It seems that years of research have proven that the advantages of warning triangles in most cases are outweighed by the disadvantages of using them: * As they are so little used in the UK, a driver seeing one may not react instinctively (i.e. maintain speed, stay within lane, no sudden changes in direction, watch out for hazard some way ahead). * Placing one correctly (45 metres behind the breakdown - ideally 45 metres beyond a bend in the road which would mask the broken down vehicle) is in itself dangerous. * A triangle is easily blown away, knocked over or flattened. * However, the intelligent fitment of a warning triangle inside the bootlid of most German cars is probably the best, as it reinforces the usually understood impression of "boot open = broken down car" with no added risk to the driver Triangles seem to be on the way out in Spain, as the recently introduced roof-mounted magnetic beacons, which replace the need for a triangle on a motorway, are selling well and enable a driver to place one on the roof from within the car. At the moment, a Spanish registered car has to have two triangles on board, and a driver is expected to place one 50 metres behind the car on a motorway/dual carriageway, with all its associated risks, and also one 50 metres ahead of the car on the same side of an undivided road. In practice, most drivers place one or both triangles right behind the car, serving no useful purpose.
Edited by Bilboman on 29/12/2019 at 12:48
|