What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks
Dangerous is the new safe - Sofa Spud
A recent report recommends that traffic in villages and some urban areas could be slowed down, thus reducing accidents, by making the roads more confusing. So white lines, pavements, traffic lights etc would go, replaced by cobble stones and plant tubs.

Up to now, haven't all efforts on traffic planning been directed towards making the roads safer and easier for all to use? Will this new thinking spread to car design? Remove seatbelts and airbags, reduce braking efficiency by 50% and design steering mechanisms with an inbuilt wandering tendency and you have a more dangerous car. Naturally drivers will drive these death traps more cautiously, leading to fewer accidents!

My preferred term for these proposed schemes is 'muddle zone'.
To be serious, I can see muddle zones have a limited application, i.e. where there is an alternative route so that they need only be used by local access traffic, as a next-best-thing aolution where full pedestrianisation is not viable.

Cheers, Sofa Spud
Dangerous is the new safe - PhilW
SS,
I think you forgot the big sharp spike on the steering wheel boss!
Seriously, I also think that these "muddle zones" might work for locals but I can see them being very dangerous for those who are new to the area and therefore haven't a clue of what to expect. I found myself in a similar situation today where lanes approaching a roundabout in an area I have driven hundreds of times before had been changed without warning and I got into totally wrong lane - potentially dangerously so. If a high proportion of traffic had been doing the same as me MORE accidents would occur surely?
Dangerous is the new safe - tyre tread
Surely the locals will soon figure it out and resume driving in their "normal" way and it will be the first timers whao will be slowed down. Therefore the majority of the drivers will be the regular traffic and the calming effect will not last long.

Maybe the local authority figure that lots of slow speed accidents are better than a few high(er) speed ones?
Dangerous is the new safe - v8man
If you drive on the continent you will be used to plant tubs in the middle of the road. Good fun on a motorbike in the pouring rain negotiating these slaloms! Still they look pretty.
--
\"Nothing less than 8 cylinders will do\"
Dangerous is the new safe - PhilW
And, as far as I remember, French roundabouts have no lane markings on them, certainly the Arc de Triomph "roundabout" has none despite its 6 (?) exits and "lanes"! Mind you, they also have a far higher accident rate than us!
Dangerous is the new safe - SlidingPillar
"Muddle zones" are in my opinion dangerous!

I know a 40 limit road that was 60, and when it went to 40 there was so much street furniture added, part of it is no longer safe at 40.

When this happens, if you drive sensibly, you risk being tail ended by people who think the posted limit is the minimum speed.

As for discrimatory objects, the centre humps, often have no effect on a wide axled vehicle yet my three wheeler can only go over them at less that 10 mph. A lot of street furniture/objects are the same. In this case the height of the vehicle (think sight lines) often becomes significant, favouring 4x4s about sports cars, and trucks above them. Which can stop the fastest? Which hurts the most if you get hit by it...

Coo, I feel better for that.
Dangerous is the new safe - Schnitzel
Roads today are rediculously cluttered, the road surface is covered in slogans, lines, patterns, different coloured dressings, chevrons, there is usually a forest of poles with slogans, and 'information'. We are run by control freaks, it's rediculous, look at some 10-20 year old phtos, street scenes were far more pleasant. There is too much information for a person to decipher at the rate it appears at, especially as they are supposed to be concentraing on driving, not playing 'flash cards', That's why most people seem to ignore 50% of signs, such as those saying things like..

Farnborough Road
Experimental Bus Lane
8.00 am - 9.00 am


People just look at BUS LANE on the road, and drive on the right.
Dangerous is the new safe - Robin Reliant
You're right there, Schnitzel. I used to regularly use the Barking Road near West ham football ground. The signs had a big list of times when the bus lane was in operation, differing between morning and evening and another set of times for Saturday and Sunday. Even for regular users it was so confusing that instead of trying to work out if it was operational or not nobody ever used it, apart from those who ignored bus lanes anyway and screamed along the empty lane at 40mph.

Hardly ever saw a bus in it either.
Dangerous is the new safe - v8man
All this street furniture and council funded graffiti on the road has ruined our towns and especially rural villages.They have made them into eyesores.
--
\"Nothing less than 8 cylinders will do\"
Dangerous is the new safe - Sofa Spud
>>And, as far as I remember, French roundabouts have no lane markings on them, certainly the Arc de Triomph "roundabout" has none despite its 6 (?) exits and "lanes"! Mind you, they also have a far higher accident rate than us!

Some of the unmodernised intersections in French towns and cities are confusing, but out on the main roads lots of new roundabouts have been constructed. On these the rules are the same as here in UK except a mirror image - i.e. you go round the roundabout anti-clockwise and give way to traffic from the left. Where the road is a 'passage protege' there is an end of passage protege sign followed by a give way sign on the approach to each roundabout.

Cheers, SS
Dangerous is the new safe - BrianW
I also fail to see the logic of chicanes, where traffic is put into a potential head-on collision situation in the name of safety.
Dangerous is the new safe - v8man
The chicanes round my way seem to entice motorists into a game of chicken to see who can get into them first. Nobody seems to take any notice of the priority signs.
--
\"Nothing less than 8 cylinders will do\"
Dangerous is the new safe - Altea Ego
These mixed zones are used extensively in Dutch urban, suburban and village zones. They work very well there where drivers bikes and people mix quite happily. HOWEVER this is in combination with a faster bypass or through route.
Dangerous is the new safe - Adam {P}
Oh so the technical term is 'chicane'? I like to call them hazards, obstructions, take your pick really.

There are 3 on a road near me with a gradient of 90% (I exaggerate but you get the point). One isn't too bad, on a straight although it doesn't so much slow the traffic as bring it to a complete standstill. The other is more dangerous. Heading south on the road, you round a bend whilst going down a steep hill. To give you some idea, engine braking in SECOND isn't anywhere near enough to keep you from exceeding the 30 limit.

One of these 'chicanes' is on the bottom of that hill on the bend. I drive up and down it every day and I have seen 3 crashes on that haz...sorry...chicane. They look like they are caused by both parties going at the same time.

There are no signs for priority and given that the cars are forced into the middle of the road, I tend to give priority to the people coming down the hill as it's very easy for me to stop.

How many more crashes will it take before they see that these are causing them?

--
Adam
Dangerous is the new safe - Sofa Spud
In some places there is a surplus of information. Some traffic systems are confusing, even to familiar users. A prime example is multi-lane roundabouts with traffic lights on. Maybe you think you're in the correct lane for going straight ahead, but what if the taxi driver next to you thinks he's in the correct lane for straight ahead too? Two into one won't go!

What worries me is that muddle zones will be applied in inappropriate places under pressure from the anti-car lobby, rural and civic preservationists and trendy traffic planners.

My solution here would be to give such zones a separate legal status to normal roads and there would be special traffic signs to identify them. In a muddle zone all road users would have equal priority, whether on foot, cycles or in vehicles. There would be a speed limit of 20 mph at most. In pedestrian injury accidents, motorists and cyclists would automaticaly be held responsible unless they could prove otherwise. For example if a drunk deliberately pushed someone under their car without warning.

Cheers, SS