Thanks for the replies so far :-)
To clarify, the Renault Scenic has been provided to us under the Motability scheme. My wife is the main driver and so, she is named as the owner (and hence main driver on the insurance policy). However, 'I' am also insured on the policy.
The motability insurers did not take on my wife's (or mine) NCD, since they provide the insurance whatever our status - providing the insurance is automatically part of the motability deal.
(For those who aren't aware of the deal, the scheme provides a choice of cars, full insurance, tax and maintenance, in exchange for the disability benefit. Hence, rather than receiving the benefit for my disabled daughter - several hundred pounds - we are provided with a fully maintained and insured car for three years.)
I'd already thought of taking out the insurance on the Focus in MY name at next renewal, then under my wife's the following year, then mine after that. Thereafter we would probably be giving back the Scenic, buying another car, and then BOTH need to take out insurance. This way, I 'think' (confirmed in a reply) that we could both retain our NCD (assuming insurer's ignore the claim on the other insurance policy).
Does this make sense?
Cheers,
Don
|
Sorry if I've missed this, but is one of you the main driver of the Focus, or do you share it equally? Of course fronting isn't likely to be a practical issue if you are of a similar age - and obviously you both have a good insurance history, but theoretically the insurer should know exactly the risk it is taking on.
|
The insurance is in my wife's name (as is the Focus car itself), but I am a named driver, and we drive equally (me slightly more if anything).
What is 'fronting'?
We ARE of a similar age, me 37 her 34 We have both driven since ages of 17, full no claims, only incident being the recent meeting with a big curb and consequent claim.
Cheers,
Don
|
|
|
Firstly, alternating the insurance policies between your name and your wife's over the next few years would eb a good idea. Its quite above board and provided you are not mis-representing who is the main user, I cannot see any difficulty. And referring to David's point, insurers typically take a very liberal view between husband and wife anyway.
Insofar as your wife's NCD is concerned, then its not so straight forward;
On the one hand, you could return to her previous insurer, obtain proof of max NCD and in practice use that with little issue. If your wife had two policies at the same time - her "own" and the motability one then the NCD would only be reduced on one of those policies.
Theoretically that should hold true, but the complication is that she does not hold her own policy and it could be argued that it had been taken into account in the Motability policy and therefore should be reduced. That "taken into account" does not neccessarily mean that someone used it as NCD, it could have been taken into account either specifically in rating your risk or in general as part of rating the portfolio.
If it was me, I would take out a policy in my wife's name while the motability policy was still in force. The argument being that any rating adjustment had been incorporated into the Motability policy (and conceptually it has been, irrespective of any re-rating or not) and therefore need not be taken into account in another policy.
However, its moving into a level of pedentry that most insurance people are not going to answer with intelligence and could actually jump either way.
I've sent you an e-mail.
|
|
|