all ours have retired on huge pensions and spend their time cluttering up the local golf courses.
barney, I had an eye-opener yesterday on where the rest of the police time goes, for the ones who aren't yet retired :(
I was called as a witness to a prosecution for a minor civil disorder case. The case had taken nearly a year to get to court, with a file which had grown to nearly an inch thick. Prosecution witnesses plus no less than three police oficers. The hearing was scheduled for first thing, but delayed until lunchtime by the prev case, which was expected to be very quick but got bogged down in complex legal arguments.
When we were finally called in, it was to be told that the whole thing was a mess: the CPS had basically laid the wrong charges, which really couldn't be heard without further investigation, and even then might not be viable.
Result: unresolved case, mountains of court and CPS time wasted, and (particularly worrying) mountains of police time down the plughole. No wonder there's no officers on the beat if so much of their time is wasted by a system which can't even prosecute a fairly simple and straightforward minor case :(
|
"their time is wasted by a system which can't even prosecute a fairly simple and straightforward minor case :("
Why do you think that defence solicitors drive round in nice cars....?
|
"their time is wasted by a system which can't even prosecute a fairly simple and straightforward minor case :(" Why do you think that defence solicitors drive round in nice cars....?
probably not cos they got lucky on the Lotto!
But I'd advise you against moving your practise to this neck of the woods. The case I was involved in collapsed due its own internal disorganisation: the defendant had no solicitor, and clearly didn't need one.
The defence lawyers round here are going to be back riding the buses unless the prosectors get their act in gear a bit.
|
"the defendant had no solicitor, and clearly didn't need one."
Excellent....there was an old saying -- with a prosecution like that who needs a defence ???
|
Excellent....there was an old saying -- with a prosecution like that who needs a defence ???
Very apt! But in this case, the prosection stressed that they needed a defence lawyer.
I just about managed to keep my temper when the prosecutor started to explain that if the defendant had a solicitor, then the problems would have come to light before the magistrates spotted that the wrong charge had been laid.
The police weren't even particularly fed up: they were well used to this sort of charade
|
|
|
"Why do you think that defence solicitors drive round in nice cars....?"
My brother's one - up North, and he gets to drive around in a beaten up old diesel Citroen estate (T reg, I think).
V
|
|
|
>>>with a file which had grown to nearly an inch thick...
My goodness me...:-)
No wonder you felt cheated after nearly a year's wait for it to get to court.
Seriously, why do you think that the Americans, for instance, hate lawyers so much and, what's more, tell more lawyer jokes than any other type?
|
Seriously, why do you think that the Americans, for instance, hate lawyers so much and, what's more, tell more lawyer jokes than any other type?
sadly, I think this situation is more the inverse of the American lawyer-stereotype, which seems to be based on the notion of lawyers getting rich by unscrupulously milking money out of the system at every turn, e.g.:
Q. Why do layers not eat shark meat?
A. Professional courtesy
In this case, the only lawyer involved was the CPS prosecutor, by the looks of it a relatively junior one. That's usually a salaried postion, and a not-brilliantly-salaried one at that: a sortofa comfortable bureaucratic job.
I suspect that the applicable rule here is the Peter Principle: the theory that employees within an organization will advance to their highest level of competence and then be promoted to and remain at a level at which they are incompetent.
In this case, the level of incompetence was pretty low: inability to read one very simple statute carefully enough to understand that the relevant section did not contain the restrictions set out in the previous sections. Not exactly rocket science to the layman, let alone someone who spent all those years in law school :(
|
A problem that the CPS suffers from is a lack of continuity with the prosecutors. In the case that's highlighted its very likely that's the first time that prosecutor has seen the file.
Perhaps they should employ DVD as a consultant.
Got to go to feed my pet shark now.
|
Shark? thought you guys bred pirahanas.
|
|
Got to go to feed my pet shark now.
I could suggest a few candidates for its next meal. All ready-to-eat, in my local CPS office ... ;-)
|
|
|
|
|