especially in 50 ton bulldozers
www.startribune.com/stories/462/4806557.html
--
I read often, only post occasionally
|
It seems that some boys remain rather risky even when they are a bit older. One angry man plus an armoured bulldozer = an awful lot of damage:
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3778875.stm
Sadly, it seems that he became one of the casualties:
www.cnn.com/2004/US/Central/06/05/bulldozer.rampag...l
|
|
It should be a legal requirement that all fathers should be forced to take their sons to diggerland.
www.diggerland.com
I have done my penance and what a terrible day it was (big wide grin)
|
It should be a legal requirement that all fathers should be forced to take their sons to diggerland.
presumably in order to train them to be even more effective than the boys who got into the news, but only managed a paltry $500,000 worth of damage? ;-)
|
You are such a cynic NW!
Not really, just thinking of a family memory :)
When my brother was very young (I think about 2 or 3yo), my parents had to fill in a form which insisted on recording his occupation. They wrote "demolition worker" and received a very nice reply from the bureaucrats, who wished him continued success in his career.
Unfortunately, my parents weren't as forawrd-thinking as the Reanult Family. They neglected to ensure that he got proper training, so he ended up abandoning that career
|
Kids are drawn to dangerous items like building sites and railways ( I know as a kid a building site was wonderland )
So I figure get them in there young and controlled and thats a tick in the box as far as they are concerned - kinda Pah, bin there done that.
|
|
|