and deter others. Thats the point of a custodial sentence. To lock away those that pose a threat and break the rules to such an extent. Because believe me, he wont be deterred by this outcome, in my opinion.
Remember. It probably wasn't the first time he did this, it was the first time he was caught.

Edited by Honestjohn on 24/03/2009 at 06:37

Alleged 173mph speeder - nortones2
The argument that very high speeds do no damage is an absurdity from the motoring loony right, that avoids the underlying issue. Excess speed reduces the capability of the driver to take alternative measures. It is risible to suggest that the police should act only after an injury. Part of their job is to prevent accidents and speed plays a significant part.