I'd like to see the figures but I find it hard to believe that it could cost manufacturers more than about £50 extra to paint a car metallic rather than solid - even with an additional laquer coat on top
|
I agree with the opinion that the manufacturers use metallic finishes as a way to increase the cost of the car and hence their profits.
Over the past few years, we have seen UK cars go from expensive to cheap relative to the rest of Europe and the car makers want to recoup some of their profits. I know, the weak pound will see car prices creeping up.
If you look at the colours available for basic cars on mainland Europe, the range of non-metallics is much greater than here in the UK.
When I bought my Panda recently, I was disappointed that some nice, pastel, non-metallic colours had disappeared from the UK option list.
|
|
You're all assuming that selling price is directly related to manufacturing cost. The selling price will be determined by a whole range of factors, not the least of which is what yearly income the manufacturer requires.
|
As i said - dont worry about it. They make very few cars with flat colours these days, so when you order a car just tell them you dont want a flat colour and you aint paying extra for metalic. They wont argue the point.
|
As i said - dont worry about it. They make very few cars with flat colours these days so when you order a car just tell them you dont want a flat colour and you aint paying extra for metalic. They wont argue the point.
If you ever get a dealer to the bone on a deal they won't include metallic. If they do include it you're not getting the best deal yet. Same with getting flowers or "free gifts" and mats.
|
|
|
|