What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - oilrag
Delving again into the Historical record ;)

Does anyone remember the low viscosity oils that were promoted in the (I think) early 70s as a fuel saving measure?

I can remember an allegedly 25,000 change interval for one synthetic at that time, but there were others, lower viscosity at the upper as well as `W` end of the scale.

Point of interest to me is the cars of the era would have had their rings and plain bearings set for a thicker oil.

Did you ever try these oils out and what was the result?

Edited by oilrag on 04/07/2008 at 08:57

Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - gordonbennet
I think i went with the 15/40 as it became available OR, simply to get a thinner oil for cold starts. I never did like 20/50, trying to pour it on a cold day gave an indication of the difficulty an engine would have in circulating it. Having said that, i know people who used the big D with regular and frequent oil changes and had astonishing mileages from their engines, but they were high mileage vehicles anyway with hundreds of miles between cold starts, so the oil at its thickest was minimal.
Wouldn't dream of leaving an oil change longer than 5000 miles on a car i own anyway, and can't see that view changing, supposing we have a choice in the future.

I remember a chance meeting with a chap who worked for a very high profile oil company back in the 70's.
It was around the time that Leyland or whatever they were called that day had released the montego with some unheard of oil change interval of 12K or something.
I asked him if the oil would last that long, and the reply indicated to me that i would do well to change oil at 5K at the latest as it deteriorates rapidly after that.
That was good enough for me.
Its an old fashioned view, but luckily there's no law to stop a person having a view...yet, even if all the modern views are wrong..;)

Regards..
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - Number_Cruncher
>>the reply indicated to me

GB, he worked for an oil company - he would say that, wouldn't he!

Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - prm72
Changing at 5000 mls back in the 70's, 80's etc was a fine idea, but not nowadays with fully synthetics, i've extended mine to 10000
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - oilrag

As perhaps already mentioned.
I had a Maestro Clubman D, which I did 130,000 in 6 years on in the early 90`s.

That had a 12,000 interval. Anyway, as you know I always service my own and with this one right through the warranty too.

I did a 1,000 change then at half manufacturers interval for the rest of its life.

It went in to the dealer for the cambelt at 60,000 and the garage asked me why the engine was so quiet, regarding mechanical noise. Knowing nods when i told them of the change interval... Also i ran it on a diesel specific oil (Esso to D5) better than the book spec.

Of course as someone will no doubt say, I wasted my time in the end ;)

Now its Mobil one of course at half the interval.

Back to the 70`s though and thin oils. Do you remember the first 10w40`s and I think even thinner than that?
Colour seemed to be part of it then too. Duckhams seemed to have a grip on `green` and something else was almost purple..

I did service the family cars with those mono grade rip-strip round cans back in around 1964, but I think multigrades were coming in then.

Last used a mono grade SAE 30 oil in a triumph twin in the summer of 67, in the hope that this would stay in viscosity better than a new-fangled multigrade at speed ;)

Regards

Edited by oilrag on 04/07/2008 at 12:12

Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - gordonbennet
GB he worked for an oil company - he would say that wouldn't he!


I don't quite follow NC.

He could have said their oils were the best thing since Y fronts and therefore i should buy the latest wonder oil, but what he meant i suppose was buy the normal quality oil and change fequently.

Both would have the same result, normal oil costs about half or did then and would supposedly last half the time.

Oilrag, funnily enough the arguments about will continue for ever.
My toyo dealer suggests not to use the 10/30 in the pick up as recommended as they say its too thin, and to use toyo standard 10/40....can't win.

Edited by gordonbennet on 04/07/2008 at 15:57

Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - nortones2
And in the USA, with the same engine they would use 0W/20 oil (of a certain quality, I assume) as standard, with no option given to use different viscosity's:)
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - gordonbennet
And in the USA with the same engine they would use 0W/20 oil


Do they have many 3.0 td's out there Nortones, i'd have thought they would have been the petrol engines mainly.

Don't think i've ever seen a can of 0/20 oil, if it was cheap enough you could probably put it in the tank.;)
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - nortones2
Mainly, perhaps, but I thought there were diesels about. Free from CARB etc if they are classified as trucks. Might be wrong.....
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - oilrag
"buy the normal quality oil and change fequently."

That`s exactly what I did when Mobil came out with the seemingly 25,000 oil change interval for their synthetic oil in the early 70`s, GB.

Wonder what happened to that? four times the average 6,000 interval of the day.
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - Screwloose
oilrag

You're thinking of BP's Visco 7 10W-30? I recall it was introduced in the mid-70s and it never caught on; too dear and the cars drank it. I can recall putting 7 pints a day of Shell EX30 [similar stuff] into a six-pot recovery Land-Rover.

The only other common variant to the all-conquering 20W-50 was Esso's Uniflo; which was a 10W-50 I think.

Mobil's first fully-synth was something like a 5W-50 - and had about 0.0001% of the market. They went strangely quiet about the longer service life; maybe the filters of the time weren't up to it.

Ricardos did some tests on 36,000 mile changes and it seemed to last OK - strange changing filters at 6,000, but not the oil....
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - oilrag
" BP's Visco 7 10W-30?"

That`s the one Screwloose, thanks. I always wondered how the ring packs and bearing clearances in the cars of the day, handled that.

Also whether there is a current comparison.
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - Screwloose

Oddly enough; current 10W-30s in old classic cars seem to work OK. Maybe it's a different intensity of usage, or better anti-burn additives; but my personal view is that it's less carbon build-up allowing the rings etc. to work better - the biggest single improvement in oils of all time was API/SG in the late 80s.
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - oilrag
Screwloose, Are you seeing any engine wear on cars that have been serviced according to the book?
I`m changing Mobil 1 0w40 out at 6,000 miles, rather than Fiats 12,000 miles. It seems they have now gone to 18,000 miles on 5w30 oil. It seems same as Vauxhall with their version of the 1.3 Multijet..

Always grew up with halving the interval, but do wonder sometimes,.

Edited by oilrag on 04/07/2008 at 17:08

Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - stokie
I remember the ad, it showed a Mk3 Cortina with a chap filling the engine with this oil, and (I think) the same chap filling the tank with petrol, the ad line went something like "Filling up with this (the oil) here can save money filling up here".
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - Screwloose

On cars that have sensible oil changes with quality oil there is now NO visible engine wear - regardless of mileage.

Back in the days we are discussing; once a car was past 50,000 there was a "fingernail" ridge in the top of the bore and a 100,000 mile car was something special. [And well knackered.] Cords "ridge-dodger" Dykes rings were readily available to cope with oval, barrel-shaped bores and the inevitable smoke trail...

I'm still of the opinion that it's 6,000 for a premium mineral and 8-10,000 max for a good semi-synth. Fully synth is required for turbo petrols because of the turbo shaft temp, with a 12,000 max period.

For low-mileage cars an annual change is needed - except for Sunday classics.
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - oilrag
Interesting Screwloose Thanks.

you mention the biggest improvement of all time being API SG. was that the sludge issue? if so was that happening within recommended oil change intervals at the time?
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - Screwloose
oilrag

Yes; for me, that was the big step. Before SG, everything inside an engine was coated with a sticky, black, sludge. [Particularly if GTX was used.] With SG oil, it was spotless - regardless of mileage.

Using HD30 in petrol cars used to keep them a bit cleaner; but SG certainly made the biggest, visable, difference.

It meant the end of "Black Death" carbon-choking too; that was a regular engine-killer in the 70s and early 80's.
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - jbif
Just two of many testimonials there:

www.amsoil.com/testimonials/409000.aspx
" 409,000-Mile Oil Drain Interval Mack Engine Teardown .... "

www.amsoil.com/testimonials/chalkley.aspx
"The Passat now has over 278,000 miles on it and its still running the same gear lube. Chalkley changes his motor oil in the Passat at 50,000 mile drain intervals. Theres no by-pass kit on it either, he said, and Ive never had a problem. Not a one. "

Edited by jbif on 04/07/2008 at 18:10

Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - bathtub tom
Oilrag said:
I had a Maestro Clubman D

So did I. I even changed the gearbox oil at about 40K
The floor rotted out!
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - oilrag
I hated that Maestro Box Tom.

Gearbox change interval was 24,000 on `engine oil`and I was doing around 28,000 a year at the time. I seem to remember a wheel had to come off and some under arch trim to get at it.


`engine oil`in the gearbox.... I think I did that 6 times, while the polo C of the old Man`s was on proper gear oil with no change and gearbox as good as new at 17yrs and 110,000 on the original oil.

Edited by oilrag on 04/07/2008 at 20:05

Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - oilrag
Thanks, Screwloose, I think it`s the memory of the sludge era that makes it so difficult to use the regular interval now ;)

Searching the the web, it just seems to be America now?

tinyurl.com/6fw3jn

I only saw this once, in an early 1960`s Bedford van. I don`t know how that survived as it only ever received top ups (yes family) for years, before I took things in hand with the spanners aged 14.

Edited by oilrag on 04/07/2008 at 20:24

Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - Screwloose
oilrag

I've seen that mess before inside ex-US engines; paraffin wax residue. Some oil sold in the US is simply shocking - wouldn't last five minutes in a high-stressed Euro car.

Even with 5,000 mile oil changes, the US rubbish-oil issue caught VAG out on the 20-valve 1.8T - tens of thousands of blown engines from sludge-blocked pick-ups nearly bankrupted them and yet, over here, no real problem.
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - gordonbennet
Thanks Screwloose I think it`s the memory of the sludge era that makes it so
difficult to use the regular interval now ;)


Before we all wave bye bye to black sludge, my indy showed me the results he found in 2 V12's of late 90's vintage, it looked very like what you'd find in a mk3 escort.
Maybe the customers who paid nearly 100K apiece for those cars when new would have liked a poke nose.
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - bathtub tom
>>I hated that Maestro Box Tom.

I found it pretty relaxing. I learned to drive at 10MPH below the national speed limit because it didn't have enough go to overtake what was in front until they fell 20MPH below the national speed limit. See stunorthants26 The right to drive more slowly? thread. It also did 60 MPG!

IIRC the gearbox was VW sourced, to take the torque.
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - Lud
once a car was past 50 000 there
was a "fingernail" ridge in the top of the bore and a 100 000 mile
car was something special. [And well knackered.]


And when you let a second-hand car rev closer to its red line than it was used to you could break the top ring against that ridge*, ouch! or (more usually) curtains...

Are you saying Screwloose that modern cars whose oil is changed fairly regularly don't get the ridge? Am I taking care of my car's engine for nothing? :o}

*Owing to stretch in the conrod around tdc at very high rpm or breakdown of the oil film in the big and small-end bearings, itself not a very good thing to happen...
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - Screwloose
Lud

Yes; for most normal-use cars, the ridge has gone - on many, you can still see the honing marks on the bores up to 100K+.

Feel free to explore the upper reaches of the rev-counter....
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - Lud
I think mine's done more like 150K though...

No, it's a bit long in the tooth for too much of that stuff... I'll wait till there's another in the offing anyway.

:o}
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - Dog
You're not gonna believe this but ... I did the tappets on a Simca 1301 once, and when I removed the rocker cover there was no oil there just mega-thick black sludge.
The valve clearances were so huge I could get the whole feeler gauge in there.
Car ran sweet once I'd tuned it.
I remember 2 particular customers I had who never, ever, not never changed their oil,
One had the Ford V6 in a long wheelbase tranny and the other had a Volvo 240, the Tranny went well over the 100 thou ok.
I had a Toyota Hiace back in the the 80's and I stuck in some Mobile 1 ... I couldn't believe the clatter from the timing chain next morning so I replaced it with GTX and flogged the Mobile to my m8 : )
I've always changed my oil every 6 thou - whatever it says on the can, especially as I have an Almera 1.8 and ... I might even look at the Mobile 1 again.
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - none
Back in the late 60's one of my duties as an apprentice was checking oil levels on the TK Bedford range. In cold weather topping up was done by heaped spoonfuls.
Changing Diff oil meant warming the toffee like new oil until it would flow. It's all so easy these days - just read the instructions on the tin.
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - Screwloose
meant warming the toffee like new oil until it would flow.


Ahh; EP-90/140, what fun that was to coax out of it's tin in a freezing workshop.
Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - Number_Cruncher
Easy, we just kept the 140 barrel fairly close to the salamander.

Cue be-hankied Yorkshiremen saying "Salamander?... Luxury!"



Low viscosity oils, older cars, fuel saving 1970`s - none
EP140 is still used in the oil filled front wheel bearings of the Iveco 7.5t range.
Painfully slow to refill after any work that entails draining.