What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - bostin
Over the last couple of years there have been a handful of occassions when I have considered it necessary to get somewhere asap. The last two occassions being my daughter being born last summer & last week a dash from work to hospital following said daughter practising her diving skills onto the kitchen floor! Two questions arise from this:
1) Is there ANY leniency from the law if you get pulled over for exceeding posted limits in such situations?
2) Do the backroomers think there is any realistic way that people driving in a genuine emergency situation could communicate their 'need' to other road users? A flashing light for instance? Last week was particularly concerning as I was unsure whether daughter would make it at the time(she did) and was stuck in barely moving traffic around for Salisbury for what seemed like hours. To be able to let other road users know that I was in a genuine situation 'could' have enabled me to get to the hospital sooner.

As a side note, I also wonder whether at other times those people that are driving at v. high speed (i.e. 100mph +) past me are also genuinely needing to get somewhere asap. To have a means of indicating this to me would at least temper my inbuilt rage at being cut up at times ;-)

At the end of the today however, I suppose that any such method is liable to misuse......
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - Lud
Seems unlikely that the police or courts would take a lenient view if anything very bad happened as a result, but if you were just pulled for speeding a convincing plea of that sort just might make a difference. It might also depend on the nature of the emergency and what sort of driving you had been seen doing.

Do I understand from your post that you equate being overtaken by a fast-driven car with being cut up bostin? They are completely different things you know.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - gordonbennet
Bearing in mind that the old bill will have heard more excuses than you could shake a stick at, unless you have someone in a very serious condition in the vehicle, and its obviously a life or death dash, you would get very little leeway.

Would depend too i would say on where you were driving at excessive speeds, in a populated area would get a very serious nick.

Only my opinion.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - shanna
On lots number of occasions we have had to take our daughter to A&E (often at 2am when its quieter) and have had to consider whether we should exceed the speed limit or whether we have a good arguable case for exceeding it. In an ideal situation there would be a way of communicating to other drivers that this is a genuine emergency but is that really possible? How many of us get annoyed when someone is right behind us and desperate to get past and so get 'awkward'. I confess that I probably would. I have never driven at 100mph even in a very difficult medical situation but I can't say my husband didn't do it when I was about to give birth! I think its difficult to justify should there be an incident - my child was ill doesn't excuse causing another child/person to be injured because of 'emergency' driving. I hope that doesn't sound too harsh - I've been there.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - FotheringtonThomas
1) Is there ANY leniency from the law if you get pulled over for exceeding
posted limits in such situations?


It depends on the emergency, and how you are exceeding, and whether there was any possibility of taking some other action.

2) Do the backroomers think there is any realistic way that people driving in a
genuine emergency situation could communicate their 'need' to other road users?


You's have to do what you could. Abroad, in days of yore, handkerchiefs were waved. That sort of thing.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - Blue {P}
I think if the emergency was dire enough you just simply wouldn't care, I would move heaven and earth to get somewhere quickly if I thought that my family were in jeopardy. I can't really remember any genuine emergency situations that I've driven myself, although a taxi driver did once very kindly well and truly breach the 100mph mark to get me to a mate's house who had just taken an overdose. All in vain as it turns out as she hadn't done a proper job of it thankfully and she was right as rain after a night in A&E.

Thinking about it I probably did push a little too hard once (made the car aquaplane which was a new experience for me!) when my mam called to say that she was alone and the house was imminently about to flood, she needed support so in my red mist moment it seemed logical to extend to the red line during a torrential downpour. Wih hindsight, not really worth it as the house didn't flood thanks to our valiant efforts :-)

'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - Orson {P}
Having heard all sorts of excuses, you would probably not get much leniency. IF, however, as someone else has said, there is someone in the back having a life or death moment, then there might be either an escort to A&E or transfer to the back of mine.

You just have to do what you think is best, and argue afterwards. Plod will probably be able to tell if you're telling the truth. Cameras can't.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - grumpyscot
Don't want to sound cruel or unfeeling, but is rushing to attend hospital where your wife is about to give birth, or where your daughter is undergoing emergency treatment actually an emergency on your part? Will your being there help in more than just a "comfort factor"? And since you are not trained to the standard of emergency response drivers, are you not endangering your own life and possibly others by driving beyond the speed limits?

If it is a real emergency, contact the emergency services and let them do the job for which they are trained and for which they can contribute most to the health & safety of all.

Having said all that, I've done the ton+ (on an open , quiet , dual carriageway) doing an emergency blood run for the local hospital - but I got a police motorcycle escort for that.

I know of at least three (local) instances where people have tried the excuse of "I needed to get there quickly because X was dying / giving birth etc". All got their points and a fine. Cut no ice with the local magistrate.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - doctorchris
I would agree with Grumpyscot.
If you feel that it is an emergency medical situation, dial 999 and ask for an ambulance.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - Dwight Van Driver
Under Section 87 Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 there was a exemption from speeding by vehicles used for emergency purposes and this (ambulance purposes) could be used by members of the public.

However this is closed due to:

Section 19 Road Safety Act 2006 which now states in relation to this exemption:

No statutory provision imposing a speed limit on motor vehicles shall
apply to any vehicle on an occasion when?

(a) it is being used for fire and rescue authority purposes or for or
in connection with the exercise of any function of a relevant
authority as defined in section 6 of the Fire (Scotland) Act 2005,
for ambulance purposes or for police or Serious Organised
Crime Agency purposes,

(b) it is being used for other prescribed purposes in such
circumstances as may be prescribed, or

(c) it is being used for training persons to drive vehicles for use for
any of the purposes mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b) above,

if the observance of that provision would be likely to hinder the use of
the vehicle for the purpose for which it is being used on that occasion.

(2) Subsection (1) above does not apply unless the vehicle is being driven
by a person who?

(a) has satisfactorily completed a course of training in the driving
of vehicles at high speed provided in accordance with
regulations under this section, or

(b) is driving the vehicle as part of such a course.

which closes the exemption from the untrained members of the public.

I still have my Class 1 Home Office Advanced Certificates (Car and Motor cycle) pre NSL so I suppose I am one of the lucky ones?

Final two points

(1) Driving at a steady constant speed can at times be just as quick as hammering unless large mileage is involved.

(2) Better to arrive safely than not to arrive at all.

dvd
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - Cliff Pope
So the exemption, even where it does still exist, applies only to observation of speed limits, not to other traffic regulations?

eg bus lanes, undertaking, passing bollards on the wrong side, incorrect lanes at roundabouts, passing red lights, etc.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - ijws15
If the person needing the care is with you you are better calling 999 and asking for an ambulance (and for those who live in the sticks where respose times are slow you should have thought of that when choosing to live there) the care starts when the ambulance/paramedic arrives, not then they get to hospital.

If you are trying to get to them then it is not an emergency of the live threatening kind (there is no other kind) and should not be treated as such. good planning can avoid most of them. (e.g. when the wife of one of my staff was expecting I stood in for him at any out of town meetings to avoid the risk of a mad dash across the country).

'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - b308
I'd have one major concern about an ordinary member of the public being able to do this, and one or two comments above back this up - the person concerned is "not thinking straight" - their concern is just to get to the hospital at all costs - someone who is trained to drive in an emergency, whilst the adrenilin may be up, will make considered judgements when approaching junctions, overtaking, etc as thats what they are trained to do...

An ordinary person, like me, won't, as our first priority is get there as fast as possible - we have enough accidents as it is involving the emergency services, making it a free-for-all with untrained people is asking for trouble..

So the answer is no, but I do sympathise with you - its also worth bearing in mind that modern abulances are extremely well stocked these days and could probably have "stabalised" your daughter in the accident you described before taking her to hospital - more damage can be done by moving people around after an accident by untrained people....
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - billy25
>>(and for those who live in the sticks where respose times are slow you should have thought of that when choosing to live there)<<

The fact we "live in the sticks" should not prevent us having a decent Ambulance, Fire, or Police service! (We still pay our taxes, and community bills) but it does. We have two Ambulances, the nearest Hospital is 45 minites away with a clearish road. It is not uncommon in this area for both Ambulances to be "out", and situations as described in this this thread, do actually occur on a regular basis here. On the "plus" side, as our two Police Officers also very infrequently man our police station, (nearest manned one is 25miles away) we usually get away with "general" speeding in the rural areas, unless we are unlucky enpough to get caught by one of the ever-increasing "sneaky-vans".

Billy
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - moonshine {P}

When my late mother was poorly I found myself in a 'life or death' situation. The hospital was only about 2 miles down the road, for a brief moment I considered driving her there myself. I called 999 and a paramedic arrived within about 3 mins and an ambulance arrived a couple of minutes behind. The treatment they gave there and then saved her life and they spent about half an hour treating her before the dash to A&E.

With the amount of traffic that day it would have taken me at least 15mins to get to the hospital (even if I drove like a loon) and she would have probably died in the car or been left brain damaged.

However, in the following months the illness continued and she was often in and out of hospital and there was several ocasions where I got the call to say "its time". I while I wanted very much to be there with my mother in her final moments I could not justify driving like a loon and potentially taking someone elses life.

Of course this isn't all black and white, there are different levels of speeding. 45mph in a 30 limit is a lot different to 60mph in a 30 limit past a school at 3pm.

Speeding to attend hospital - not acceptable

Speeding to get some one to hospital - maybe ok, depends on the circumstances.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - ForumNeedsModerating
There was a (potentially) 'life & death' situation last saturday night with my mum - she had a nasty fall causing a head injury. On the mend now thankfully (although falls & injuries in your 80s tend to take a longer term toll) but at the time I was faced with calling an ambulance or driving 20-odd miles to the nearest A&E in N.Wales.

I would suggest that whatever rational or considered 'position' you might adopt prior to an emergency, when it happens you just go with instinct. To me the only consideration was immediate medical care, luckily the route was (emptyish) dual carriageway for 80% of the journey & going more than (indicated) 80mph made little difference to journey time, whilst allowing me to monitor (to some extent) her condition on the move.

Had I felt it necessary to go faster (and consequently take more risks), any thought of legal sanction would simply not have entered my mind - in fact I wouldn't even have stopped for a police car if 'requested', preferring to explain or take punishment later.

However, there's a difference between driving fast/breaking laws & driving fast & risking (or causing) further injury or death. It must always be rational to stay in the former category - if you can make that judgement at the time.

It certainly taught me something - it's best not to assume you know 'best' about other peoples' reasons for driving illegally fast. I will assume in future that 'road hog' blasting up behind me may well be on a mercy mission of his own & try to accommodate accordingly.

Edited by woodbines on 29/05/2008 at 11:09

'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - b308
you just go with instinct.


I was speaking from a similar incident and the instinct said dial 999

I'm not trained to assess the injury
I don't know if moving them would make matters worse
I'm not trained to drive fast and safely

How would you feel if you had an accident whilst doing it and injured or killed someone?

Sorry, but certainly in most places where the majority of people live there is no real justification for this course of action - its the "heart" ruling the "mind"

Edited by b308 on 29/05/2008 at 11:30

'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - oldnotbold
It's 999 every time. Don't forget that the Air Ambulance is often dispatched these days if the controller can see that a road vehicle is either not available or likely to be very slow reaching the scene because it is being dispatched from a more distant base.

This happened to us when a builder had a bad fall on a Monday morning at 0915. The helicopter arrived in 15 minutes, and now would be even faster as it's moved to an airfield 2 mins flying time from here. The road ambulance arrived just as he was about to be loaded into the helicopter 30 mins later. He continued in the helicopter, and made a good recovery after 12 days in hospital with a cracked pelvis and some internal bleeding.

Some Police helicopters will attend air ambulance calls - if it's life threatening they are allowed to under their operating authority. Happened locally to here quite recently.

I wouldn't have taken Woodbine's course of action. Head injuries are not to be messed with. Glad it worked out well.

Edited by oldnotbold on 29/05/2008 at 11:17

'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - movilogo
It's 999 every time


I second that. One should never drive in a mentally disturbed state. If my loved ones are in a serious condition I'll be in a very worried state and would avoid driving.

That's why we have police/ambulence/fire brigade.

And if for any reason I need to drive, I won't pay any attention to speed limit or so anyway. My license/vehicle are replaceable, my loved ones are not!

Edited by movilogo on 29/05/2008 at 11:26

'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - P3t3r
There is nothing stopping them giving you normal penalties in a situation like this, but I think the majority would either let you off or give you the minimum penalty. Of course, if it's a speed camera then you're going to get a fine in the post, and I'm not sure whether you'll be able to talk your way out of it.

If it is a life and death situation then what would be better, loosing your license or loosing a loved one? However you mustn't drive dangerously or you'll be risking more lives. In these situations you are likely to take risks that you wouldn't normally take.

As somebody else has said, 999 would probably be a better option. In many cases they will probably get to your place, and then the hospital in the time it takes you to get to hospital.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - oldnotbold
"In many cases they will probably get to your place, and then the hospital in the time it takes you to get to hospital."

Ambulances are no longer a taxi with blue lights. The vast majority of patients will be assessed and stabilised before departing for hospital. None of us, including many medical pros, have the skills or equipment to do this. The paramedics have real-time advice and support in addition to their own training. Trust me, they know what to do. Scooping up your loved one and putting them in the car is really not an option in a post-traumatic medical emergency.

Fine if SWMBO is in early stage labour, or junior has popped their wrist falling off a bike, but otherwise, leave it to the professionals.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - moonshine {P}

certainly agree with this. The treatment starts when the medic arrives, not when you get to hospital.

Those guys and girls really know their stuff, sometimes its best to stand back and let the pros get on with the job. I was very impressed with the service that I/my mother recieved.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - oldnotbold
Also worth bearing in mind that the first vehicle to attend may be a car/motorbike with one/two paramedics. The stretcher and traditional ambulance is not needed until some time after the paramedic is on scene, so that may follow in slow time. A well-driven bike with blues and twos will be fast - far faster than us, and far safer, as it's the job they are trained for.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - Cliff Pope
We had an accident at work a few weeks ago, when someone cut himself badly. We took him in the van up the road to casualty, where they said he needed specialist attention not available there. They had no ambulance available, so our driver was virtually ordered by the doctor to drive from Aberystwyth to Swansea hospital as fast as he could.
All this talk of 999, rapid response, motorbike paramedics, air ambulances, was complete nonsense in this case. It was DIY or bleed to death.

'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - Lud
I agree with Blue that if the emergency seemed dire enough you simply wouldn't bother with speed limits and so on, but leave all that to be sorted out later. But DVD is right too: you want to get there without complicating the situation by having a crash. If you have never practised driving too fast for no good reason except that you wanted to, an emergency situation is not the one in which you should try it for the first time. You may be devoid of natural talent.

I used to live in hope of a copper leaping into my 2CV at the traffic lights shouting: 'Follow that car!' and pointing to the 3.8 Jag containing four big blokes in balaclavas wheelspinning off down the middle of the road. It hasn't happened yet though.

Obviously, if dialling 999 was the most efficient way of dealing with the emergency you would do that. But it isn't always.

Edited by Lud on 29/05/2008 at 15:02

'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - Mapmaker
needed specialist attention not available there. They had no ambulance available so our driver was
virtually ordered by the doctor to drive from Aberystwyth to Swansea hospital as fast as
he could.


So he wasn't then.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - Pendlebury
I had a similar experience to the OP with driving to the maternity ward with my wife.
I did drive through red lights and passed a gatso at allot more than 30. I considered it an emergency as when I pulled up at casualty the head was popping out (oh no - too muh detail !!!!!- sorry)
Anyway after chatting to the midwives afterwards they told me that they would write a letter if I was prosecuted in any way - and when they have done this in the past it has helped get the driver off.
I suppose that if you have an accident that may be a different story though - as the emergency services with blues and 2's can be prosecuted for dangerous driving and by law are not entitled to speed even with the lights flashing - is my understanding.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - Pendlebury
needed specialist attention not available there. They had no ambulance available so our driver was
virtually ordered by the doctor to drive from Aberystwyth to Swansea hospital as fast as
he could.


So he wasn't then.

But at least he could say he was only virtually speeding - I don't know how many points virtually speeding would get you ??
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - Mapmaker
I'm sorry, Pendlebury, but giving birth is a perfectly natural happening. Amazingly the human race has survived for thousands of years before it had cars with which to break speed limits. If the head is popping out at such short notice you're pretty much there. You'd have been better off letting her have it at home - much less messy in the car, too. As for your poor lady wife giving birth when you're taking it too quickly through traffic lights, that's no way to treat her.

If a description of a baby's head is too much "detail" what sort of world do we live in?
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - Cliff Pope
>> needed specialist attention not available there. They had no ambulance available so our driver
was
>> virtually ordered by the doctor to drive from Aberystwyth to Swansea hospital as fast
as
>> he could.
So he wasn't then.


Precisely.
OED definition,
virtual - " That is such for practical purposes though not in name or according to strict definition. Hence virtually"

Obviously he was not actually ordered to, because a doctor has no power to order someone else's employee to do anything. But it was made abundantly clear that
a) the hospital could do nothing
b) it was our responsibility to take him to another hospital

With blood pouring on the floor and all over the van, what else could the driver do?
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - rtj70
"It was DIY or bleed to death."

But the trip to Morriston Hospital from Aberystwyth must be nearly 70 miles and at usual speeds and no holdups close to 1hr 15min... no way would someone in a life threatening condition be driven that distance. Sounds like he needed specialist care after the bleeding was stopped.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - Cliff Pope
Our driver was in no position to argue with a doctor's verdict that the chap had to be taken to another hospital asap. What would you have done - walked out and left him there?
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - rtj70
I still cannot believe the A&E department at any hospital would send someone away who is bleeding so badly. Or is this what has happened with the NHS in Wales?
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - ablandy
when our baby was born we were called and told to go in immediately - this was 12 hours after the waters broke and we had been sent home(due to a complication wifey needed high doses of antibiotics before the birth). Typically the traffic was awful and it took me an hour to get home, and another hour and a half to get to the hospital. It was another 24 hours or so til junior appeared. I had been rather looking forward to a mad dash to the hospital but we didnt need it.

The day after the birth i got from home to the hospital in about 10 minutes i was sthat excited to go and see them both. Early sunday mornings are pretty clear on the roads apparently - and i was driving enthusiastically with a big grin on my face.

Its a more sedate drive now.


'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - drbe
>>>>
Its a more sedate drive now.


Yes, once you've had the first dozen or so, the novelty wears off.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - oldnotbold
"Our driver was in no position to argue with a doctor's verdict that the chap had to be taken to another hospital asap. What would you have done - walked out and left him there?"

It's hard to imagine an A+E doctor discharging a patient whose treatment plan was not complete and insisting that his mate drove him 75 miles across country to another A+E where another doctor, perhaps without warning, would be expected to pick up where the first had left off.

The chances of the patient having complications en-route, or the driver/vehicle becoming unfit (why do ambulances have two crew...) and all the other possibilities just make this story inexplicable.

I'm surprised that you/the patient didn't get it splashed all over the local/national news. It's a story that most provincial journos would give their eye teeth for. I'd expect the Chief Exec of the hospital trust concerned to swing for it, and the doctor to get at least a severe reprimand.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - Lud
Not all a&e departments are equipped or manned to do everything, as I discovered myself a couple of years ago. One would expect of course that they would all be able to prevent a patient with a cut from bleeding to death, and assessing whether although still losing blood the patient would survive a fairly rapid 75 mile journey. But isn't it possible that with a deep bad cut needing proper surgery - repairing tendons and veins, arteries or major nerves for example - the hospital might send the patient to a place with the right facilities? Just a thought. I'm not a medic.

The essential thing is the outcome. Would you really run screaming to the local reptiles without waiting for that onb?
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - oldnotbold
Lud - I might well have tipped off the press if this had happened to me as described above, as it's outrageous!

Sure the hospital may not have had the facilities to treat the guy to completion, but the poster suggests he was barely stabilised. I'm amazed. He'd have been stabilised, admitted, and a road/heli transfer would have been arranged to take him to a booked bed for the treatment to be completed.

NHS can call on the RAF/Royal Navy for assistance if a patient needs transferring at night/in poor conditions. By the sound of things this started in day time.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - Lud
OK, point taken onb, and I must say I am no fan of the post-Thatcher organisation, management-heavy and technician-light, of the NHS (or anything else for that matter). Management by definition is stupid, ignorant and self-important, fit only for secretarial work (OK, secretarial work writ large) but unfortunately very jumped-up in the world we inhabit and in a position to lord it over its betters.

Perhaps the case didn't seem as dramatic and urgent to the a&e department as it did to the patient's workmates. Perhaps the ambulances were all on call and the case didn't warrant a helicopter. It's all just practical stuff most likely: how do we get this non-dying bloke to the hospital with the orthopaedic surgeon quickest and easiest? His mates are here and want to help. Great!

It may be disgraceful, but it may not. You'd have to have been there.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - drbe
I'd expect the Chief Exec of the hospital trust concerned to swing for it and the doctor to
get at least a severe reprimand.


With one important proviso:-

That the facts were as stated by the OP.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - doctorchris
That is a dreadful story. In the early 1980's I was a casualty officer in Bronglais Hospital in Aberystwyth and the hospital offered a full orthopaedic service that would have dealt with this sort of situation without a transfer to Swansea.
On one very rare occasion, at which point I was working in paediatrics at Bronglais, we took a sick baby to Cardiff, I think, by helicopter. In general, however, Bronglais was equipped to deal with almost anything.
I feel that the event you describe should be reported to the hospital managers as a complaint as Bronglais covers a huge area and should still be offering a comprehensive service to the people of mid-Wales.
Swansea is just too far for untrained folk in a van to have to take responsibility for their own transfer.
If you complain, I would be interested in the feedback that you receive as I always felt a sense of pride in the service provided at Bronglais A+E (by the way, I was relatively inexperienced but the wonderful nursing staff guided me through the job).
If you have any feedback, email doctorchris@lycos.co.uk
Chris
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - Lud
Hasn't the NHS been cut financially and messed up by increasingly numerous and incompetent managers since the early 1980s dc? My impression is that it has.

Edited by Lud on 30/05/2008 at 00:16

'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - doctorchris
NHS policy is to centralise specialist services, the logic being that those providing the services are more experienced therefore better and safer. It does also save money.
However, this only works in densely populated urban areas and can never work in mid-Wales where the distances to specialist centres are huge and the ambulance service is overstretched.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - Cliff Pope
Lud has described the situation pretty accurately.
I don't know what the reason was for the lack of ambulances, perhaps engaged at a major accident elsewhere. We don't have to jump to the conclusion that the local NHS was so run down that the ambulances were all broken down, or sitting in the carpark full of grannies on stretchers waiting for proper beds indoors.
Presumably all the harassed doctor saw was that here was a case that did indeed need specialist attention at another hospital, and the patient had someone with him to keep the bandage tight, a driver, and a vehicle that was immediately available. In those circumstances you don't wait to write to the hospital trust chairman, or your MP, you just do what the medical man on the spot says.

I don't think it was necessary actually to speed unduely, therefore this is not really an example of the kind the OP was raising, but it does show that there can indeed be circumstances where an ordinary member of the public suddenly finds himself in the role of ambulance driver.

BTW - the man indeed needed tendons repairing but is recovering satisfactorily. The bleeding was, we discovered later, due to his being on blood-thinning medication. The real hero was not the driver, but his mate who kept the patient calm while keeping the bandages tight. It was quite an event - we don't normally have to hose down the inside of the cab after use.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - Lud
doctorchris points out in his last post above how a one-size-fits-all a&e national policy works OK in London, Manchester or the West Midlands - traffic jams apart - but doesn't suit more scattered and thinly-populated areas. I would point out that this is precisely an example of managerial (which in this context alas often means political too) stupidity.

That said, I feel I may have given the impression that I am an NHS-basher who thinks the NHS is useless these days. I don't think that of course, just that it could obviously be better and more efficient with less management interference and gigantist governmental uberplanning, and more local autonomy and variety led by healthcare professionals.

I have good reason to value the NHS. It has moved extremely fast and effectively when necessary to provide me personally with life-saving services not available to most of the world's population. I worry about politicians and moronic jobsworths of all sorts messing it up.
'Needing' to drive fast when there is a emergency? - doctorchris
I don't want to labour a point, Cliff but in the early 1980's Bronglais had 2 experienced orthopaedic consultants with good junior doctor back up who could repair tendons, even on a patient taking Warfarin to thin the blood, which would be partly for the anaesthetist to deal with anyhow.
What has happened over the past 25 years to reduce Bronglais to a mere staging post where such work has to be transferred to Swansea?
What next, downgrade the Swansea hospitals so that such work requires a transfer to Bristol?
You guys living in rural areas should be fighting hard to preserve your local specialist services or lives will be lost.