"by way of its patented Neodymium super conductors..." as used in the Starship Enterprise.
madf
|
Perhaps it reverses the deflector polarity?
|
|
|
>>It does work.... tried one on my peugeot diesel with no other modification/tuning or change in driving pattern and got a 20% increase in fuel economy - it takes time to take full effect as they tell you, but saved over £100 a year on diesel!
That is about £2 week. approx 22 miles.A few traffic jams and savings lost..Dont think thats much of a saving myself.
As regard it takes time to work..according to the way they describe it to work. It should work pretty much just after its fitted. I`ve heard no change of driving pattern before..
Dont forget. these companies only let you know of good reports
of their product.Rest go to recycling
--
Steve
|
|
.... tried one on my peugeot diesel with no other modification/tuning or change in driving pattern and got a 20% increase in fuel economy - it takes time to take full effect as they tell you, but saved over £100 a year on diesel!
So you only buy £500 of fuel in a year? Hardly the basis of a thorough and robust test and more likely due to the car getting one good blast through to decoke it after only doing 7,000 miles per year.
Absolute balderdash does it work. I'll eat this laptop if anyone provides conclusive empirical evidence. In fact I'll eat my PDA and desktop too.
A final thought..... if you are told to expect improvement over time, guess what? You're driving more than likely will change imperceptibly.
No Do$h - Alfa-driving Backroom Moderator
mailto:moderators@honestjohn.co.uk
|
|
"Perhaps it reverses the deflector polarity?"
No. You've got it all wrong. Please read carefully.
The flux field at the centre of the core is modified by the crystals which emit a strong beam of zeta particles. When these hit the fuel which is partially vaporised, the fuel molecules become polarised and separate from each other. The oxygen molecules also become polarised but with a different charge and diffuse through the mixture giving much superior burning.
As a result you use less acclerator so use less fuel.. hence the zytronic drive efficiency iproves when Mr Spock asks for more pwoer to Warp 10
:-)
madf
|
Just out of unbiased, abstract curiosity,
I wonder how many of this thread's contributors are church-goers?
|
Just out of unbiased, abstract curiosity, I wonder how many of this thread's contributors are church-goers?
Sorry, that's far too obscure for me.
I'll eat my whole desk if anyone can provide proper evidence of this rubbish working. Funny though!!
|
Perhaps the reason it is advertised by a Latvian company is that complaints have been upheld against US vendors:
www.ftc.gov/opa/2001/11/gadget.htm
Presumably they can't touch you for it as long as you stay in Riga (and don't try to sell any to the Latvians).
I especially like the phrase in the report
"...Graphics in the ads showed unruly fuel molecules lining up in straight columns and rows after passing through the Super FuelMAX."
|
No way will I pay a rip-off $49.00 for one of those. I have loads of old magnets from cycle computers at home, and tomorrow I am going to pop into Pound Stretchers to buy some green dots, just to make sure I set the magnets up properly. Bit of Gaffer tape should secure them round the fuel pipe, and this time next week I shall be sitting here counting all the money I've saved.
Lovely jubbly!
|
|
|
2 people drive this car, and all I know is that I'm saving money & you're not!!
The screen name is ironic, apropos naff all.
For the record I drive 25-30,000 miles a year and no matter how hard I hoof it or how leisurely my progress, how full the boot or how hollow the sound of the empty seats around me, I don't vary from the 38-42mpg range. Yes, the above factors do cause a variation, but never outside that range. It's far more common that my economy stays between 39 and 40.5, with the extremes mentioned above only cropping up once in a blue moon.
Perhaps it's because I drive past Glastonbury and Stonehenge so often the ley-lines have synchronised with my fuel pump?
Enjoy your 2/3rds of a can of fizzy drink a day (approx £100/year) but it's nothing to do with your magnet.
|
OK, let me quote in more detail.
Oh must you?
::yawn::
And you were robbed. They go for under a fiver if you're cute with your bidding.
No Do$h - Alfa-driving Backroom Moderator
mailto:moderators@honestjohn.co.uk
|
bka1
I suspect that you are doing well out of these devices. In fact one might almost believe that you were selling them.
The device is rubbish. Everybody knows its rubbish, including you.
Only somebody who is extremely naive and gullible or somebody who is profiting from selling the device would try to argue its value. Which are you ?
|
bka1 I suspect that you are doing well out of these devices. In fact one might almost believe that you were selling them. The device is rubbish. Everybody knows its rubbish, including you. Only somebody who is extremely naive and gullible or somebody who is profiting from selling the device would try to argue its value. Which are you ?
Well, why don't you try one, as our friend says - you can get one for a fiver on ebay, he must have got one too.
|
you can get one for a fiver on ebay,
So that's where I've been going wrong!! Up till now I've been using fridge magnets. No wonder I'm not making a saving on fuel.
|
Given that you failed to answer my question I am going to assume that you have a vested interest.
Given that, then you need HJ's premission to advertise.
Given that, I am going to delete all of your comments and ensure that simply the negative ones remain.
One hour if you both care enough and can change my mind.
>>Well, why don't you try one,
Becauses its complete and utter garbage.
|
|
|
|
|