Dont worry about it- loading on the tappets and cam are highest at idle.
Can you explain that Ben? I thought the stress on the timing belt was highest at high revs. That would suggest to me that the effort required to turn the camshaft increases with speed. The resistance to turning the camshaft surely comes from lifting the valves?
|
No, it's the other way around Cliff. When a new camshaft and followers are fitted, the engine MUST be run immediately to 4000rpm to assist the bedding process. This is because the loadings are so high at low revs.
--
groups.msn.com/honestjohn - Pictures say a thousand words.....
Reply |
Report as offensive
| Link
|
As an aside, I have since found out that in 1999, Volvo switched from hydraulic to solid lifters in their five pot motors, so my 2003 2.4T is so equipped!
I was amazed to learn this fact, in the de-rigeur world of low maintenance engines.
Interestingly, there is no mention of a valve clearance check or re-shim in ANY of the scheduled services according to the detailed list in my handbook.
As another aside, given that there were no valve lifters to pump up, I'd love to know what made the fearsome clatter, and why it faded to silence over a two or three second period, consistent with oil pumping.
|
|
No, it's the other way around Cliff. When a new camshaft and followers are fitted, the engine MUST be run immediately to 4000rpm to assist the bedding process. This is because the loadings are so high at low revs.
So reving a diesel engine during an MOT does not in fact place extra stresses on the timing belt, contrary to popular belief?
|
Yes, of course it does, but the stresses are greater at low speed (cranking speed) as there is no inertia acting on the valvetrain.
--
groups.msn.com/honestjohn - Pictures say a thousand words.....
Reply |
Report as offensive
| Link
|
Sorry, say that again. The stresses are greater at low speed, but reving the engine places greater stresses?
The stress on the timing belt arises from the resistance from turning the cam shaft?
Is that resistance greater
a) at low speed
or b) at high speed, as in an MOT test ?
Or are we talking about different stresses?
|
Deisel test requires engine to be run to rev limiter. Starting a car and reving to 3k is very different.
I think the stress is greatest on the belt when you are accelerating the drive train very quickly- ie unloaded. Reving the engine to max rpm with it loaded i believe puts less stress on the belt than unloaded.
|
|
|
|
the cam shaft doesnt lift the valves, it pushes them open. Valve springs close the valves. More inertia in cam = less reaction through cam belt.
|
Back to the thread: I am pretty damned sure that it *was* the five successive cold starts of a few seconds each, with only use of the idle circuit to drive the car, that caused the problem.
In the interests of an experiment, and with similar weather, I repeated the five starts over the weekend. Each time the engine was run for no more than twenty seconds, and the throttle was not touched. Each start was also long enough apart for there to be next to no residual heat left in the engine. The car was then left to stand for several hours.
What happened on the sixth start?
Yup, revs going skywards, though quickly switching off the engine and restarting only triggered 'normal' starting revs.
Looks like it really was simply an aggressive regime in the anti emissions code, as thought.
|
|
Did i get it right about the cam belt then- im not 100% sure , but i think thats right.
|
|
|
|