They call that a 'mild hybrid'. They don't seem to be hugely popular.
Not sure what your evidence is for this statement?.
Going by the general comments on the forum, most seem to be very sceptical of the benefits afforded by a mild hybrid and so maybe don't actually want them. But the simple fact is that the majority of new cars currently on sale in the UK which are have a petrol engine but are neither HEV or PHEV will be using a mild hybrid (MHEV) setup.
Do the mild hybrids help consumer any way? I thought manufacturers were forced to introduce them else government would penalize them via punitive taxes for not complying with environmental regulations.
The advantage of mild hybrid is miniscule but one more thing to go wrong outside of warranty period. Typically mild hybrid battery is kept at boot, taking away the space for spare wheel.
As with any hybrid, the amount of fuel saved by a MHEV will be determined by how you drive. But as an example of what is possible, What Car recorded an average economy figure around 15% higher for the MHEV Suzuki Ignis over the solely ICE version in an identical real world MPG test. Not a massive advantage granted, but hardly miniscule.
As for the battery placement being the reason a spare wheel can't be carried, if that is the case(*), then it is due to lazy design rather than necessity. The battery on a typical (for a small car) MHEV is not very big, so doesn't need much space. Nor is it very heavy, though obviously there is more to a mild hybrid system than just the battery. But as an example, the entire mild hybrid system on a Suzuki Swift (* the battery on the Swift is under the floor) adds 25kg to the total weight of the car.
Edited by badbusdriver on 29/06/2022 at 17:38
|