@SLO76
CX-3 is a great idea. I'm not sure of they will fit the drive better than a Focus, but i do like the looks of them, and read some good reviews.
They don't seem that powerful for a 2.0 maybe I read the stats wrong.
Yaris.. I love these but they are just too small. I love the Yaris Crossover but I think it's too new to be in my price range.
The CX-3 in 2L SA-G form (120PS) is fine, no peppy car in terms of performance, but like all modern Mazdas, excellent handling and decent looks. I test drove one (a 2L Sport Nav auto) and I liked it more than the equivalent engined (gen-3 [2017]) Mazda3.
The downside was that the rear visibilty (like many modern cars) isn't great, and thus you need at least the rear parking sensors, plus the car is based on the (2015-) Mazda2 and is quite cosy inside.
The boot is a reasonable size but ONLY if you get the SE-L Nav spec or below, because the Sport and 4WD versions use part of the boot underfloor area and reduce the boot size to under 300L from 350L. In my view, the SE-L (Nav) is the best compromise / value for money, and drives well (with a smoother ride) shod on 16in rims rather than the 18in ones on the Sport/4WD versions.
Similarly with the newer designed CX-30, but as that is based on the Mazda3, the boot and interior is bigger and better. According to one person who wanted a new car and asked for advice here discovered, there is apparently some electrical issues with some of them, although that may have down to factors outside of Mazda's control and possibly down to previous rental firms owning the cars.
The 2L SA-X is better performance wise but you'll pay £2K - £3K more for the car. Obviously the bigger/heavier CX-30 won't match the performance of the CX-3.
|