What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
Who is to blame here? - TheDub
Hi,
I had my camcorder rigged up in my car and I found myself in this sticky situation with a lorry when coming off the M57:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggANNvHttBA&fmt=18 {link made non clickable, also the language used right at the end *may* offfend some people}

Who is to blame here?
I know that generally if you run into the back of another vehicle then you are to blame, but is that still the case if someone pulls out into a non-existent space in front of you?

Thanks for any replies

Edited by Dynamic Dave on 14/11/2008 at 18:58

Who is to blame here? - Dipstick
That's not far off what happeneed to me, except the bloke in front was a car and I did hit him.

They did me for due care, fine, points.

Who is to blame here? - TheDub
Oh unlucky,
Did they do him for due care too? Or just you?
Who is to blame here? - Dipstick
I don't actually know. I didn't chase it up afterwards. Just wanted it put behind me - it happened at about 65 mph and I felt I was lucky to be still here.

Not that anyone else does, obviously.

Who is to blame here? - Bromptonaut
Probably his fault, looks pretty close but impossible to judge because of the possibilty of the camera settings (ie telephoto) foreshortening the background. You'd left enough space for that sort of thing to happen and had probably lost most of your speed early on on the slip - No camera judder or real impression of emergency braking as he pulled out.


Well done I think.

Edited by Bromptonaut on 14/11/2008 at 14:54

Who is to blame here? - Altea Ego
His fault mostly, but you said you were doing 65 mph? thats a bit quick off a slip road and a possible contributary factor.

It probably wasnt as close as it seems - the lens shortens the view.
Who is to blame here? - Dipstick
The 65 mph was me in my knock, AE , not the OP in his video.
Who is to blame here? - rtj70
Probably his fault in my personal opinion and the gap wasn't really there for a lorry was it. But you dealt with it - like we all have to so often now. In many ways not as bad as some undertaking by cars that slot in to the gap in front.

Was it a RHD or LHD truck - cannot see the plates in the video.
Who is to blame here? - mattbod
Were there any witness statements taken? I would definately pursue through the insurance companies.

Edited by Mattbod on 14/11/2008 at 15:07

Who is to blame here? - mattbod
Sorry posted before I saw the clip but if he had hit me I would have made a big fuss. I cannot abide truck drivers putting lives in danger by just pulling out with no signal like this:just totally reckless. Can any truck driver justify such behaviour espcially as most people will allow a lorry in if they are given plenty of indication and time.

Edited by Mattbod on 14/11/2008 at 15:16

Who is to blame here? - TheDub
Hi everyone, and thanks for the replies,

It was a LHD lorry so it was quite a distance from the lorry driver to his mirror and I doubt he had a RH blindspot mirror fitted (as most foreign trucks dont seem to).

It was the closest call I've had in the last few months of motoring and I was sure I was going to hit him up until he hit his 1st gear powerband.

I was probably doing around 40-45 mph and hadn't braked yet as I thought the lights were about to go green and I could zip straight through.
Who is to blame here? - Optimist
If you're travelling at 45 anticipating a light change some distance ahead so you can "zip through" I think it's going to be your fault if someone pulls out and you hit them.

Who is to blame here? - ForumNeedsModerating
Well, the truck did indicate - if a bit late, just after the car in front passed it. From the distance to the roundabout, the pulling out truck might assume nobody would be going that fast on approach. I wouldn't overtake a standing line of traffic like that quite frankly - it's always likely someone will late lane-change.
From the speed the 'cam-car' catches the car in front, I'd say slip-road exit speed (not saying it was speeding of course, just a bit fast for the circs.) might very well surprise anyone about to manoeuvre.

It must be remembered that we don't own a piece of clear road, or have reserve on it - I would say when reaching the end of a static traffic-light queue, with less than 50metres to lights, a 30 mph approach speed is the maximum safe speed - but maybe it's just my years of motorcycling that taught caution in those situations.

Edited by woodbines on 14/11/2008 at 15:35

Who is to blame here? - TheDub
Some interesting points made there woodbines, all taken on board thanks.

Although (I know its wrong to make any assumptions about the behaviour of other road users but...) people generally dont lane change at this exit too often as the left lane is a filter for the M62 and right lane for all other roundabout exits. Most people go to the M62 from here especially trucks, its quite rare to see an 18 wheeler in the RH lane to be honest.
Also this particular truck wanted to be on the M62 and had to force his way back into the left hand lane within 50 meters of passing the lights.

That said however I will approach closer to 30mph in future.
Who is to blame here? - Lud
My Iraqi buddy was hit the other day on the n/s rear quarter of his wife's newly-acquired booted Golf thingy by a German HGV on a motorway. He said the car started to spin but he managed to contain it. The lorry driver was very apologetic and admitted liability; another witness stopped and also blamed the trucker. My guess is that my buddy was so close the driver couldn't see him at all either in mirrors or through the windscreen.

He says the car doesn't seem to drive quite the same now although the damage, he says, is body only and apparently not severe. He may be imagining a change but I urged him emphatically to have the car looked at before driving it again. He said the insurance was already looking after it and supplying a courtesy vehicle. Slight sense of deja vu here.
Who is to blame here? - Lud
And in answer to the OP: no one needs to be blamed for anything because no crash occurred. Just another of those near-misses that make you grind your teeth for a minute or two, until the next one.
Who is to blame here? - Mike H
Having had a look at your video, I'd say you were going a bit fast down that slip road. Admittedly the truck driver shouldn't have pulled out, but perhaps the gap in front of you was the only one of any size that would enable him to get into the right lane that he needed - we don't know what traffic is behind you.

As someone else said, a narrow escape, and hopefully a lesson learned.
Who is to blame here? - oldnotbold
Coming down a slip-road it's be expected that traffic might do a late lane-change. What you experienced is nothing odd, I'd say, even if it's poor driving.
Who is to blame here? - b308
I'm with some of the others here... proceeding down a slip road which ends in a set of traffic lights at 65mph is asking for trouble... whilst the lorry should not have pulled out I suspect that if an accident had occured your speed would have been deemed excessive for the circumstances...
Who is to blame here? - Dipstick
Cor blimey, TheDUB, folk don't read, do they!

:)

Who is to blame here? - rtj70
The OP says he was doing around 45mph not 65mph. But approaching a traffic signal at that speed to assume it might be change was perhaps wrong and he has learned that lesson.

What this proves is we all need to be defensive in our driving technique these days to avoid problems not of our doing.
Who is to blame here? - jbif
Who is to blame here?


IMO - It looks like both you and the truck driver were approaching the roundabout quite fast. In fact, it looks like the truck changed lanes to avoid running in to the back of the much, much, slower traffic in lane 1.

Edited by jbif on 14/11/2008 at 16:39

Who is to blame here? - TheDub
Interesting take on things, jbif. I hadn't thought of that. I'll take a look at my original footage on the big telly later to see if I can see it a bit better.
Who is to blame here? - jbif
Interesting take on things, jbif.


Having looked at it frame by frame, it definitely looks like the truck was just not going to be able to avoid the queueing traffic in lane 1, and moved across to lane 2 where there was more room to slow down.

Who is to blame here? - Bill Payer
looks like the truck was just not going to be able to avoid the queueing traffic in lane 1


That was certainly my view when I looked at the video.

Also the sliproad looks as though it bends left so the OP doesn't have a view beyond the lorry which would make me hesitant about trying to pass it at speed. The fact that its foreign is also another huge caution, but with the best will in the world, you don't always take that in.
Who is to blame here? - smokie
24 inches here, not sure size really makes any difference though...jbif is possibly right, but the lorry shouldn't have been taken by surprise by the stationery traffic.

For me, it's just one of those things. Shrug and move on. My Mrs, when she was commuting up the M4 for work, would always come home telling me about her near misses. Looking genuinely interested became hard to do after a while.

I'm curious why you film yourself driving, and what else you film yourself doing! (no, ignore the second half of that...)
Who is to blame here? - Lud
The OP was just getting a decent move on. The truck driver was careless and boorish.

Pay no attention to people tutting at you for going briskly DUB.

I bet you'll be just a shade more circumspect on that particular slip road next time though...
Who is to blame here? - NowWheels
IMO - It looks like both you and the truck driver were approaching the roundabout
quite fast. In fact it looks like the truck changed lanes to avoid running in
to the back of the much much slower traffic in lane 1.


I agree with jbif. The lorry was undoubtedly wrong to pull out without indicating, but you were both approaching the roundabout much too fast, and you should have been aware that some of the traffic in the inside lane would want to change lanes for the roundabout. The video shows that you quite a high speed differential over the truck, which is a very bad idea on a roundabout approach.

Rather than asking who is to blame, I'd be asking why neither of you was driving in the defensive style which would ensure that you got home safely.
Who is to blame here? - rtj70
If the others are right and the lorry had to do that you were lucky you were far enough back. Things could have been worse. But they were not thankfully.

Maybe a lesson for all of us - never assume other drivers do anything as expected and assume they will not. My driving instructor on my motorway lesson taught me to observe (and recall) all other cars - if you cannot see it anymore do not assume it's gone it's probably in your blind spot.

The M6 this Tuesday between j14 and j17 was as silly as ever so I came off at j17 and used the A roads. Somehow an accident around j10 had a lorry with a car across it's front at 90 degrees tipped up as the lorry hit it side on. Lorry was pointing straight ahead but the Punto was sideways across the front of the HGV. And all this just after the traffic started flowing after getting passed the M5/M6 interchange.

I hate some of the UK motorways now and definately will never drive near Milan ever again. I still have the X-Rays and CT scans I had taken after our accident :-(
Who is to blame here? - Lud
What is all this tutting at the OP for going too fast? It's a load of cobblers.

He wasn't going too fast or he would have hit the truck or had to scrape by between it and the reservation or whatever. That didn't happen. He managed to slow down and stop without what I would call anything resembling drama: squealing rubber, getting out of shape on some gravel, cries of alarm. Nothing like that. Just someone reacting correctly to one of the things that happen when you drive about.
Who is to blame here? - Fullchat
Whilst driving one has to consider three things:

What can be seen.
What cant be seen.
What could reasonably be expected to happen.

(Comes from Roadcraft with regard to approaching bends but still applies to other facets of driving).

I would make the following observation. Could it reasonably expected that a vehicle on a slip road, perhaps in a strange area, to make a change of lane? I would suggest that the answer to that would be that there is a strong possibility.

Another observation that cold be made in the driving plan is that the lorry could have had foreign plates indicating LHD. In which case overtaking manouvers are potentially even more hazerdous

Bearing that in mind then I feel that the original poster should have reduced their speed much earlier as they approached the potential hazard and matched their speed.

Having said that in this instance had the poster been travelling slower but been alongside the lorry he may have still been wiped out.

A good observation re the lorry driver having to take avoiding action to avoid hitting a car infront. They may well have realised their mistake and after a quick mirror check made a decision that a move into an offside gap was achievable - just! The lesser of two evils. However that gap closed down very quickly due to the speed of the approaching vehicle.

Anyway all ended well and perhaps something to be learned.
Who is to blame here? - Lygonos
Lorry was going too fast as the cars in his lane were actually stopped. The lorry has zero chance of not rearending those cars without changing lanes. The OP's lane is clear, and as such his speed is not an issue as he won't run into anything on his lane.

However, as has been mentioned, the OP also should be driving defensively here, as he cannot see anything ahead of the lorry in the left-hand lane and should be ready for just such an evasion from the lorry.

Any "fault" is the lorry's, but just because you are in the 'right' doesn't make it any better if you get hit by an 18-wheeler.
Who is to blame here? - R75
I think you would have to accept at least 50% of the blame, possibly more!!!

I could not tell if the truck was indicating or not, but basically he had completed his manoeuvre before you reached him, your anticipation of his actions was sadly lacking.

From the trucks POV, he checked his offside mirror, there was a large gap between the car overtaking him and you, he looks forward, checks mirror again and the overtaking car has passed, he still sees you a fair way off in the distance so starts his lane change, checks mirror again and you are right on his back end. I think he could quite rightly assume that coming off of the motorway up to a junction that cars would be exercising caution and slowing down, which was not something you were doing, you did not seem to slow until the truck changed lanes. Approaching traffic at the speed you did is an accident waiting to happen. I hope I am never in front of you!
Who is to blame here? - Lud
Would anyone here care to explain to me, after looking at the OP's video, just what their reason is for thinking his speed genuinely excessive, rather than a bit press-on but well contained?

He slowed and stopped absolutely without drama.

There was no contact or even anything that looked as if it might end in contact. No tyre squeal, no evasive steering movement, not even a really close approach to the lorry which had come out a bit suddenly (although certainly not in the abrupt, violent manner of a lorry bearing down at unstoppable speed on a line of stationary cars, just late and rudely it seemed to me). But never mind that. The OP didn't hit the lorry or look as if he was going to. He stopped in an unflustered and dignified manner, perhaps feeling mildly annoyed as you would.

I can't stand all this po-faced carp. I must be getting old.

Edited by Lud on 14/11/2008 at 22:43

Who is to blame here? - Bilboman
There are so many factors at play that even with an eagle-eyed, overhead, infra-red, X-ray 3D view of everything, it's impossible to get the whole picture! Sadly, it's in situations like this that one tiny slip ends up in a multiple pile up, and being "in the right" is scant consolation when the crunch comes!
Things to think about:
Foreign lorry (question: why not provide enormous fluorescent "LHD" stickers fto plaster on rear of HGVs at port of entry; likewise for RHD lorries crossing the channel)
Momentum of 40 ton lorry as opposed to a 1 ton car: in extremis, the lorry is obviously going to change lanes rather than try to stop dead. i.e. always assume a lorry is about to do just that and leave room accordingly. As a previous post pointed out, what exactly was right in front of the lorry at that moment (and what speed was it doing?) No, I couldn't tell, either!!
Forget the courteous "after you!" or "thank you" flash - this really only happens in Britain: on the continent it is much more common to "go for it":driver wants to move - driver moves. A headlamp flash on the continent means "I'm coming through!" but there is no equivalent sign in Britain. At least, not one that everyone recognises. A continental lorry driver is not used to the idea of mirror-signal - wait for it - courteous "after you" from the driver behind - pulls out: If Janos needs to change lanes he will change lanes and that's that!
Who is to blame here? - NowWheels
I hope I am never in front of you!


Are you sure that the tone of that comment is going to be helpful?

The OP did something which I have never seen before on the backroom: he posted a video of his own driving and asked for comments. That's quite a brave thing to do, exposing himself to that sort of scrutiny, and I think it's only fair to assume that he asked in good faith for a friendly assessment, hoping to learn from the responses. It seems only fair that responses should show the same good faith, assuming that he is genuinely looking for any room for improvement in his technique.

Some of the responses say he did fine, while others (including mine) say he would be better to drive more defensively. I hope he'll take all the responses on board ... but if some of the responses seem snippy, I don't think that it's going to encourage him to ask again. I happen to agree with your assessment, but I think that the phrasing may come across as a bit harsher than would be helpful.
Who is to blame here? - Optimist
I could easily be going po-faced but I still think that if you shoot down the outside of a line of standing or slow moving traffic towards a junction, you may find yourself having to deal with one of those things that happens in a line of traffic like someone deciding to change lanes.

Since OP seems to know the road and junction well and was confident traffic in n/s lane would stay there, I'm not sure how he was going to benefit from his speed since there would be little or no traffic in front of him at the light anyway.

Also: why was OP filming his journey?


Who is to blame here? - NowWheels
Also: why was OP filming his journey?


Because he's a spy. But don't say that I told you ;-)
Who is to blame here? - jbif
.. when coming off the M57:

TheDub: can you be specific about the junction? It looks like you were heading South on the M57?
Also: why was OP filming his journey?

Optimist: It looks like TheDub likes to film action from the car!
Watch:
uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Pk2ASniGgtw&feature=channel
uk.youtube.com/watch?v=LgpHyyR6Q3g&feature=channel

{Links made non-clickable, Rob}

Edited by rtj70 on 15/11/2008 at 00:00

Who is to blame here? - jbif
{Links made non-clickable, Rob}


Eh? Why so?
www.honestjohn.co.uk/forum/post/index.htm?f=2&t=33...4

"Posting of video clips
Clickable links to video clips may be posted, but please use your common sense.

If the clip redirects to a site where the content also contains adult related, or other material that could be deemed offensive, then PLEASE use your discretion and make the clip non clickable and include a disclaimer in your post informing so. "

Who is to blame here? - rtj70
jbif, I had my reasons and err'd on the side of caution - learning still. If I was wrong I will sort it.
Who is to blame here? - jbif
jbif I had my reasons and err'd on the side of caution - learning still. If I was wrong I will sort it.


rtj70:
Quite OK by me, I was asking just to make sure I had not misunderstood the site rules. I know it used to be the rule in the past that clickable video links were forbidden, full stop.
;-) Having to apply common sense makes it difficult! :-(

Who is to blame here? - R75
>> I hope I am never in front of you!
Are you sure that the tone of that comment is going to be helpful?


Yep, quite sure. The OP was going at quite a pace, had I been in a car in front of him waiting at the junction I would be really wondering whether the OP was actually intending to stop/slow down in time! I would be looking for a way out at that point, working on the assumption that he was not going to stop in time.

He may well know what he is doing, great, good for him, driving is also about letting others know what you are doing, approaching junctions at speed is not good practice, any number of things can happen, and in this case did.

I would have anticipated the truck doing something like he did had I been in the OP shoes, the OP was driving on the assumption that everyone knew what he was going to do, and that everything around him was going to remain in the status quo, it didn't, driving by its very nature is dynamic, the OP seems to have failed to realise this imho.
Who is to blame here? - R75
Edit:

Looking at the other 2 videos that jbif posted that are by the OP I feel even more happy with my remarks. Both the videos are shot in the wet, and at night, if you look at the rev counter and the speedo needle it would suggest that the car is going far in excess on the speed limit for the road in normal conditions, let alone the dark and wet. I am no motoring prude, far from it, but I do take a bit of exception at boy racers, which it seems very much like the OP is (imho).

he asked for feedback on his video, I gave it, part of that feedback is about the standard of his driving, which to my mind is very poor.
Who is to blame here? - smokie
I'd hope you are never in front of me R75 Spending too much time looking in your mirrors at what's happening behind you than looking what's in front... :-)

I don't believe his speed was *that* great, brisk but not reckless. He's already said that he consciously kept his speed up in anticipation of the lights changing - presumably if there had been a car sat there he wouldn't have been going quite so quick.

In the scheme of things, this is not a Big Deal. Just one of those things. I wouldn't have even remembered it had happened, if it happened to me, let alone bothered the collective brains of the backroom by posting about it.

Who is to blame here? - R75
I'd hope you are never in front of me R75 Spending too much time looking
in your mirrors at what's happening behind you than looking what's in front... :-)


I make no apologies for knowing what is going on all around me, and that means using my mirrors and also turning my head. On more then one occasion in my driving career I have managed to avoid being rear ended by seeing that the car behind was not going to stop in time and also by leaving myself enough room in front that I was able to turn into the lane next to me which has given the car behind an extra car length to stop in. It's called being aware!! ;o)
I don't believe his speed was *that* great brisk but not reckless. He's already said
that he consciously kept his speed up in anticipation of the lights changing - presumably
if there had been a car sat there he wouldn't have been going quite so
quick.

It's not the speed, it's inappropriate speed, and coming into a blind junction like that justs seems like asking for trouble.
In the scheme of things this is not a Big Deal. Just one of those
things. I wouldn't have even remembered it had happened if it happened to me let
alone bothered the collective brains of the backroom by posting about it.


I agree, but the OP seems to think it is!
Who is to blame here? - jbif
I make no apologies for knowing what is going on all around me, and ... given the car behind an extra car length to stop in. It's called being aware!! ;o)



Ditto.

Who is to blame here? - gordonbennet
Its a good reminder to all of us to be extra careful when approaching a truck, especially foreign ones, they do drive differently to our own chaps and girls who arn't perfect by a long chalk. Some of them will just choose a space and go for it.

Another couple of little things to look out for on motorways when there are many HGV's about, my own opinion of many years on the job.

If the trailer has no rear number plate assume the driver is equally conscientious of their driving practices, some don't fit the rear plate so they don't get caught by the camera's, so worth keeping an extra eye on.

Also if the HGV driver is wearing a hi vis whilst actually driving assume the worst and plan for any eventuality, i have no idea why but chaps that do wear them continually are very likely to do the daftest things.

And a truck with clean mirrors and windows is more likely to have a responsible and careful driver at the helm.
Who is to blame here? - R75
Also if the HGV driver is wearing a hi vis whilst actually driving assume the
worst and plan for any eventuality i have no idea why but chaps that do
wear them continually are very likely to do the daftest things.


Hmm, must remember to take mine off then when I drive a truck, was not aware it effected my driving style!!!! ;o)

And a truck with clean mirrors and windows is more likely to have a responsible
and careful driver at the helm.


Ahh, that's ok then, seems like one cancels out the other, so I can leave the hi viz on and remain average!
Who is to blame here? - tobyjug
I think the remark made by the driver at the end of the video sums him up pretty well, Aroggant.
Never makes a mistake, always someone elses fault. Gods gift to drivers.
Heaven help us when there are people like that on our roads.
Who is to blame here? - uk_in_usa
Here's a great video on a similar theme

www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCG4sieuUsE

Artic crosses 3 lanes into the path of a cop car doing 120MPH

Who is to blame here? - stan10
Looks like he misjudged your speed, not sure that i would apportion blame, this sort of thing happens all the time, and at ALL speeds, but it seems that as the "assertive" driver, you dealt with the situation completely. You were obviously awake, problems happen when people take things for granted. ... Always expect the unexpected !
Who is to blame here? - rtj70
"Always expect the unexpected "

That is part of defensive driving. Always assume all drivers will do what you do not want them to do.

Edited by rtj70 on 17/11/2008 at 01:05