<< My post wasn't ageist, but factual and referring to a local incident, >>
The second half of your post referred to a local incident ; the first part concentrated on suggesting that older drivers using their satnav inexpertly were a likely cause.
<< I resent (yet again) being called some ist or phobe by certain 'regulars' >>
You were not called ageist, your post was. Not quite the same.
Splitting hairs rather thinly there, I think.
<< At no point did I say that a majority or all older drivers do this, >>
It is a feeble defence to claim that having omitted the word 'majority' it is somehow OK.
<< it is a fact that most such incidents feature older drivers, precisely because of the higher likelihood of confusion. >>
Proof ? Whose 'fact' ? Of course dementia and similar failings are a feature of old age, but in the context of wrong-way driving on motorways not necessarily the usual explanation.
How often do you read a newspaper report or see a local TV report that says this happened to a young or middle-aged person? At best, such people will blindly follow their satnav's directions down 'the wrong' road' and end up at a cliff face, some other dead end of obviously the wrong direction.
Every instance I've heard of regarding the far more dangerous (unitentionally, differentiating between that an an intenbtional act of a criminal evading the police) going the wrong way down a dual carraigeway or motorway (especially at night) - and sadly there has been a lot over the past few years, increasing as more people have in-built satnavs, is older people.
Again - for the record - I do not believe that ALL or even a majority of older people do this, but as cognative abilities deteriorate with age (at variable rates), so obviously will the ability to judge the road environment, conditions and manage / operate the tech on board, because each younger generation grows up with the latest tech, this also makes using it easier for them, plus many older folk (my dad included) didn't get to grips with computer tech earlier in life and find it hard to learn (old dog, new tricks) - much to their frustration.
The combination of this and other factors such as getting tired (physically and mentally) more quickly, unresolved sight issues (see next one) often, as others have said, with a stubborness to 'keep driving' well beyond the time they should is, in my view, a receipe for disaster.
I have no problem with those (of ANY age) who can demonstrate adequate ability to operate their vehicle in any reasonable time or condition using it. Sometimes that does mean reducing what you can do driving-wise if you realise you're not up to - say - driving at night or for longer than an hour. My mum recently gave up driving and my dad is now not doing longer trips.
Just for information, my dad worked in insurance for all of his working life, so he knows quite a bit about who claims for what and risk, even if he doesn't always look at his own driving behaviour quite so objectively.
I suspect you are taking this personally precisely because you are in that age group as well as me mostly being on the other side of debates of a political nature. You shouldn't, as I'm not having a go at older folk or trying to force them or you to give up driving. Only for people to keep an eye on their own driving behaviour, and to be objective as to when they should reduce their driving activities and when to stop altogether.
I realise doing that is a big step, as being independently mobile is a big factor in keeping active and in touch later in life. Unfortunately, some times the body says 'no' well before the mind realises. That's why trusting of family and friends to be honest, objective and reasonable is paramount, as it's in everyone's best interests.
I don't want anyone - my dad or you included, to end up as these unfortunates have, or, more importantly, for someone to stubbornly keep driving when they should, whereby they cause an accident that kills or seriously injures innocents - ruining more than just the life of the driver at fault.
That's hardly unreasonable, is it?
|