The engine might (or might not, I don't know) be more efficient at peak torque, but that would necessarily mean better mpg. At 56mph there is 25% less drag than at 65mph, other things being equal, and it's unlikely that you'll get worse mpg at the lower speed in top gear. If I have time in hand I became a truck at 56mph, and the mpg shoots up compared with 70 (I drive a somewhat van-shaped car).
|
The best economy is achieved at the lowest speed and smallest throttle opening in the highest gear possible ~ without letting the engine labour of course. It helps a lot if you anticipate what the traffic in front is going to do (that's in the unlikely event that you drive faster using these criteria tnan the traffic in front!) so that you use the minimum of braking.
--
L\'escargot.
|
|
Yes, I think that both AS and Manatee make valid points. Near maximum torque, the engine is producing the most power per unit fuel burnt per unit time, but, owing to aerodynamics, the power, and hence rate of fuel burn you need goes up rapidy with increasing speed.
If these were the only inputs, then I think L'escargot's view of slow, high gear, small throttle openings is right, but, you also have to include how much you value your time - this means that the optimum speed is different for everyone!! Students can happily sludge along without a care, while pensioners, for whom every last second is vital, could be steaming down the fast lane, as quickly as they dare!
Number_Cruncher
|
|
|