<< We have recently taken delivery of a Hyundai Bayon MHEV with the 120bhp 1.0 turbo and DCT auto. Early days yet, but a trip to Glasgow and (almost) back resulted in an average of 47mpg. Fairly strong headwind on the way, lighter tailwind on the way home and doing between 70 and 75mph. >>
I'm still not clear what these figures of 45-55mpg actually represent. My 30-year-old 205 gets over 50mpg with its 1.4-litre petrol engine. So this Hyundai has done a lot of running just to stay in the same place, consumption-wise. If its EV battery is also being charged 'offline', that presumably uses additional fuel somewhere so the car's real consumption is worse than quoted ?
Apples and pears though isn't it?. The Bayon might be a small car in this day and age, but it has a "footprint" of around 27% more than a 205 (for some reference, the difference between a Polo and a Golf is less than 10%), and more importantly (in urban running), weighs around 50% more. Our recently departed Suzuki Ignis, mechanically at least, is no more advanced than your 205 but could exceed 60mpg on single carriageway A and B roads. At 70+mph though, I doubt it would be any more efficient than the Bayon because it simply isn't very aerodynamic. Not that the Bayon has a particularly slippery shape, just more than the Ignis. And at that speeds, aerodynamics is much more important (within reason) than weight when it comes to mpg.
As I said, the coasting won't work with cruise on, so if I'd been prioritising mpg, I wouldn't have been using it. Also probably worth pointing out that, for whatever reason, the engine doesn't cut out on our car, it just drops the revs to idle speed. Presumably something to do with it being the (DCT) auto?
Also, the battery in an MHEV is charged solely by brake regen, so it does not skew the mpg at all.
The Hyundai is a MHEV which has a tiny 48V battery. They only have a capability to drive very short distances on electric alone at low speeds.
Not sure about MHEV's made by VAG specifically, but to the best of my knowledge, an MHEV won't drive the car any distance.
All the technology has been developed for is to lower the emissions in town.
In most cases maybe, but the coasting on Hyundai's (and presumably Kia's) is enabled by the mild hybrid system, and that is clearly going to be of most benefit to the mpg and emissions at main road speeds.
Suppose they have their place but if a proper hybrid is available in the range buy that, better still get a PHEV.
That's fine and dandy if money is no object, but an HEV is going to cost appreciably more than an MHEV (of the same car) and a PHEV is going to cost appreciably more again.
Difficult to compare like for like because I don't know of any single model available as an MHEV, HEV and PHEV. But the Hyundai Kona is available as a MHEV and HEV, the cheapest version of the former (same trim but manual gearbox) is £4380 less than the latter.
|