Your FiL is in just the same position as if he owned the car, but only insured it for TP. He claims from the other driver, who probably will choose to have his ins co handle it. He does not have to, though, and so in the first instance FiL writes to the other driver with his claim, backed up by an estimate.
Unlikely it'll go to SCC, as the other driver should be able to work out whether it's worth his while to lose NCB etc., but the SCC is there if needed.
I was in just this situation 14 months ago - and the other driver quickly put me in touch with his ins co, Zurich, who assessed and paid out in 14 days.
Edited by oldnotbold on 24/01/2009 at 20:37
|
Third Party is what it says on the tin.
Your insurance company has no interest in your vehicle unless the claim is against you the policyholder. That is the only area in which their financial interest lies.
To put it bluntly they don't care whether you get your car repaired or not.
Now if you were full comp they would have to repair the vehicle and claim the money back from the guilty party ( in theory). If they can't they are left to foot the bill, hence their financial interest.
Claim direct against the guilty party, their insurance company may well deal direct with yourself.
|
|
|
I.M.O. >
Property belongs to B-i-L.
Property damaged by driver who shunted car.
Therefore, B-i-L claims from driver who shunted the car and/or his insurance company.
procedure: see www.honestjohn.co.uk/faq/faq.htm?id=126
and www.honestjohn.co.uk/faq/faq.htm?id=33
Edited by jbif on 24/01/2009 at 23:01
|
Thanks all of you for the prompt advice.
|
Same as usual. Doesn't really matter who telephones the third party's insurance company; they will be all set up to deal with the problem - which they will do efficiently and effectively.
|
|
|