I don't agree that 12 years old means a vehicle is at the end of its life,
Did not say that, I said "nearing" the end of its life.
That is based on the age our older cars ceased to appear to be MOT's and taxed.
2010 Ceed still on the road.
2008 BMW looks like it died 2019
2007 Micra still on road
2005 C-Max looks like it died in 2016
2005 Micra looks like it died early 2022
2002 Mondeo looks like it died late 2015
1999 Puma is still taxed but the MOT expired last month
Average age of that lot would have been 14.5 years approx. Thus a 12 years old car is "nearing" the end of its life.
2 surprises for me would be the BMW and the Puma. Other than tyres and brake pipes there were no advisories in the BMW's MOT history. On its last MOT there were no advisories at all. I guess it may have been damaged/stolen since it appears to have been sorn'd or scrapped only 4 months after that clean pass.
The Puma was suffering from the usual corrosion when we sold it aged 6.5 years but it seems to have lived to the age of 23 years. The MOT history is dreadful with a long list of corrosion issues after the age of 11 years.
Your own experience with 7 cars from 4 manufacturers doesn't really represent how long an average car will last.
No surprise the Ceed is still on the road as most Korean cars are reliable and it is the youngest.
No surprise the BMW is dead because even if you ignore the act that they just aren't as reliable as their high quality reputation might suggest, as they get older and cheaper they will often as not end up in the hands of a young driver with no experience of rwd and an overly optimistic view of their skill as a driver.
The Micra's are as likely to be run by an older conscientious driver who looks after it as a youth who neglects it. So unless you know what killed the '05 car, it no longer being on the road isn't representative, it could just as easily have been written off.
Of the 3 Fords, Puma's are getting quite collectable, so owners are more likely to spend money keeping one on the road. The C-Max and Mondeo?, Fords of that age are prone to rust underneath so (unless written off) that is probably what killed them. Which in turn means that with preventative treatment underneath, both could still be providing sterling service (certainly if petrol engined).
The point is that with the right treatment, I don't see there being much reason for any inherently reliable car to be kept roadworthy indefinitely.
This thread is re Japanese quality and it so happens I was looking at a Toyota Camry on Autotrader the other day. A 2002 3.0 V6 with 127k miles (barely run in!) and the MOT history is remarkable. Failed in 2009 because of uneven release of front brakes, a worn CV boot, and not having emissions tested(?), but it has passed every MOT before and since with no advisories. For £2.5k that is a huge bargain for someone looking for a comfortable cruiser, and I have no doubt it has many more years of service to give. I'd have it myself but for my wife's 'new car good, old car bad' mentality!
|